Testing a Motivational Sequence Model on Dieting Behavior of Female College Students

본 연구는 동기를 위계 모형의 연속선상에서 구분한 Vallerand(1997)의 틀에 따라 자기결정이론과 계획된 행동 이론을 통합한 동기의 순서적 연계 모형을 섭식 조절 행동 맥락에서 검증하고자 하였다. 230명의 여대생을 대상으로 하였고, 제안된 모형의 적합도는 구조방정식 모델링을 사용하여 평가하였다. 분석 결과 χ2=463.779, df=263, ρ=.000 그리고 CFI=.900, TLI=.876, RMSEA=.058로 산출되어 전체 모형의 적합도는 수용할만한 수준이었다. 그러나 선행 연구 결과와는 달리 전반적 동기 수준에 해당되는 자기결정이론의 기본적인 심리적 욕구 만족은 맥락적 동기 수준에 해당되는 상대적 자율성 지표를 유의하게 예측하지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 상대적 자율성 지표는 상황적 수준에 해당되는 계획된 행동 이론의 태도와 지각된 행동 통제력을 유의하게 예측한 반면 주관적 규범은 그렇지 않았다. 마지막 부분에 본 연구의 의의와 제한점 및 추후 연구 방향에 대한 제언을 포함하였다.

keywords: motivational sequence model, self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, dieting behavior, 동기의 순서적 연계 모형, 자기결정이론, 계획된 행동 이론, 섭식 조절

Abstract

The present study tested a motivational sequence in which integrated self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior using Vallerand(1997)’s hierarchical model of motivation in dieting behavior. participants were 230 female college students, data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Goodness-of-fit for measurement model are reasonable level, χ2=463.779, df=263, ρ=.000 and CFI=.900, TLI=.876, RMSEA=.058. In contrast to precedent study, psychological need satisfaction of self-determination theory at global level did not predicted relative autonomy index at contextual level. Also, relative autonomy index significantly predicted attitude and perceived behavioral control of the theory of planned behavior, but not subjective norm. Finally, last section include limitations and suggestions for future direction.

keywords: motivational sequence model, self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, dieting behavior, 동기의 순서적 연계 모형, 자기결정이론, 계획된 행동 이론, 섭식 조절

참고문헌

안귀여루(2012). 사회문화적 압력이 여고생의 신체불만족과 이상섭식행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(4), 963-977.

이상선, 오경자(2004). 몸매와체중에근거한자기평가와신체 불만족이 여대생의 이상 섭식 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23(1), 91-106.

이민규, 한덕웅(2000). 섭식 억제, 사전음식섭취 및 사적자기주의에 따른 음식섭취 행동. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 5(2), 265-286.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (1998). Functional significance of psychological variables that are included in the theory of planned behaviour: A self-determination theory approach to the study of attitudes, subjective norms, perceptions of control and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 303-322.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of selfdetermination research(pp. 361-387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 992-1004

10.

Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Harris, J. (2006). From psychological need satisfaction to intentional behavior: Testing a motivational sequence in two behavioral contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 131-138

11.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

12.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.

13.

Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Evidence that intentions based on attitudes better predict behavior than intentions based on subjective norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 403-406.

14.

Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 220-247.

15.

Trafimow, D., & Sheeran, P. (1998). Some tests on the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 378-397.

16.

Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169.

17.

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(pp. 271-360). New York:Academic press.

18.

Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Dans E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The motivation and self-determination of behavior:Theoretical and applied issues. Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.19 No.1

여대생의 섭식 조절 행동에 대한 동기의 순서적 연계 모형 검증

Testing a Motivational Sequence Model on Dieting Behavior of Female College Students

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지: 건강