바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.19 No.1
Citation Share

Testing a Motivational Sequence Model on Dieting Behavior of Female College Students

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2014, v.19 no.1, pp.443-451
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2014.19.1.025


& (2014). Testing a Motivational Sequence Model on Dieting Behavior of Female College Students. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 19(1), 443-451, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2014.19.1.025
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study tested a motivational sequence in which integrated self-determination theory and the theory of planned behavior using Vallerand(1997)’s hierarchical model of motivation in dieting behavior. participants were 230 female college students, data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Goodness-of-fit for measurement model are reasonable level, χ2=463.779, df=263, ρ=.000 and CFI=.900, TLI=.876, RMSEA=.058. In contrast to precedent study, psychological need satisfaction of self-determination theory at global level did not predicted relative autonomy index at contextual level. Also, relative autonomy index significantly predicted attitude and perceived behavioral control of the theory of planned behavior, but not subjective norm. Finally, last section include limitations and suggestions for future direction.

keywords
motivational sequence model, self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, dieting behavior, 동기의 순서적 연계 모형, 자기결정이론, 계획된 행동 이론, 섭식 조절

Reference

1.

안귀여루(2012). 사회문화적 압력이 여고생의 신체불만족과 이상섭식행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 17(4), 963-977.

2.

이상선, 오경자(2004). 몸매와체중에근거한자기평가와신체 불만족이 여대생의 이상 섭식 행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 23(1), 91-106.

3.

이민규, 한덕웅(2000). 섭식 억제, 사전음식섭취 및 사적자기주의에 따른 음식섭취 행동. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 5(2), 265-286.

4.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.

5.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

6.

Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (1998). Functional significance of psychological variables that are included in the theory of planned behaviour: A self-determination theory approach to the study of attitudes, subjective norms, perceptions of control and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 303-322.

7.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

8.

Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). The need for competence. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of selfdetermination research(pp. 361-387). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

9.

Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 992-1004

10.

Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Harris, J. (2006). From psychological need satisfaction to intentional behavior: Testing a motivational sequence in two behavioral contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 131-138

11.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

12.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.

13.

Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Orbell, S. (1999). Evidence that intentions based on attitudes better predict behavior than intentions based on subjective norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 403-406.

14.

Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 220-247.

15.

Trafimow, D., & Sheeran, P. (1998). Some tests on the distinction between cognitive and affective beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 378-397.

16.

Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169.

17.

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(pp. 271-360). New York:Academic press.

18.

Vallerand, R. J., & Ratelle, C. F. (2002). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: A hierarchical model. Dans E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (Eds.), The motivation and self-determination of behavior:Theoretical and applied issues. Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy