바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.23 No.4

Citation Share

The Mediating effect of Cognition on Personality and Drunk Driving : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2009, v.23 no.4, pp.97-113
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.4.006

(2009). The Mediating effect of Cognition on Personality and Drunk Driving : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 23(4), 97-113, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2009.23.4.006

Abstract

Previous research has explored the domain of legal and educational prevention in regard of phenomena of accidents and injuries caused by drinking and driving. Most investigation of psychological factors attempt to distinguish characteristics of drunk drivers relative to the general driving populations. This study examined cognitive factors as a mediator between personality and drunk driving. Survey data from 174 convicted drunk drivers(single and multiple offenders) and 166 general drivers were analyzed using structural equation modeling. Two comparative models were proposed: full mediating model and partial mediating model. Result indicated that cognitive factors relevant to drunk driving fully mediated the relationship between personality and drunk driving and there is no significant difference between drunk drivers and general driving populations on supported structural model. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of cognitions and personality to improve short term cognitive interventions and long term counseling interventions.

keywords
drinking and driving, cognitive factors, personality factors, 음주운전, 음주운전 성격, 음주운전 인지, 음주운전 경향성

Reference

1.

경찰청(2003). 2004년 교통사고통계분석. 경찰청.

2.

김인석(2001). 음주 및 음주문제의 위험요인과 위약성 요인에 관한 구조방 정식 모델링. 중앙대학교 박사학위 논문.

3.

박선영(1998). 교통사범보호관찰대상자의 심리적 특성에 관한 연구. 교통안전공단.

4.

박선영(2002). 음주운전에 영향을 미치는 운전자의 개인적.사회적 요인에 관한 연구. 교통안전공단.

5.

신행우(1999). 성격특성이 음주문제에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지, 18, 105-122.

6.

이순철(1997). 운전자 행동의 심리학적 연구. 심리과학,6, 5-18.

7.

최상진, 손영미, 김정인(2001). 음주운전 태도 및 성격이 음주운전 경향성에 미치는 영향. 교통안

8.

한덕웅, 노명래(1996). 교통사고유발행동의 결정요인.도로교통안전관리공단.

9.

홍세희(2001). 구조방정식모형의 기초와 응용. 한국임 상심리학회 워크샵 교재.

10.

Bernard, W. (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review. 92(4), 548-573.

11.

Donovan, D. M., & Marlatt, G. A. (1982). Personality subtypes among driving-while-intoxicated offenders: Relationship to dringking behavior and driving risk. Journal of Cousulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 241-249.

12.

Donovan, D. M., Marlatt, G. A., & Salzberg, P. M. (1983). Dringking behavior, personality factors and high-risk driving. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 44, 395-428.

13.

Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., &Costa, F.M. (1991). Adolescent health behavior andconventionality-unconventionality: An extension of problem-behavior theory. Health Psychology, 10, 52-61.

14.

Gerge, K. J., Hepburn, A., & Fisher, D. (1986). Hermeneneutics of personality description. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1261-1270.

15.

Guerin, B. (1994). What do people think about the risk of driving? Implication for traffic safety interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 556-589.

16.

Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Mcdonnell, D. (1997). An examination of ationships between personality, attitudes, and cognitions relevant to lcohol-impaired driving tendencies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 415-419.

17.

Jones, A. W. (1996). Influence of age, gender, and blood alcohol oncenturation on the disappearance rate of alcohol from blood in drinking drivers, Journal of Forensic Science, 41, 922.

18.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1985). Stress and adaptation outcomes. America Psychology, 40, 770-779.

19.

Paul F. Tremblay, & Laura A. Ewart. (2005). The Buss and Perry Aggression Questionnaire and its relations to values, the Big Five, provoking hypothetical situations, alcohol consumption patterns, and alcohol expectancies. Personality and individual differences, 38, 337-346.

20.

Ross, H. L. (1985). Deterring drunken driving: An analysis of current efforts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 10, 122-128.

21.

Rotter, J. B. (1972). Some problems and misconceptions related to the construct of internal versus external locus of control of reinforcement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 779-884.

22.

Stacy, A., Newcomb, P., & Bentler, P. M. (1991). Individual difference in risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 222-234.

23.

Stacy, A., Newcomb, P., & Bentler, P. M. (1991). Personality, problem drinking, and drunk driving: Mediating, moderating, and direct-effect models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 795-811.

24.

Stacy, A., Newcomb, P., & Bentler, P. M. (1993). Cognitive motivations and sensation seeking b as long-term predictions of dringking problems. ournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12, 1-24.

25.

Turrish, R., & Jaccard, J. (1991). Judgement process relevant to drunk driving. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 222-235.

26.

Turrish, R., & Jaccard, J. (1992). Cognitive and attitudinal factors in the analysis of alternatives to drivng. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 405-414.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy