바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.33 No.3

Citation Share

행복 변동성의 차이에 관한 연구: 대학생 종단 자료를 이용한 잠재계층성장 모형 접근

Individual Differences in Happiness Variability: A Latent Class Growth Modeling Approach Using Longitudinal Data from Undergraduates

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2019, v.33 no.3, pp.21-42
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2019.33.3.002
권유리 (서울대학교)
최인철 (서울대학교)
최종안 (강원대학교)
권유리, 최인철, & 최종안. (2019). 행복 변동성의 차이에 관한 연구: 대학생 종단 자료를 이용한 잠재계층성장 모형 접근. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 33(3), 21-42, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2019.33.3.002

초록

본 연구는 행복의 변동 여부와 변동 양상의 차이를 알아보기 위해 실시하였다. 기존의 연구들이 행복의 평균적 변화에만 주목하여 행복을 고정된 특질 혹은 유동적 상태로 이분하여 보았던 것과 달리, 본 연구는 행복 변동 양상에서의 개인차 가능성을 고려하여, 행복의 변동이 개인에 따라 상이한 형태로 나타나는지 조사하였다. 이를 위해 3년에 걸쳐 수집된 대학생 종단 자료(N = 219)를 활용하여 행복 변화에 대한 잠재계층성장모형 분석을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 행복 변화 유형에 따라 하위-증가형, 유지형, 그리고 감소형의 세 하위 집단이 확인되었다. 추가 로지스틱 분석 결과, 일부 인구 통계학 변인과 성격 특질 변인들이 행복 변화 유형을 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과들의 시사점 및 한계점에 대해 논하였다.

keywords
happiness, stability, variability, longitudinal study, latent class growth model, 행복, 안정성, 변동성, 개인차, 종단 연구, 잠재계층성장모형

Abstract

The current research aimed to explore whether and how happiness varied. While previous studies mainly focused on either the stability of happiness or the variability of happiness, we took into account the possibility that there might be differences in the patterns of variability in happiness and investigated whether happiness varied in different patterns among different people. To this end, we conducted a series of latent class growth modeling analyses with longitudinal data collected from undergraduates for three years (N = 219). The results showed that there were three different subgroups in terms of patterns of happiness change: increasing vs. stable vs. decreasing. Subsequently, the results of logistic regression analyses indicated that a few demographic variables (i.e., age and major) and Big Five traits (i.e., extroversion, emotional stability, and conscientiousness) could predict the patterns of happiness change. We discussed the implications and limitations of the current research.

keywords
happiness, stability, variability, longitudinal study, latent class growth model, 행복, 안정성, 변동성, 개인차, 종단 연구, 잠재계층성장모형

참고문헌

1.

구재선 (2009). 행복은 심리적 자원을 형성하는가. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(1), 165-179.

2.

국승희, 손정락 (2003). Happy-QoL 척도의 교차타당화. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(3), 699-708.

3.

김명소, 김혜원, 차경호 (2001). 심리적 안녕감의구성개념분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(2), 19-39.

4.

김소영, 윤기봉 (2016). 잠재성장모형을 이용한청소년의 삶의 만족도 변화추정. 한국청소년연구, 27(2), 271-296.

5.

박성현. (2002). 이공계 대학 교육 내실화 방안 연구. 서울: 한국과학재단.

6.

박순미, 손지아, 배성우 (2009). 노인의 생활만족도 변화에 대한 종단적 접근. 사회과학연구, 25(3), 1-24.

7.

양연호 (2018. 6. 6.). 고교물리도 모르는 공대생…서울대 ‘물리학 열등반’ 보충수업. 매일경제, http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2018&no=358891.

8.

이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 빛 부적 정서 척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22, 935-946.

9.

정윤화, 봉초운, 홍세희 (2018). 잠재성장모형을적용한 청소년의 삶의 만족도 변화와 영향요인 분석. 청소년학연구, 25(1), 181-210. DOI: 10.21509/KJYS.2018.01.25.1.181

10.

조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가간 비교. 서울: 집문당

11.

최인철, 최종안, 최은수, 이성하, 김남희, 이서진, 이민하, 권유리 (2019). About H: 대한민국 행복 리포트 2019. 경기: 21세기북스

12.

최현옥, 김혜리 (2010). 대학생의 마음읽기 능력과 공감하기-체계화하기 성향의 성차와 전공차. 한국심리학회지: 발달, 23(1), 119-139.

13.

Armenta, C., Bao, K. J., Lyubomirsky, S., & Sheldon, K. M. (2014). Is lasting change possible? Lessons from the hedonic adaptation prevention model. In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas, (Eds). Stability of happiness (pp. 57-74). Elsevier.

14.

Bartels, M. (2015). Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behavior Genetics, 45(2), 137-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y

15.

Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2008). Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle?. Social Science & Medicine, 66(8), 1733-1749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030

16.

Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Public Health, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119

17.

Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917-927. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917

18.

Charles, S. T., Reynolds, C. A., & Gatz, M. (2001). Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 136-151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917

19.

Compton, W. C., Smith, M. L., Cornish, K. A., & Qualls, D. L. (1996). Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 406-413. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.406

20.

Cummins, R. A. (2014). Can happiness change? Theroies and evidence. In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas, (Eds). Stability of happiness (pp. 75-92). Elsevier.

21.

DeNeve, K. M., & Cooper, H. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197-229. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197

22.

Diener, E. (2014). Stable happiness dies in middle-age: A guide to future research. In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas, (Eds). Stability of happiness (pp.305-308). Elsevier.

23.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with life scale, Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

24.

Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497-527. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0076-y

25.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1):15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.115

26.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2350-6_5

27.

Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2009). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. In E. Diener, (Ed.) The science of well-being (pp. 103-118). Springer: Dordrecht.

28.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being:Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056

29.

Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 1–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00501001.x

30.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

31.

Diener, E., Tay, L., & Oishi, S. (2013). Rising income and the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 267-276. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030487

32.

Dijkers, M. P. (1997). Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta analysis of the effects of disablement components. Spinal Cord, 35, 829-840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100571

33.

Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177-205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030153

34.

Fredrick, S., & Loewenstein, G. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of a hedonic psychology (pp. 302-329). New York:Russell Sage Foundation.

35.

Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 158-164. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158

36.

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the big - five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

37.

Griffin, P. W., Mroczek, D. K., & Spiro III, A. (2006). Variability in affective change among aging men: Longitudinal findings from the VA Normative Aging Study. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 942-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.011

38.

Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes:Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin”. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419

39.

Helliwell, J. F., Bonikowska, A., & Shiplett, H. (2016). Migration as a test of the happiness set point hypothesis: Evidence from immigration to Canada. Annual Meetings of the Canadian Economics Association, Ottawa, June 3.

40.

Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4

41.

Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x

42.

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review, 94, 429-434.

43.

Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007

44.

Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.

45.

Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767-778. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767

46.

Lucas, R. E. (2007). Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being:Evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 717-730. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.717

47.

Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 527-539. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527

48.

Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 616-628. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616

49.

Lykken, D. (1999). Happiness: The nature and nurture of joy and contentment. New York: St. Martin’s Griffin.

50.

Lykken, D., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7(3), 186-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00355.x

51.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041

52.

McGregor, I., & Little, B. R. (1998). Personal projects, happiness, and meaning: on doing well and being yourself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 494-512. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.494

53.

Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1333-1349. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1333

54.

Myers, D. G., & Diener, E. (1995). Who is happy?. Psychological science, 6(1), 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00298. x

55.

Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127

56.

Peel, D., & McLachlan, G. J. (2000). Robust mixture modelling using the t distribution. Statistics and computing, 10(4), 339-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008981510081

57.

Roberts, B. W., & Del Vecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank- order consistency of personality from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.3

58.

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological science, 2(4), 313-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x

59.

Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vittersø, J. (2014). Well-being: Heritable and changeable. In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas, (Eds). Stability of happiness (pp. 9-36). Elsevier.

60.

Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 69, 719-727. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4. 719

61.

Schueller, S. M., & Seligman, M. E. (2010). Pursuit of pleasure, engagement, and meaning:Relationships to subjective and objective measures of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 253-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439761003794130

62.

Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52(3), 333-343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360

63.

Sheldon, K. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Is it possible to become a permanently happier person? In K. M. Sheldon, & R. E. Lucas, (Eds). Stability of happiness (pp. 1-7). Elsevier.

64.

Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 73-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500510676

65.

Springer, K. W., Pudrovska, T., & Hauser, R. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 40(1), 392-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.008

66.

Steel, S., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138-161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138

67.

Turkheimer, E. (2000). Three laws of behavior genetics and what they mean. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 160-164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00084

68.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063

69.

Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). Explaining away: A model of affective adaptation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(5), 370-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008. 00085.x

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책