바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

특성분노와 의도-모호성이 타인비난과 운전분노에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Trait Anger and Intet-ambiguity on Other-blame and Driving Anger

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2004, v.9 no.3, pp.713-728
윤지혜 (중앙대학교)
현명호 (중앙대학교)
김인석 (삼성교통안전문화연구소)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 특성분노가 높은 운전자와 낮은 운전자를 대상으로 운전분노 반응과 Smith와 Lazarus(1993)의 인지평가 이론에서 설명하는 타인비난이라는 인지과정의 핵심관련주제를 비교하였다. 참가자들은 부정적인 결과가 발생할 수 있는 두 가지 운전상황을 평가하였다. 제시된 두 가지 운전상황 각각에서 분노를 유발하는 원인이 될 수 있는 상대 운전자의 의도는 명확하거나 모호하다. 특성 분노가 높거나 낮은 운전자는 두 가지 운전 상황 중 하나에 무선적으로 할당되었으며, 2×2 (특성분노×타인의도의 모호성)요인 설계로 분석되었다. 연구결과 특성분노가 높은 운전자는 특성분노가 낮은 운전자보다 동일한 운전관련 사건에 대하여 더욱 높은 분노경험을 하였으며, 상대 운전자를 더욱 적대적자로 평가하였다. 이와 같은 평가편향은 분노를 유발하는 사건의 고의성이 모호할 때, 고-특성분노 운전자들에게서 명확하게 드러났다. 운전분노 감소를 위한 심리학적 개입은 이러한 결과를 고려하여 적용되어야 한다.

keywords
운전분노, 특성분노, 의도-모호성, 타인비난, driving anger, trait anger, intent-ambiguity, other-blame, driving anger, trait anger, intent-ambiguity, other-blame

Abstract

This study compares driving anger and the cognitive processes of high and low trait anger drivers in terms of the core relational theme of blame identified in the Smith and Lazarus(1993) appraisal theory. Participants were asked to rate two driving scenario, both of which resulted in negative consequences. Two version of each scenario were produced, one depicting deliberate provocation intent and the other an event of ambiguous intent. Participants high or low on trait anger(determined by the raw scores on the Trait Anger Scale; Spielberger, 1991) were randomly assigned to one of two version, resulting in a 2×2(trait anger × deliberateness of the provoking event) factorial design. High trait anger drivers blamed the antagonist more, more readily identified another person as an antagonist, and experienced more angrily to the same events, than low trait anger individuals. These appraisal biases are more marked for high trait anger drivers when there is some ambiguity as to the deliberateness of the provoking event. Psychological interventions for driving anger reduction should consider the implication of these finding.

keywords
운전분노, 특성분노, 의도-모호성, 타인비난, driving anger, trait anger, intent-ambiguity, other-blame, driving anger, trait anger, intent-ambiguity, other-blame

참고문헌

1.

(1994) 자기 노출과 분노억제 경향에 따른 생리 정서 및 자기 이해 효과,

2.

(1983) Studies on anger and aggression:Implications for theories of emotion,

3.

(1983) Psychological mechanisms of aggression, Academic Press

4.

(1983) The experience of anger as a parallel process in the display of impulsive 'angry' aggression, Academic Press

5.

(1993) General anger:Characteristics and clinical implications,

6.

(2000) The Driving Anger Scale(DAS), Edwin Mellen Press

7.

(2003) Anger, aggression, and risky behavior : A comparison of high and low anger drivers.,

8.

(2001) Driving anger : Correlates and a test of state-trait theory. ,

9.

(1994) Development of a driving anger scale,

10.

(2001) Measuring road rage development of the propensity for angry driving scale ,

11.

(1980) Social cognition and children's aggressive behaviour,

12.

(1987) Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

13.

(1990) Hostile attribution biases in severely aggressive adolescents Journal of Abnormal Psychology,

14.

(1994) Reason and emotion in psychotherapy,

15.

(1995) Anonymity and aggressive driving behavior : A field study.,

16.

(1992) The appraisal model of coping An assessment and intervention model for occupational therapy American Journal of Occupational Therapy,

17.

(2001) Cognitive appraisals associated with high trait anger,

18.

Kassinove, H., , (1997) Development of a Russian state-trait anger expression inventory,

19.

(2001) Are Aggressive people aggressive drivers? A study of the relationship between self-reported general aggressiveness, driver anger and aggressive driving. ,

20.

(1998) Dimensions of driver anger aggressive and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation,

21.

(1987) Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping,

22.

(2001) High-trait and low-trait angry college students:A comparison of family environments,

23.

(1995) Driving anger as a health risk factor , NY

24.

(1978) Anger and coping with stress, Plenum Press

25.

(1990) Objective and subjective dimensions of travel impedance as determinants of commuting stress American Journal of Community Psychology,

26.

(2001) Anger on and off the road ,

27.

(1993) Discriminating emotions from appraisal-relevant situational information:Base line data for structural models of cognitive appraisals,

28.

(1995) The determinants for subjective emotional intensity,

29.

(1972) Anxiety as an emotional state In C Current trends in theory and research, Academic Press

30.

(1983) Assessment of anger Advances in personality assessment,

31.

(2002) Anger episodes in high-and low-trait-anger community adults ,

32.

(1974) Judgement under uncertainly:Heuristics and biases,

33.

(1999) Anger while driving,

34.

(2001) Interpersonal antecedents of driver's aggression,

한국심리학회지: 건강