The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical utility of the PSY-5 scales in the MMPI-2-RF and MMPI-2. According to the DSM-IV-TR, the sample consisted of cluster A, B and C personality disorder groups (N = 154). The results, based on multivariate ANOVAs showed that there were significant differences among the groups in the scales except for INTR (INTR-r). Post hoc analyses, Scheffe's and Dunnett's tests, revealed that cluster B scored higher than cluster C in AGGR (AGGR-r) and PSYC (PSYC-r). The scores of DISC (DISC-r) and NEGE (NEGE-r) in cluster B were higher than those of other groups. The results of the two PSY-5 scales were generally similar, but cluster C scored lower than cluster A in DISC of MMPI-2. The results suggest that the PSY-5 scale in the MMPI-2-RF can measure clinical range personality as much as the PSY-5 in the MMPI-2 with fewer questions. Implications and limitations of these findings are also discussed.
김석우, 조영기 (2005). 다변량분석. 서울: 교육과학사.
문경주, 육근영, 한경희, 김지혜 (2015). MMPI-2-RF 척도의 진단적 유용성: 양극성 장애, 주요우울장애, 조현병 집단의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 34(1), 103-123.
민성길 (2011). 최신정신의학. 서울:일조각.
박미정, 황순택, 남지숙 (2009). 성격병리 평가 도구로서의 PSY-5 척도의 구인타당도. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28(4), 1191-1206.
한경희, 김중술, 임지영, 이정흠, 민병배, 문경주 (2011). 다면적인성검사Ⅱ 매뉴얼 개정판. 서울: 마음사랑.
한경희, 문경주, 이주영, 김지혜 (2011). 다면적 인성검사Ⅱ 재구성판 매뉴얼. 서울: 마음사랑.
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ofMental Disorders Fifth Edition. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.
Arbisi, P. A. (2014). Introduction to th Special Section on the Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) and DSM-5 Trait Dimensional Diagnostic Systems for Personality Disorders:Emerging Convergence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 117-120.
Bagby, R. M., Sellbom, M., Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). Predicting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Ⅳ personality disorders with five-factor model of personality and the personality psychopathology five. Personality and Mental Health, 2, 55-69.
Finn, J. A., Arbisi, P. A., Erbes, C. R., Polusny, M. A., & Thuras, P. (2014). The MMPI-2Restructured Form Personality Psychopathology Five Scales: Bridging DSM-5 Section 2Personality Disorder and DSM-5 Section 3Personality Trait Dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 173-184.
Harkness, A. R., Finn, J. A., McNulty, J. L., & Shields, S. M. (2012). The Personality Psychopathology-Five (PSY-5): Recent Constructive Replication and Assessment Literature Review. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 432-443.
Harkness, A. R., McNulty, J. L., Finn, J. A., Reynolds, S. M., Shields, S. M., & Arbisi, P. (2013). The MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5-RF) Scales: Development and Validity Research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(2), 140-150.
Sellbom, M., Smid, W., De Saeger, H., Smit, N., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2014). Mapping the Personality Psychopathology Five Domains Onto DSM-IV Personality Disorders in Dutch Clinical and Forensic Samples: Implications for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(2), 185-191.
Tellegen, A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., McNulty, J. L., Arbisi, P. A., Graham, J. R., & Kaemmer, B. (2003). The MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical(RC)scales: Development, validation, and interpretation. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Verheul, R & Widiger, T. A. (2004). A Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence and Usage of the Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (PDNOS) Diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18(4), 309-319.
Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Graham, J. R., & Schenk, P. W. (2006). Incremental Validity of the MMPI-2 PSY-5 Scales in Assessing Self-Reported Personality Disorder Criteria. Assessment, 13(2), 178-186.