바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

신앙인들의 종교지향, 종교적 원리주의, 영적 웰빙 및 주관적 웰빙

Religious Orientation, Fundamentalism, Spiritual Well-being, and Subjective Well-being among Religious People

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2012, v.17 no.4, pp.1067-1086
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.4.017
전은식 (삼육대학교)
서경현 (삼육대학교)

초록

본 연구는 종교를 가진 신앙인의 종교지향, 영적 웰빙 및 주관적 웰빙 간의 관계를 탐색하고, 웰빙에 대한 종교지향과 종교적 원리주의의 상호작용을 검증하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 본 연구의 참여자는 수도권에 거주하는 신앙인 317명이었으며, 그들은 연령은 만 20세에서 81세(M=52.00, SD=11.16)까지 분포되어 있었다. 본 연구에서 사용된 심리검사는 I/E-R 종교지향척도, 종교적 원리주의척도, 영적웰빙척도, 정서빈도검사, 삶의 만족척도 및 주관적 행복척도이다. 분석 결과, 신앙인의 종교지향은 영적 웰빙과 밀접한 관계가 있었으며 주관적 웰빙과도 정적으로 관계하고 있었다. 하지만 사회적 종교지향은 영적 웰빙은 물론 주관적 웰빙과도 상관이 없는 것으로 나타났으며 실존적 웰빙 중에 의미감과는 유의한 부적 상관을 보였다. 종교적 원리주의는 영적 웰빙뿐 아니라 주관적 행복과도 정적으로 관계하고 있었다. 그러나 단계적 회귀분석은 종교적 원리주의에서 내적 종교지향 요소를 제거하면 부정정서와는 정적으로 주관적 행복과는 부적으로 관계하는 것을 보여주었다. 주관적 웰빙과 관계하는 영적 웰빙은 충족감이었는데, 종교적 웰빙에서 충족감 부분을 제하면 삶의 만족과 부적 상관이 있었다. 한편 영적 웰빙과 주관적 웰빙에는 종교지향과 종교적 원리주의의 상호작용효과가 유의하였다. 단순주효과 분석결과, 종교적 원리주의가 약한 집단에서만 종교지향 수준이 높으면 낮은 것보다 영적 웰빙 수준이 유의하게 높았고, 반대로 종교적 원리주의가 강한 집단에서만 종교지향 수준이 높으면 낮은 것보다 주관적 웰빙 수준이 유의하게 높았다. 이런 결과는 종교성 변인들이 서로 상호작용하며 웰빙에 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 시사한다.

keywords
종교지향, 종교적 원리주의, 영성, 웰빙, 행복, religious orientation, religious fundamentalism, spirituality, well-being, happiness

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationships between religious orientations, religious fundamentalism, spiritual well-being, and subjective well-being among religious people, and to examine the interaction of religious orientations and the religious fundamentalism on their well-being. The participants were 317 religious people who were living in Seoul and the suburb, whose age were ranged from 20 to 81 (M=52.00, SD=11.16). The psychological tests used in this research included the following: I/E-R, the Religious Fundamentalism Scale, the Spiritual Well-Being Scale, Emotion Frequency Test, Satisfaction with Life Scale, and Subjective Happiness Scale. Results revealed that the religious orientation was closely correlated with spiritual well-being, and it was also positively correlated with subjective well-being of religious people. However, extrinsic religious orientation with social conformity was not significantly correlated with spiritual well-being and subjective well-being, and inversely, it was negatively related to feeling of meaningfulness of existential well-being. Religious fundamentalism was positively correlated with subjective well-being, as well as spiritual well-being. Yet, results of stepwise regression analyses indicated that religious fundamentalism, as it was adjusted by intrinsic religious orientation, was positively related to negative emotion and negatively to subjective happiness. Spiritual well-being, which is related to subjective well-being, was a satisfying feeling of existential well-being. Moreover, if religious well-being was adjusted by satisfying feeling of existential well-being, it was negatively related to life satisfaction. On the other hand, interaction effects of religious orientation and the religious fundamentalism on spiritual well-being and subjective well-being. Simple main effect analyses revealed that people with higher religious orientation showed higher spiritual well-being than those with lower religious orientation in only people with lower religious fundamentalism; whereas people with higher religious orientation showed higher subjective well-being than those with lower religious orientation in only people with higher religious fundamentalism. This finding suggests that religiosity variables with interactions could affect human well-being.

keywords
종교지향, 종교적 원리주의, 영성, 웰빙, 행복, religious orientation, religious fundamentalism, spirituality, well-being, happiness

참고문헌

1.

김동기 (2007). 행복과 종교적 태도의 개념관계 모형들에 대한 비교 검증. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12,347-365.

2.

김정호 (2007). 삶의 만족 및 삶의 기대와 스트레스 및웰빙의 관계: 동기상태이론의 적용. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12, 325-345.

3.

김혜숙, 최진호 (1997). 한국인의 모임활동과 주관적 안녕감. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 3, 41-60.

4.

문화관광부 (1997). 청소년의 영혼과 종교세계 의식조사. 청소년 대화의 광장.

5.

서경현, 전겸구 (2004). 영적 안녕, 생활 스트레스 및 대처. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 9, 333-350.

6.

서경현, 김정호, 유제민 (2009). 성격과 주관적 웰빙 간의 관계: Big 5 성격요인과 BAS/BIS를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 15, 169-186.

7.

서경현, 양승애 (2010). 심리적 스트레스 반응과 주관적웰빙에 대한 자기애와 자존감의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15, 653-671.

8.

전겸구, 정봉도, 김영환 (2000). 생활스트레스, 영적 안녕 및 우울간의 관계. 난청과 언어장애연구, 23,311-325.

9.

정성진, Ji, 김신섭, 서경현 (2010). 종교지향과 주관적웰빙의 관계에 대한 종교적 원리주의의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 11, 19-41.

10.

조명한, 차경호 (1998). 삶의 질에 대한 국가간 비교. 서울: 집문당.

11.

통계청 (2010). 인구주택총조사 보고서. 서울: 통계청

12.

통계청 (2012). 베이비부머 및 에코세대의 인구․사회적특성분석. 서울: 한국개방연구원.

13.

한내창 (2001). 우리문화에서 I/E 및 기타 종교성 척도.한국사회학, 35(6), 193-215.

14.

황혜리, 서경현, 김지윤 (2011). 대학생의 영적 안녕과심리적 안녕 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강,16, 709-724.

15.

Allport, C. W. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan.

16.

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge. MA: Perseus Books.

17.

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 432-443.

18.

Altmeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113-133.

19.

American Psychological Association (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.

20.

Andreasen, N. J. C. (1972). The role of religion in depression. Journal of Religion and Health, 11, 153-166.

21.

Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. London: Routledge.

22.

Argyle, M., & Hills, P. (2000). Religious experiences and their relationships with happiness and personality. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 157-172.

23.

Armstrong, K. (2001). The Battle for God: A History of Fundamentalism. New York: Ballantine Books.

24.

Batson, C. D., & Ventis, W. L. (1982). The religious experience: A Social-psychological perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Batson, C. D., Schoenrade, P., & Ventis, W. L.(1993). Religion and the individual: Asocial-psychological perspective. New York:Oxford University Press.

26.

Bergin, A. E. (1983). Religiosity and mental health: A critical reevaluation and meta-analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 14, 170-184.

27.

Burris, C. T., & Jackson, L. M. (2000). Social identity and the true believer: Responses to threatened self stereotypes among the intrinsically religious. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 257-278.

28.

Chamberlain, K. & Zika, S. (1989). Religiosity, life memory, and well-being: Some relationships in a sample of women. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 411-420.

29.

Chatters, L. M., Bullard, K. M., Taylor, R. J., Wodward, A. T., Neighbors, H. W., & Jackson, J. S. (2008). Religious Participation and DSM-IV Disorders Among Older African Americans: Fingings from the national survey of American life. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 957-965.

30.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.

31.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

32.

Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L.(1999). Subjective well-being: Three decadesof progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125,276-302.

33.

Donahue, M. J. (1985). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiousness: Review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 400-419.

34.

Dull, V. T., & Skokan, L. A. (1995). A cognitive model of religion's influence on health. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 49-64.

35.

Ellis, A. (2000). Can REBT be effectively used with people who have devout beliefs in God and religion? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 29-33.

36.

Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80-99.

37.

Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual well-being: Conceptualization and measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 11(4), 330-340.

38.

Frankl, V. (1967). Psychotherapy and existentialism. New York: Simon & Schuster.

39.

Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E-Revised and Single-Item Scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348-354.

40.

Gorsuch, R. L., & Venable, G. D. (1983). Development of an "age universal" I-E scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 22, 181-187.

41.

Hathaway, W. L., & Pargament, T. I. (1990). Intrinsic religiousness, religious coping, and psychosocial competence. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 423-441.

42.

Hunsberger, B., Alisat, S., Pancer, S. M., & Pratt, M.(1996). Religious fundamentalism andreligious doubts: Content, consciousness andcomplexity of thinking. International Journalof the Psychology of Religion, 6, 39-49.

43.

Idler E. L. (1987). Religious involvement and the health of the elderly: Some hypotheses and a test. Social Forces, 66, 226-238.

44.

Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

45.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1989). A psychometric analysis of the Allport-Ross and Feagin measures of intrinsic-extrinsic religious orientation. In M. Lynn & D. Moberg (Eds.), Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 1, (pp.1-31). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

46.

Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1997). A longitudinal study of changes in religious belief and behavior as a function of individual differences in adult attachment style. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 207-217.

47.

Lea, G. (1982). Religion, mental health, and clinical issues. Journal of Religion and Health, 21, 336-351.

48.

Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137-155.

49.

Pargament, K. (1977). The psychology of religion and coping. New York: Guilford.

50.

Peterson, L. R., & Roy, A. (1985). Religiosity, anxiety, and meaning and purpose: Religions' consequences for psychological well-being. Review of Religious Research, 27, 49-62.

51.

Piedmont, R. L., & Moberg, D. O. (2003). Research in the Social Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 13. Boston: Brill.

52.

Pollner, M. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30, 92-104.

53.

Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983). The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: Relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Nursing Studies, 32(5), 457-468.

54.

Ross, L. A. (1995). Spiritual dimension: its importance to patients' health, well-being and quality of life and its implications for nursing practice. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 32(5), 457-468.

55.

Ryan, R. M., & Rigby, S., & King, K. (1993). Two types of religious internalization and their relations to religious orientations and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 586- 596.

56.

Shin, D. C., & Johnson, D.M. (1978). A vowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 5, 475-492.

57.

Veenhoven, R. (1994). Correlates of Happiness (3 Vols.). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: RISBO, Center for Socio-Cultural Transformation.

58.

Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

59.

Witter, R. A., Stock, W. A., Okum, W. A., & Haring, M. J. (1985). Education and subjective well-being: a meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 6, 165-173.

한국심리학회지: 건강