바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.21 No.1

Citation Share

The ＂Systematizing Person-Group Relation(SPGR)＂ Method and its Application. A Study of Culture-based Differences in Team Dynamics

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.1, pp.19-34
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.1.002
Endre Sjøvold (Norwegian University of Science and Technology)
박재호 (영남대학교)
Endre, S. , & 박재호. (2007). . 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(1), 19-34, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.1.002

초록

본 논문의 연구 목적은 다음의 2가지를 가지고 있다：(1) “개인 집단 관계 시스템(SPGR)에 대한 개관, (2) 한국, 일본, 노르웨이, 미국 등 4개 문화의 근무집단으로부터 수집된 자료에 대한 문화비교적 분석연구 실시. 이상 4개 이문화에서 수집된 집단 자료는 SPGR 분석 방법인 “ 장 분석” 및 “지배적 행동(벡터) 분석”을 통해서 사회적 상호 작용 유형을 비교하였다. 본연구에서 얻은 결과에 의하면 미국 문화를 제외한 3개 문화 즉 노르웨이, 일본 및 한국은 상호 유사한 대인 평가 유형을 보여주었다. 추가적으로 리더십, 전략개발, 팀 빌딩 그리고 갈등 관리를 SPGR모델에 입각해서 다루고 마지막으로 4개 문화 집단에 대한 집단 역동을 논의하였다.

keywords
SYMLOG(System for Muliple Level Observation of Groups), SYMLOG(집단을 관찰하기 위한 다차원 시스템)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is twofold：first it gives an overview of the “Systematizing Person-Group Relation” (SPGR) model and method, and second, it presents an empirical study based on data collected from Korean, Japanese, Norwegian and American workgroups. The samples of groups are compared by their pattern of social interaction using two different SPGR analyses：the field and predominant behavior (vector) analysis. THE FIDINGS INDICATE THAT THREE CULTURE GROUPS SHOW SIMILARITY OF INTERPERSONAL EVALUATION HOWEVER AMERICAN GROUPS SHOW AN EXCEPTION. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to leadership, strategy development, teambuilding, and conflict resolution. In addition the typical group dynamics for the four different cultures is described.

keywords
SYMLOG(System for Muliple Level Observation of Groups), SYMLOG(집단을 관찰하기 위한 다차원 시스템)

참고문헌

1.

Bales R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In Parsons, Bales and Shils, Working papers in the theory of action, 111-161, Toronto：Collier- Macmillan.

2.

Bales R. F. (1955). Adaptive and integrative changes as sources of strain in social systems. In Hare, Bogatta and Bales (eds) Small Groups, 127-131 New York：Knopf.

3.

Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG a system for the multiple level observation of groups, New York：The Free Press.

4.

Bales R. F., & Couch A. S. (1969). The value profile：A factor analytic study of value statements. Sociological Inquiry, 39(1), 3-17.

5.

Bales, R. F. (1985). The new field theory in social psychology, International Journal of Small Group Research, 1(1), 1-18.

6.

Bales R. F. (1999). Social interaction systems theory and measurement. New Brunswick：Transaction Publishers.

7.

Belbin M. (1981). Management teams. Why they succeed or fail. London, UK：Butterwort-Heinemann.

8.

Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers New York：Basic Books.

9.

Chidambaram, L., & Bostrom R. P. (1996). Group devel- opment (I)：A review and synthesis of development models, Group Decision and Negotiation, (6), 159- 187.

10.

Csikszentmihalyi M., & Csikszentmihalyi I. S. (1988). Optimal experience：Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. New York：Cambridge University Press.

11.

Gersick C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams：Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.

12.

Granström K., & Stiwne D. (1998). A bipolar model of groupthink：An expansion of Janis’ concept. Small Group Research, 29, 32-56.

13.

Hackman J. R. (1983). A normative model of work team effectiveness (Technical report No 2). New Haven CT：Yale University.

14.

Hackman J. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M.D. Dunnette L.M. Hough (Eds), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed), 3, 199-297, Palo Alto CA：Consulting Psychologists Press.

15.

Hackmann J. R. (2002). Leading teams：Setting the stage for great performances. Boston：Harvard Business School Press.

16.

Hare A. P. (1985). The significance of SYMLOG in the study of group dynamics, International J of Small Group Research, 1, 38-50.

17.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences：interna- tional differences in work-related values, Beverly Hills：Sage.

18.

Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink, Boston：Houghton Mifflin.

19.

Jern, S., & Hempel, A. (1999). The Rise and Decline of Groups in Smågrupps-Processe Fog Samlingsvolym, 2, 1999, Linköping Universitet.

20.

Koenigs R. J., Hare S. E., & Hare A. P. (2002). SYMLOG reliability and validity San Diego：Symlog Con- sulting Group.

21.

Koenigs R. J., Hare S. E., Hare A. P., & Cohen M. A. (2005). Reliability and validity In A.P. Hare, E. Sjøvold, H.G. Baker, J. Powers, Analysis of Social Systems New York：University Press of America, 482-503.

22.

McGrath J. E. (1991). Time, Interaction and performance (TIP)：A Theory of groups. Small Group Research, 147-174.

23.

Mills, T. M. (1984). The sociology of small groups, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.

24.

Parsons, T. (1953). The AGIL model of group functions, in T. Parson, R. F. Bales, and E. A. Shils, Working papers in the theory of action, New York：Free Press.

25.

Parsons T., & Shils E. A. (1951). Towards a general theory of action, Harvard University Press.

26.

Polley, R. B. (1985). A general theory of polarization and unification., International Journal of Small GroupResearch, 1(2), 150-162.

27.

Poole M. S., & Hollingshead A. B (Eds) (2004). Theories of small groups：Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oaks：Sage.

28.

Sjøvold, E. (1995). Groups in Harmony and Tension, Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.

29.

Sjøvold, E. (2002). The SPGR manual, Oslo.

30.

Sjøvold E. (2005). Bions theory on group emotionality, in Hare, Sjovold, Baker & Powers Analysis of social interaction systems. New York：University Press of America.

31.

Sjøvold, E. (2005b). Group polarization in U.S. Korea, and Norway in Hare, Sjovold, Baker & Powers

32.

Sjøvold, E. (2005b). Group polarization in U.S. Korea, and Norway in Hare, Sjovold, Baker & Powers Analysis of social interaction systems. New York：University Press of America.

33.

Sjøvold E. (2006). Teamet-utvikling, effektivitet og endring i grupper, Oslo：Aschehoug.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책