바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

성인애착유형과 결혼, 이성교제 경험, 상실의 경험여부 및 관련변인들과의 관계

Relations of Adults’ Attachment Type with Marriage, Experience of Dating, Experience of Loss

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2008, v.13 no.2, pp.411-428
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2008.13.2.007
임정선 (서울사이버대학교)

초록

본 연구에서는 Hoeger와 Buschkaemper(2002)가 독일에서 개발한 ‘배우자(연인)관계 기대에 관한 설문조사(Bielefelder Fragebogen zu Partnerschaftserwartungen)’를 측정도구로 사용하여 성인의 애착유형 분포를 확인하였고, 이와 애착유형의 변화에 긍정적으로 작용하는 결혼여부 및 이성교제 경험과 부정적 영향을 미치는 상실의 경험과의 연관성과 관련변인들과의 연관성을 연구하였다. 특히 측정도구로 사용된 ‘배우자(연인)관계 기대에 관한 설문조사’는 성인의 애착유형을 연속적 차원에서 분류하는 도구로써 애착유형을 세 범주로 제한하지 않고 세분화하여 확인 할 수 있는 장점이 있다. 연구 결과, 성인의 애착유형으로 안정애착, 불안정-양가애착, 불안정-회피-협조적인 애착, 불안정-회피-닫힌 애착 등 네 가지의 애착유형이 확인되었다. 확인된 애착유형의 분포는 연령, 결혼여부, 이성교제 경험에 따라 유의미한 차이를 나타냈는데, 연령이 높을수록 결혼을 했을 때 이성교제 경험이 있는 경우에서 안정애착에 속하는 비율이 높게 나타났다.

keywords
애착, 성인의 애착유형, 이성교제 경험, 상실의 경험, attachment, adults’ attachment type, experience of dating, experience of loss, attachment, adults’ attachment type, experience of dating, experience of loss

Abstract

The present study surveyed the distribution of adults’ attachment types using the questionnaire (Bielefelder Fragebogen zu Partnerschaftserwartungen) on expectation for spouse (Partner) relation developed by Hoeger and Buschkaemper (2002) in Germany, and analyzed the distribution of attachment types according to demographic variables, experience of loss that is a risk factor affecting the change of attachment quality, and experience of dating andmarriage that may work as negative factors or as positive factors. The questionnaire mentioned above is a tool that classifies adults’ attachment type as a continuous variable, so it can subdivide attachment types in detail rather than limiting them into three categories. According to the results of this study, four types of adult attachment were identified, which were secure attachment; insecure-ambivalent attachment; insecure-avoidant-cooperative attachment; and insecure-avoidant-closed attachment. The distribution of the identified attachment types showed significant differences according to age, marital status and experience of dating. That is, the percentage of security attachment was higher in those who were older, those who were married, and those who had experiences of dating.

keywords
애착, 성인의 애착유형, 이성교제 경험, 상실의 경험, attachment, adults’ attachment type, experience of dating, experience of loss, attachment, adults’ attachment type, experience of dating, experience of loss

참고문헌

1.

김주연, (2001) 대학생의 애착유형에 따른 사회적 지지수준 및 이성관계 만족도의 관계,

2.

신노라, (2000) 성인 애착 유형과 대인 불안 수준의 관계,

3.

이복동, (2000) 성인 애착과 이성관계 만족-거부 민감성과 귀인 양식의 매개효과를 중심으로,

4.

임정선, (2007) 한국과 독일 성인의 애착유형에 대한 비교연구, 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료

5.

정미나, (2003) 성인 애착과 자기효능감 및 심리적 적응간의 관계,

6.

Ainsworth, M. D. S., (1978) Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation, Erlbaum

7.

Ainsworth,M.D.S., (1989) Attachments beyond infancy, American Psychologist

8.

Ainsworth,M.D.S., (1991) Attachments and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In : Attachment across the life cycle, Tavistock/Routledge

9.

Bartholomew,K., (1991) Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

10.

Bierhoff,H.W., (1999) Romantische Beziehungen, Verlag Hans Huber

11.

Bowlby, J., (1984) Attachment and loss, Vol. 1: Attachment, Basic Books

12.

Bowlby, J., (1976) Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation: anxiety and anger, Basic Books

13.

Bowlby, J., (1983) Attachment and loss, Vol. 3: Loss, sadness and depression, Basic Books

14.

Bowlby,J., (1995) Elternbindung und Persoenlichkeitsentwicklung: Therapeutishce Aspekte der Bindungstheorie, Dexter Verlag

15.

Braeutigam,W., (1991) Bindung und Sexualitaet in psychoanalytischen Theorien und in der Praxis, In Psychotherapeutische Psychosomatische Medizinische Psychologie

16.

Brethrton,I., (2001) Aktuelle Studien zur Bindung. In : Bindung im Erwachsenenalter, Verlag Hans Huber

17.

Buschkaemper,S., (1998) Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung des Bindungsstils erwachsener Personen, Universitaet Bielefeld: Unveroeffentlichte Diplomarbeit

18.

Collins,N.L., (1990) Adult attachment working models and relationship quality in dating couples, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

19.

Feeney,J.A., (1990) Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

20.

Fremmer-Bombik,E., (1997) Innere Arbeitsmodelle von Bindung. In : Die Bindungstheorie, Klett-Cott

21.

Hazan,C., (1987) Romantic love conceptualized as am attachment process, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

22.

Hoeger, D., (2002) Der Bielefelder Fragebogen zu Partnerschaftserwartungen (BFPE): Ein alternativer Vorschlag zur Operationalisierung von Bindungsmustern mittels Fragebgen, Zeitschrift fuer Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 2

23.

Holmes,J., (2002) John Bowlby und die Bindungstheorie, Reinhardt

24.

Kirkpatrick,L.A., (1994) Attachment style, gender, and relationship젨젨젨?stability: A longitudinal analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

25.

Loew,I., (1994) Erwartungen von Patienten stationaerer Gruppenpsychotherapie an die therapeutische Beziehung, Universitaet Bielefeld: Unveroeffentlichte Diplomarbeit

26.

Main,M., (2001) Aktuelle Studien zur Bindung. In : Bindung im Erwachsenenalter, Verlag Hans Huber

27.

Mikula,G., (1998) Partnerschaftsbezogene Bindungsstile und Verhaltenserwartungen an Liebespartner, Freund und Kollegen, Zeitschrift fuer Soziologie

28.

Zhang,F., (2004) Stability and fluctuation in adult attachment style over a 6-year period, Attachment & Human Development

29.

Zimmermann, P., (2000) Bindungsentwicklung bis zum Jugendalter, Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht

한국심리학회지: 건강