바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.3

Citation Share

장기목표를 달성하는 힘: 그릿이 높은 사람들이 보이는 미래시간조망에서의 특성

The power of achieving long-term goal: Characteristic of the gritty people based on future time perspective

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2019, v.33 no.3, pp.43-63
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2019.33.3.003
오아량 (연세대학교)
손영우 (연세대학교)
이수란 (백석대학교)
오아량, 손영우, & 이수란. (2019). 장기목표를 달성하는 힘: 그릿이 높은 사람들이 보이는 미래시간조망에서의 특성. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 33(3), 43-63, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2019.33.3.003

초록

본 연구에서는 장기목표와 관련된 그릿의 특성을 밝히고자 하였다. 그릿이 ‘장기목표’에 대한 끈기와 열정으로 정의됨에도 불구하고, 그릿과 장기목표를 구체적으로 살펴본 연구는 거의 전무하다. 따라서 본 연구는 미래에 대해 가깝거나 멀게 지각하는 주관적인 시간지각이 현재 행동에 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 보여주는 미래시간조망 이론을 적용하여 그릿 수준이 높은 사람들이 객관적으로 더 먼 장기목표를 추구하면서도 이를 심리적으로 더 가깝게 지각하고 있는지를 검증하고자 하였다. 이 때, 그릿과 유사한 개념으로 알려진 성실성이 장기목표 설정 및 지각에서 어떤 차이를 보이는지 함께 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 대학생 120명에게 본인의 장기목표가 달성될 수 있는 시점의 나이와 목표까지 남은 시간의 길이를 표시하도록 하였다. 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 그릿은 성실성의 영향력을 통제했을 때도 유의하게 장기목표까지의 객관적 거리와 심리적 거리를 예측하였지만, 성실성은 장기목표에 대한 시간지각을 모두 예측하지 못하였다. 이러한 결과는 그릿이 장기적인 목표를 추구한다는 점에서 성실성과 구별되는 개념이라는 선행연구의 결과를 지지하고 있으며, 장기목표를 꾸준히 달성해나가는 것으로 알려진 그릿의 특성을 시간지각 측면에서 확인하였다는 함의를 갖는다.

keywords
grit, future time perspective, conscientiousness, long-term goal, subjective temporal perception, 그릿, 미래시간조망, 성실성, 장기목표, 주관적 시간지각

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the characteristic of grit related to long-term goal. Despite grit is defined as perseverance and passion for a long-term goal, little is known about the relationship between grit and long-term goal. Therefore, based on the theory of future time perspective, which explains the subjective temporal perception that perceives close to or far from reaching future goals could motivate the present behavior, we aimed to identify gritty people would objectively pursue further distant goals from the present, and feel more psychologically closer to the long-term goals. We also investigated how conscientiousness, which is considered a similar concept as grit, differs from grit in long-term goal setting and perception. 120 university students were asked to draw a line to a point when they would achieve their long-term goal in their life span and write down the age of that point in their life. The result showed that grit was a still significant indicator of objective distance and psychological distance to the long-term goals even when conscientiousness was controlled. However, conscientiousness was not associated with all of the time perception to the long-term goals. These findings support the result of the literatures, which argues that grit is a distinct concept from conscientiousness in pursuing long-term goals, and have the implication that we verified the characteristics of grit known to achieve long-term goals in terms of time perception.

keywords
grit, future time perspective, conscientiousness, long-term goal, subjective temporal perception, 그릿, 미래시간조망, 성실성, 장기목표, 주관적 시간지각

참고문헌

1.

권대훈 (2016). 통제소재, 미래시간조망, 그릿(grit)과 지연의 관계 분석. 교육학연구, 54, 21-43.

2.

이수란, 손영우 (2013). 무엇이 뛰어난 학업성취를 예측하는가?. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 10(3), 349-366.

3.

이유진, 신용환, 박지영, 손영우 (2018). 투지(Grit)가 조직시민행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 31(1), 327-352.

4.

이현주, 신종호 (2009). 다중목표 추구 상황에서목표간 관계가 자기조절 학습행동에 미치는영향. 교육심리연구, 23(2), 261-278.

5.

임효진 (2017). 그릿의 최근 연구동향과 재개념화의 필요성. 교육심리연구, 31(4), 663-681. doi:10.17286/kjep.2017.31.4.04

6.

우연경, 김성일, & 봉미미 (2014). 과제 유용가치의 시간적 근접성과 자기효능감의 상호작용이 흥미에 미치는 영향. 교육심리연구, 28(1), 1-21.

7.

주영주, 김동심 (2016). 영재학생의 그릿 (꾸준한노력, 지속적 관심), 교사지원, 부모지원의자기조절학습능력, 영재교육만족도에 대한예측력 검증. 특수교육, 15(1), 29-49.

8.

하대현, 황해익, & 남상인 (2008). 5 요인 성격검사의 개발 및 학업, 적응, 진로 관련 준거와의 관계. 교육심리연구, 22(3), 609-629.

9.

하혜숙, 임효진, & 황매향 (2015). 끈기와 자기통제 집단수준에 따른 성격요인의 예측력 및학교 부적응과 학업성취의 관계. 평생학습사회, 11(3), 145-166.

10.

Armstrong, A., van der Lingen, E., Lourens, R., & Chen, J. Y. (2018). Towards a new model of grit within a cognitive-affective framework of self-regulation. South African Journal of Business Management, 49(1), 1-8. doi:10.4102/sajbm. v49i1.13

11.

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance:A meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 44(1), 1-26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

12.

Baumgardner Steve, R., & Crothers Marie, K. (2009). Positive Psychology.

13.

Bashir, N. Y., Wilson, A. E., Lockwood, P., Chasteen, A. L., & Alisat, S. (2014). The time for action is now: Subjective temporal proximity enhances pursuit of remote-future goals. Social Cognition, 32(1), 83-93.

14.

Betts, M. J. (2013). Future time perspective:Examination of multiple conceptualizations and work-related correlates (Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology).

15.

Bejan, A. (2019). Why the Days Seem Shorter as We Get Older. European Review, 1-8. doi:10.1017/s1062798718000741

16.

Buiting, H. M., Deeg, D. J., Knol, D. L., Ziegelmann, J. P., Pasman, H. R. W., Widdershoven, G. A., & Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D. (2012). Older peoples' attitudes towards euthanasia and an end-of-life pill in The Netherlands: 2001-2009. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(5), 267-273.

17.

Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance:Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of research in personality, 37(4), 319-338. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00578-0

18.

Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771-791. doi:10.1037/e722982011-084

19.

Cole, S., Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2013). Affective signals of threat increase perceived proximity. Psychological science, 24(1), 34-40. doi:10.1177/0956797612446953

20.

Corker, K. S., Oswald, F. L., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Conscientiousness in the classroom: A process explanation. Journal of Personality, 80(4), 995-1028. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00750.x

21.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor inventory(NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

22.

Credé M., Tynan M., Harms P. D. (2017). Much ado about grit: A meta-analytic synthesis of the grit literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 492-511. doi:10.1037/pspp 0000102

23.

Credé, M. (2018). What shall we do about grit? A critical review of what we know and what we don’t know. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 606-611. doi:10.3102/0013189x18801322

24.

De Volder, M. L., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 566-571. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.42.3.566

25.

Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of personality assessment, 91(2), 166-174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290

26.

Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087

27.

Eskreis-Winkler, L., Duckworth, A. L., Shulman, E.P., & Beal, S. (2014). The grit effect:Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in psychology, 5(36), 1-12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014. 00036

28.

Husman, J., & Lens, W. (1999). The role of the future in student motivation. Educational psychologist, 34(2), 113-125. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3402_4

29.

Husman, J., & Shell, D. F. (2008). Beliefs and perceptions about the future: A measurement of future time perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(2), 166-175. doi:10.1016/j.lindif. 2007.08.001

30.

Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. (2014). Predicting school success: Comparing conscientiousness, grit, and emotion regulation ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 29-36. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.06. 005

31.

Judge, T. A., Higgins, C. A., Thoresen, C. J., & Barrick, M. R. (1999). The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel psychology, 52(3), 621-652. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999. tb00174.x

32.

Judge, T. A., Klinger, R., Simon, L. S., & Yang, I. W. F. (2008). The contributions of personality to organizational behavior and psychology:Findings, criticisms, and future research directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1982-2000. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00136.x

33.

Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of Educational Measurement. World Books: Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY.

34.

Kooij, D. T., Kanfer, R., Betts, M., & Rudolph, C. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867-893. doi:10.1037/apl0000306

35.

Lens, W., Paixão, M. P., & Herrera, D. (2009). Instrumental motivation is extrinsic motivation:so what???. Psychologica, (50), 21-40. doi:10.14195/1647-8606_50_2

36.

Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice: Evidence and an interpretation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 573-597. doi:10.2307/2118482

37.

Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2008). Expectancy, value and psychological distance: A new look at goal gradients. Social Cognition, 26(5), 515-533. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.5.515

38.

Meriac, J. P., Slifka, J. S., & LaBat, L. R. (2015). Work ethic and grit: An examination of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 401-405. doi:10.1016/j.paid. 2015.07.009

39.

Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as a limited resource:regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(3), 774-789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774

40.

Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of personality and social psychology, 93(1), 116-130. doi:10.1037/e514412014-495

41.

Nuttin, J., & Lens, W. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Leuven, Belgium, & Hillsdale, NJ:Leuven University Press & Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.

42.

Peetz, J., Wilson, A. E., & Strahan, E. J. (2009). So far away: The role of subjective temporal distance to future goals in motivation and behavior. Social Cognition, 27(4), 475-495. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.4.475

43.

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological bulletin, 135(2), 322-338. doi:10.1037/a0014996

44.

Rojas, J. P., Usher, E. L., & Toland, M. D. (2012). Creativity and grit as predictors of mathematics achievement in early adolescence. Race/Ethnicity, 8(05), 02.

45.

Schnall, S., Zadra, J. R., & Proffitt, D. R. (2010). Direct evidence for the economy of action:Glucose and the perception of geographical slant. Perception, 39(4), 464-482. doi:10.1068/p6445

46.

Simons, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., & Lacante, M. (2004). Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educational psychology review, 16(2), 121-139. doi:10.1023/b:edpr.0000026609.94841.2f

47.

Suzuki, Y., Tamesue, D., Asahi, K., & Ishikawa, Y. (2015). Grit and work engagement: A cross-sectional study. PloS one, 10(9), 1-11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137501

48.

Thijsen, A., Wiegersma, S. B, Deeg, D, & Janssen, F. (2014). Leeftijd is meer dan een getal:subjectieve levensverwachting onder Nederlandse ouderen.

49.

Thoms, P, & Blasko, D. (2004). Future time perspective as a temporal anchor: Applications to organizations. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 2(11), 27-40. doi:10.19030/jber.v2i11. 2937

50.

Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Soenens, B., Matos, L., & Lacante, M. (2004). Less is sometimes more: Goal content matters. Journal of educational psychology, 96(4), 755-764. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.755

51.

Zauberman, G., Kim, B. K., Malkoc, S. A., & Bettman, J. R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(4), 543-556.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책