바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The mediating effects of community resilience in the relationship between world assumption and well being of the Sewol ferry disaster in the public: Longitudinal analysis

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2017, v.31 no.3, pp.37-60
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2017.31.3.003



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify whether community resilience is an important mediating factor in the relationship between world assumption and well being of the Sewol ferry disaster in general citizens. Particularly, in the long term, we tried to confirm the mediating effects of community resilience. To do this, we carried out two online surveys at 21month intervals for adults in 20s to 60s. A total of 1156 data were collected at the first time point, and a total of 485 data were collected at the second time point. In this study 307 respondents who reported that they were significantly affected by the change in beliefs due to the Sewol ferry disaster were used, except for those directly related to the Sewol ferry disaster. As a result, in the case of the meaninglessness of world model, community resilience factor had a full mediation effect because the direct path of the primary meaninglessness of world and the secondary well being was not significant. In the case of the unbenevolence of world and unworthiness of the self model, community resilience factor had a partial mediation effect. In addition, a multiple group analysis was performed to confirm the difference according to previous trauma. As a result, the longitudinal mediating effects of community resilience was significant in both group, but there was no significant difference in path coefficients of study model between non-previous trauma and previous trauma group. Based on the results of this study, implications and limitations of the study and suggestions for future research were discussed.

keywords
세월호 참사, 일반 시민, 세상에 대한 신념, 집단역량 인식, 안녕감, 매개효과, 종단연구, Sewol ferry disaster, the public, world assumption, community resilience, well being, longitudinal analysis, mediating effect

Reference

1.

YTN. 세월호 참사 ‘집단 트라우마’ 어떻게 막을까?. 2014.05.05.

2.

중앙일보. [세월호 참사]‘집단 우울증’ 극복 어떻게...“일상 복귀 노력해야”. 2014.04.30.

3.

한겨례. 대형참사 트라우마로 가득찬 거대 병동, ‘한국호’. 2014.04.21.

4.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호. (2001). 심리적 안녕감의 구성개념분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

5.

민지원, 주혜선, 안현의. (2016). 재난 자원봉사인력의 소진 양상에 따른 이차외상스트레스와 세상에 대한 신념의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(3), 363-385.

6.

임영진, 고영건, 신희천, 조용래. (2012). 정신적 웰빙 척도 (MHC-SF)의 한국어판 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(2), 369-386.

7.

이주일. (2004). 노인의 대인애착 경향과 심리적 안녕감, 사회적 활동 및 지지적 관계 추구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(2), 11-29.

8.

Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (2012). Social indicators of well-being: Americans' perceptions of life quality. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

9.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

10.

Beck, A. T., & Dozois, D. J. (2011). Cognitive therapy: current status and future directions. Annual review of medicine, 62, 397-409.

11.

Benight, C. C., & Harper, M. L. (2002). Coping self-efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long-term distress following natural disasters. Journal of traumatic stress, 15(3), 177-186.

12.

Boyden, J. (2003). Children under fire: challenging assumptions about children's resilience. Children Youth and Environments, 13(1), 1-29.

13.

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822.

14.

Brown, K., & Westaway, E. (2011). Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annual review of environment and resources, 36, 321-342.

15.

Cohen, O., Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). The conjoint community resiliency assessment measure as a baseline for profiling and predicting community resilience for emergencies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(9), 1732-1741.

16.

Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), 598-606.

17.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological methods, 1(1), 16.

18.

Ehlers, A., & Clark, D.M. (2000). A cognitive model of posttraumatic stress disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 38, 319-345.

19.

Eriksson, N. G., & Lundin, T. (1996). Early traumatic stress reactions among Swedish survivors of the m/s Estonia disaster. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 169(6), 713-716.

20.

Fiske, S. T, & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

21.

Foa, E. B., Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Tolin, D. F., & Orsillo, S. M. (1999). The posttraumatic cognitions inventory: Development and validation. Psychological assessment, 11(3), 303.

22.

Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 59-109). New York: Academic Press.

23.

Gutierrez, I. A., & Park, C. L. (2015). Emerging adulthood, evolving worldviews: How life events impact college students’ developing belief systems. Emerging Adulthood, 3(2), 85-97.

24.

Harris, H. N., & Valentiner, D. P. (2002). World assumptions, sexual assault, depression, and fearful attitudes toward relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17(3), 286-305.

25.

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical transactions- royal society of London series B biological sciences, 1435-1446.

26.

Janoff-Bulman, R., & Frieze, I.H. (1983). A theoretical perspective for understanding reactions to victimization. Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 1-17.

27.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1985). The aftermath of victimization: Rebuilding shattered assumptions. Trauma and its wake, 1, 15-35.

28.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1989). Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: Applications of the schema construct. Social Cognition, 7, 113-136.

29.

Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions—towards a new psychology of trauma. New York: The Free Press.

30.

Kaniasty, K., & Norris, F. H. (2004). Social support in the aftermath of disasters, catastrophes, and acts of terrorism: Altruistic, overwhelmed, uncertain, antagonistic, and patriotic communities. Bioterrorism: Psychological and public health interventions, 3, 200-229.

31.

Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban health, 78(3), 458-467.

32.

Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.

33.

Keyes, C. L., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical psychology and psychotherapy, 15(3), 181.

34.

Koopman, C., Classen, C., Cardeña, E., & Spiegel, D. (1995). When disaster strikes, acute stress disorder may follow. Journal of traumatic stress, 8(1), 29-46.

35.

Lamers, S., Westerhof, G. J., Bohlmeijer, E. T., ten Klooster, P. M., & Keyes, C. L. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the mental health continuum‐short form (MHC‐SF). Journal of clinical psychology, 67(1), 99-110.

36.

Leykin, D., Lahad, M., Cohen, O., Goldberg, A., & Aharonson-Daniel, L. (2013). Conjoint community resiliency assessment measure-28/10 items (CCRAM28 and CCRAM10): A self-report tool for assessing community resilience. American journal of community psychology, 52(3-4), 313-323.

37.

Magwaza, A.S. (1999). Assumptive world of traumatized South African adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 139(5), 622-630.

38.

Mikkelsen, E. G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2002). Basic assumptions and symptoms of post-traumatic stress among victims of bullying at work. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 11(1), 87-111.

39.

Mäkikangas, A., & Kinnunen, U. (2003). Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: Self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample. Personality and individual differences, 35(3), 537-557.

40.

Nash, W. P., & Litz, B. T. (2013). Moral injury: A mechanism for war-related psychological trauma in military family members. Clinical child and family psychology review, 16(4), 365-375.

41.

Norris, F. H., & Stevens, S. P. (2007). Community resilience and the principles of mass trauma intervention. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 70(4), 320-328.

42.

Norris F, Stevens S, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche K, Pfefferbaum R. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41:127-50

43.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 257-301.

44.

Paton, D., & Johnston, D. (2006). Disaster resilience: An integrated approach. Springfield IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.

45.

Piaget, J. (1971). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.

46.

Pyevich, C. M., Newman, E., & Daleiden, E. (2003). The relationship among cognitive schemas, job‐related traumatic exposure, and posttraumatic stress disorder in journalists. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(4), 325-328.

47.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(4), 719.

48.

Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive therapy and research, 16(2), 201-228.

49.

Sherrieb, K., Norris, F. H., & Galea, S. (2010). Measuring capacities for community resilience. Social indicators research, 99(2), 227-247.

50.

Solomon, Z., Iancu, I., & Tyano, S. (1997). World assumptions following disaster. Journal of applied social psychology, 27(20), 1785-1798.

51.

Sprang, G. (1999). Post-disaster stress following the Oklahoma City bombing: An examination of three community groups. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(2), 169-183.

52.

Steinglass, P., & Gerrity, E. (1990). Natural Disasters and Post‐traumatic Stress Disorder Short‐Term versus Long‐Term Recovery in Two Disaster‐Affected Communities. Journal of applied social psychology, 20(21), 1746-1765.

53.

Sumner A. 2010. Child poverty, well-being and agency: What does a ‘3-D well-being’ approach contribute?Journal of International Development, 22:1064- 75.

54.

Taylor, S. E, & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

55.

Taylor, S. E., Wood, J. V, & Lichtman, R. R. (1983). It could be worse: Selective evaluation as a response to victimization, Journal of Social Issues, 39(2), 19-40.

56.

Triplett, K. N., Tedeschi, R. G., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., & Reeve, C. L. (2012). Posttraumatic growth, meaning in life, and life satisfaction in response to trauma. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 4, 400-410.

57.

Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide. New York: Guilford Press.

58.

Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and society, 9(2).

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology