바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.3

Citation Share

The validity study about criteria of reality monitoring

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.3, pp.75-87
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.3.005



& (2007). The validity study about criteria of reality monitoring. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 21(3), 75-87, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.3.005

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the applicability of the Reality Monitoring method in judging the authenticity of statements. Compared to other statement analysis methods, the Reality Monitoring method is relatively an easy way for investigators to judge which statement is closer to the truth in the process of judging the authenticity of written statements. For this purpose, participants were divided into Imaginary Group and Video Group. Video Group was regarded similar to a real case. Video Group were told to reminisce after watching a 5-minute crime case, and Imaginary Group were imagine to do so after listening to the case. Later, statements of the participants were analyzed based on the standards of the Reality Monitoring method. And the data were analyzed with Logistic Regression. The result showed that the accuracy rate of classifying the participants into Video Group was 73.6%, and the accuracy rate of classifying the participants into Imaginary Group was 84.8%. The overall accuracy rate was 79.2%. The results of this research show that the Reality Monitoring method is helpful in judging the authenticity of written statements.

keywords
Statement Analysis, Reality Monitoring, Authenticity of Statement, Criteria, Statement Analysis, Reality Monitoring, Authenticity of Statement, Criteria, 진술분석, 현실모니터링, 진실여부 판단, 평가준거

Reference

1.

김미영 (2005). 효율적인 수사면담을 위한 단축형 인지면담 개발. 경기대학교 석사학위논문.

2.

김미영 (2007). 진술분석. 한국범죄및수사심리학회창립학술발표대회논문집, 85-100.

3.

김성룡 (2006). 형사절차상 신문방법과 진술의 왜곡가능성에 대한 소고. 법학논고, 25, 93-113.

4.

김종률 (2002). 수사심리학. 학지사.

5.

이미선 (2005). 진술분석. 대검찰청 과학수사포럼, 23-43.

6.

이은진, 이수정 (1999). 증인의 기억 왜곡에서의 무관련 정보 효과. 한국심리학회지, 5(1), 3-14.

7.

정선희 (2006). 현실모니터링 기법에 의한 진술의 진실여부 판단. 경기대학교 석사학위논문.

8.

정선희, 강기영, 김미영, 전충현, 김시업 (2006). 범죄장면의 회상에 있어서 현실 모니터링 준거에서의 차이.한국심리학회 연차학술대회 발표논문집, 392-393.

9.

Adams, S. H. (1996). Statement Analysis; What Do Sus- pect's Words Really Reveal? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.

10.

Adams, S. H. (2002). Communication under stress: Indi- cators of veracity and deception in written narratives. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

11.

Alonso-Quencuty, M. L. (1992). Deception detection and reality monitoring: a new answer to an old question? In F. Lösel, D. Bender, and T. Bliesener(Eds.), Psychology and Law: International Perspectives (328-332). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

12.

Gene Klopf, M. A., & Tooke, A. (2003). Statement Analysis Field Examination Technique: A Useful Investigation Tool. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 6-15.

13.

Gödert, H. W., Gamer, M., Rill, H. G., & Vossel, G. (2005). Statement validity assessment: Inter-rater reliability of criteria-based content analysis in the mock-crime pardigm. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 225-245.

14.

Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, & Olsson, C. (2001). Fact or fiction? Adult' ability to assess children's veracity. Paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Psychology and law. lisbon, Portugal.

15.

Höfer, E., Akehurst, L., & Metzger, G. (1996). Reality monitoring: a chance for further development of the CBCA? Paper presented at the 6th European Conference on Psychology and Law. Sienna, Italy.

16.

Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.

17.

Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371-376.

18.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-29.

19.

Masip, J., Sporer. S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality moni- toring approach A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology Crime & Law, 11(1), 99-122.

20.

Santtila, P., Roppola, H., & Niemi, P. (1999). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children(aged 7/8, 10/11, and 13/14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye's model of Reality Monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6, 273-289.

21.

Sapir, A. (1987). Scientific Content Analysis(SCAN). Phoenix, Arizona: Laboratory of Scientific Inter- rogation.

22.

Schooler, J. W., Clark, C. A., & Loftus, E. F. (1988). Knowing when memory is real. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, and R. N. Sykes(Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues, Vol. 1: Memory in Everyday Life(83-88). Chich- ester: Wiley.

23.

Schooler, J. W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E. F. (1986) Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 171-181.

24.

Smith, N. (2001). Reading between the lines: An evalua- tion of the Scienific Content Analysis technique (SCAN). Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

25.

Sporer, S. L., & Hamilton, S. C. (1996). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of invented and self experi- enced events from early and late teenage years. Poster presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute. Port de Bourgenay, France.

26.

Sporer. S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied cognitive psychology, 11, 373-397.

27.

Sporer. S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. The Detection of Deception in Forensic Contexts. Cambridge University Press, 64-102.

28.

Steller, M., & Khnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin(Ed.), Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence(217-45). New York: Springer.

29.

Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 9, 9-36.

30.

Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander L., & Granhag, P. A. (2004). Assessing Children's Statements: The Impact of a Repeated Experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Congnive Psychology, 18, 653-668.

31.

Taylor, L. (1984). Scientific interrogation, 104. The Michie Company.

32.

Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille(Ed.), Credibility Assessment(101-119). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

33.

Vrij, A. (2000). The psychology of lying and the impli- cations for professional practice. Detecting lies and deceit. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 157-165.

34.

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analyses of verbal and nonverbal behavior in children and adults. Human Communi- cation Research, 30(1), 8-41.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy