Measuring the prevalence of gambling addiction has become a major issue for health psychologists and policy-makers in Korea as gambler has expanded. However, there has been considerable debate about the definition of gambling addiction and the most appropriate ways of measuring it. This paper presents a comparative evaluation of three problem gambling screens: KNODS, KCPGI, KSOGS. Each screens were assessed in terms of content, reliability,validity and cutoff and classification agreement. Participants were 1,375, using casino. While finding limitations with all three screens, overall the study found that the KCPGI demonstrated the best measurement properties of the three gambling instruments. As well as limitations, the paper discusses issues for future consideration in prevalence studies and the measurement of gambling addiction.
김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 K-NODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지 건강, 8(3), 487-509.
김교헌, 성한기, 이민규 (2004). 도박성 게임 이용자의 심리사회적 특성과 문제성 및 병적 도박의 예측요인. 한국심리학회지 건강, 9(2), 285-320.
김교헌, 이흥표, 권선중 (2005). 한국사회의 병적도박유병률에 대한 연구:KNODS, KMAGS 및 KSOGS의 추정치 비교. 한국심리학회지:건강, 10(2), 227-242.
사행산업통합감독위원회 (2010a). 사행산업 관련 통계.서울.
사행산업통합감독위원회 (2008). 사행산업 이용실태 조사분석 및 총량조정 연구. 서울.
사행산업통합감독위원회 (2010b). 사행산업 이용실태 조사. 서울.
심원섭 (2007). 갬블링 이용객의 갬블링 중독 측정지표비교 연구. 관광 레저 연구, 19(3), 243-261.
이경희 (2009). 한국판 캐나다 문제도박척도(CPGI)의 타당화를 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지 건강, 14(3), 667-675.
인코그룹 (2002). 병적 도박 실태조사 및 치료프로그램 연구용역 보고서. 한국마사회/국민체육진흥공단공동용역
최완철, 김경빈, 오동열, 이태경 (2001). 한국형 사우스오크 병적 도박 검사 표준화에 대한 연구. 중독정신의학, 5(1), 46-52.
한국마사회 (2009). 전국민 대상 대규모 도박이용실태조사. 서울.
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(4th edn, text revision). APA, Washington, DC.
Battersby, M. W., Thomas, L. J., Tolchard, B., & Esterman, A. (2002). The South Oaks Gambling Screen: A review with reference to Australian use. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 257–271.
Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of pathological and problem gambling. Addictions, 97(5), 487-499.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284-290.
Duvarci, I., Varan, A., Coskunol, H., & Ersoy, M. A. (1997). DSM-IV and the South Oaks Gambling Screen: Diagnosing and assessing pathological gambling in Turkey. Journal of Gambling Studies, 13, 193–206.
Neill, J. J., & Dunn, O. J. (1975). Equality of Dependent Correlation Coefficients. Biometrics, 31(2), 531-543.
Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index:Final Report. Ontario: the Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffman, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R., Larison, C., Chuchro, L., Bard, A., Engelman, L., Hill, M. A., Buie, T., Volberg, R., Harwood, H., Tucker, A., Christiansen, E., Cummings, W., & Sinclair, S. (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study: Report to the national gambling impact study commission. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188.
Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1993). Revising the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Different Settings. Journal of Gambling Studies 9(3), 213-223.
McMillen, J., & Wenzel, M. (2006). Measuring Problem Gambling: Assessment of Three Prevalence Screens. International Gambling Studies, 6(2), 147 - 174.
Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27(1), 1-19.
Walker, M., & Dickerson, M. (1996). The prevalence of problem and pathological gambling: A critical analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 233–249.