The usefulness of the Concealed Information Test using an Eye Tracker

육보람; 현명호; 홍현기

doi:10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.004

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-070X
E-ISSN2713-9581
KCI

Home

OA Policy

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.20 No.1

Citation Share

The usefulness of the Concealed Information Test using an Eye Tracker

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581

2015, v.20 no.1, pp.53-67

https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.004

& (2015). The usefulness of the Concealed Information Test using an Eye Tracker. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 20(1), 53-67, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.004

copy

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the attentional bias of the guilty through the Concealed Information Test (CIT) using an Eye Tracker. In other words, we examined whether the CIT using an Eye Tracker could distinguish three different groups; a guilty group, an innocent group, and another innocent group with concealed information. We separated the participants into a guilty group of 19 individuals, an innocent group of 16 individuals, and another innocent group of 16 individuals with concealed information (e.g., which item was stolen). Participants were first asked to recreate the situation in which the crime had occurred, then were provided with relevant stimulus and irrelevant stimuli. Finally, we examined participants' eye movements following the stimuli using an Eye Tracker. The results showed that groups with information such as the guilty group and the innocent group with concealed information gazed at the irrelevant stimuli longer than at the relevant stimulus. There was also a difference between the groups in the number of eye movements and gazes at the relevant stimulus. These results indicated that individuals who commit a crime or have relevant information are conscious of the relevant stimulus and try to avoid it. Moreover, their eye movements were restrained. This study examined the accuracy and the validity of the CIT using an Eye Tracker. Thus, the study has significance in that it could contribute to an increase in the practical applicability of CIT.

keywords: Lie detection, Eye Tracker, Concealed Information Test(CIT), Eye movement, 거짓말 탐지, Eye Tracker, 숨김정보검사(CIT), 안구움직임

Reference

김수진, 이장한 (2013). 거짓 진술의 인지부하가 안구움직임에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27(2), 37-49.

박기원 (2012). 열영상과 숨긴정보검사를 이용한 모의범죄 거짓말탐지 연구. 중앙대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

엄진섭, 박광배 (2014). P300 숨긴정보검사에서 시행수가 검사결과에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회및 성격, 28(3), 61-79.

엄진섭, 손진훈 (2013). 단어와 사진자극을 사용한 P300숨긴정보검사에서 P300의 습관화. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집(p. 327).

엄진섭, 박광배, 손진훈 (2012). ERP와 동공 반응을 이용한 숨긴정보검사. 감성과학, 15(2), 259-268.

음영지, 엄진섭, 박광배, 손진훈 (2011). 숨긴정보검사에서 불안의 역할 – fMRI연구. 감성과학, 14(2), 227-234.

이병하 (2013). 자극 간 제시간격이 P300 숨긴 정보검사의 정확도에 미치는 영향. 충북대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

이병하, 황순택, 박광배, 손진훈, 엄진섭 (2013). P300 숨긴정보검사와 자극간 제시간격: 500ms와 800ms, 3000ms의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27(3), 87-107.

전충현 (2007). 용의자 진술에 대한 진위 탐지능력과 탐지능력 향상 방안 연구. 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.

10.

조은경 (2002). 거짓말의 특징과 탐지. 한국심리학회지:일반, 21(2), 33-65.

11.

한유화, 박광배 (2009). 폴리그라프 비교질문검사(comparison question technique: CQT) 기본 가정의 타당성에 대한 증거: 오류긍정 비율. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(2), 471-484.

12.

Bull, R. (1988). What is the lie-detection test? In A. Gale (Ed.) The polygraph test: Lies, truth, and science. London: Sage Publications.

13.

DePaulo, B. M., & Kirkendol, S. E. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 51-70). Dordrecht:Kluwer.

14.

DePaulo, B. M., LeMay, C. S., & Epstein, J. A. (1991). Effects of importance of success and expectations for success on effectiveness at deceiving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 17, 14-24.

15.

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.

16.

Ekman, P. (1988). Lying and nonverbal behavior:Theoretical issues and new findings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 163-176.

17.

Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York-London: Norton & Company.

18.

Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 225–234.

19.

Fukuda, K. (2002). Eye blinks: new indices for the detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 239-245.

20.

Gamer, M., Rill, H. G., Vossel, G., & Godert, H. W. (2006). Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76–87.

21.

Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., & Giesberg, B. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computer in Human Behavior, 25, 325-331.

22.

In-Albon, T., Kossowsky, J., & Schneider, S. (2010). Vigilance and avoidance of threat in the eye movements of children with separation anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 225-235.

23.

Kowler, E. (1995). Eye movements. In S. M. Kosslyn & D. M. Osheron (Eds.), Visual cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

24.

Leal, S., & Vrij, A. (2010). The occurrence of eye blinks during a guilty knowledge test. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16, 349–357.

25.

Mogg, K., Mathews, A., & Weiman, J. (1987). Memory bias in clinical anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96(2), 94-98.

26.

Peth, J., Kim, J. S. C., & Gamer, M. (2013). Fixations and eye-blinks allow for detecting concealed crime related memories. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 88, 96–103.

27.

Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Image of mind. New York: Freeman.

28.

Raskin, D. C. (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

29.

Schwedes, C., & Wentura, D. (2012). The revealing glance: eye gaze behavior to concealed information. Memory & Cognition, 40, 642-651.

30.

Twyman, N. W., Moffitt, K., Burgoon, J. K., & Marchak, F. (2010). Using eye tracking technology as a concealed information test. The 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 43(Proceedings of Credibility Assessment and Information Quality in Government and Business Symposium, pp. 48–54).

31.

Vrij, A., Edward, K., Robert, K. P., & Bull, R. (2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239-263.

32.

Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89-121.

33.

Zuckerman, M., Depaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-59). NY:Academic Press.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.20 No.1

The usefulness of the Concealed Information Test using an Eye Tracker

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology