바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.25 No.2

Citation Share

언어적 억제가 결혼만족에 미치는 영향: 요구-철회 의사소통패턴의 매개효과

The Influence of Verbal Inhibition on Marital Satisfaction: Mediating Effect of Demand/Withdraw Communication Patterns

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.2, pp.35-49
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.003
김민선 (아주대학교)
신희천 (아주대학교)
김민선, & 신희천. (2011). 언어적 억제가 결혼만족에 미치는 영향: 요구-철회 의사소통패턴의 매개효과. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 35-49, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.2.003

초록

본 연구는 남편과 부인의 개별적인 언어적 억제의 수준 정도가 결혼만족에 미치는 개인 내 효과과 대인 간 효과를 자기효과와 상대방효과로 나누어 살펴본 후, 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴이 이를 매개하는지 확인했다. 본 연구의 주요한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 언어적 억제가 결혼만족에 미치는 영향을 검증한 결과, 남편의 언어적 억제가 남편의 결혼만족에 미치는 영향이 유의미하게 나타났다. 하지만 언어적 억제가 상대 배우자의 결혼만족에 미치는 효과는 미미했다. 즉 언어적 억제가 결혼만족에 대해 자기효과는 나타냈으나, 상대방효과는 나타나지 않았다. 둘째, 언어적 억제가 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴을 매개변인으로 결혼만족에 영향을 미치는지 검증한 결과, 남편의 경우 완전매개된 자기효과를 나타냈다. 즉, 언어적으로 억제하는 남편은 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴을 보이고, 그러한 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴은 자기의 결혼만족을 해치는 것으로 예측할 수 있었다.

keywords
언어적 억제, 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴, 결혼만족, 부부관계, 자기-상대방 상호의존성 모델, 자기효과, 상대방효과, 부트스트랩, verbal inhibition, demand/withdraw communication patterns, marital satisfaction, APIM, actor effect, partner effect

Abstract

This study addressed effects of verbal inhibition on marital satisfaction by importing demand/withdraw communication patterns between husband and wife as a mediator and confirming the results through the APIM(Actor-Partner Interdependence Model). The outcome of this study can be divided in two major points. First, by verifying how verbal inhibition affects the level of marital satisfaction, it was proven that verbal inhibition of the husband has an effect on his own marital satisfaction significantly but there were little partner effect. In other words, verbal inhibition has only an actor effect. Second, when deman/withdraw communication patterns between married couple was employed as a mediators ospecially males demonstrated a progress of actor effect through the complete mediation. Thus, we can predict that verbally inhibited husbands show wife-demand/husband-withdraw communication patterns and such a communication patterns hurt his own marital satisfaction.

keywords
언어적 억제, 요구-철회 의사소통 패턴, 결혼만족, 부부관계, 자기-상대방 상호의존성 모델, 자기효과, 상대방효과, 부트스트랩, verbal inhibition, demand/withdraw communication patterns, marital satisfaction, APIM, actor effect, partner effect

참고문헌

1.

김계수(2006). AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석. 서울: 한나래.

2.

노명희, 이숙(1991). 어머니의 결혼만족도 및 양육행동과 아동의 성취동기 간의 관계. 대한가정학회지,29(4), 181-206.

3.

백혜영(2007). 애정관계에서의 낙관성: 상대에 대한 긍정적 환상의 매개효과. 아주대학교 석사학위 논문.

4.

서정선(2007). 부부의 결혼만족에 미치는 용서의 자기효과와 상대방효과. 아주대학교 석사학위 논문.

5.

신현균, 장재윤(2003). 대학 4학년생의 성격특성과 성별에 따른 취업 스트레스 및 정신건강. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(4), 815-827.

6.

이정은(1999). 개인특성, 스트레스 및 부부 간 의사소통과 결혼만족도. 가톨릭대학교 석사학위 논문.

7.

임승락,권정혜(1998). 부부 간 의사소통 행동과 결혼생활 만족 -성차, 요구입장 차이 및 성격 특성의 영향- 한국심리학회 ‘98 연차대회 학술발표 논문집,109-124.

8.

전석균(1994). 정신분열증 환자의 재활을 위한 사회기술훈련의 효과성에 관한 연구. 숭실대학교 석사학위 논문.

9.

홍세희(2000). 구조방정식모형의 적합도지수 선정기준과 그 근거, 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 167-177.

10.

홍세희(2001). 구조방정식 모형의 기초와 응용. 미발간워크샵 교재.

11.

홍세희(2007). 구조방정식 모형을 적용한 다집단 분석및 매개효과 검증. 미발간 워크샵 교재.

12.

Berns, S. B., Jacobson, N. S., & Gottman, J. M.(1999). Demand–withdraw interaction in coupleswith violent husband. Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology, 67, 666-674.

13.

Broderick, C. B.(1983). Therapeutic triangle: Asourcebook on marital therapy. Lodon: Sage.

14.

Caughlin, J. P., & Huston, T. L. (2002). A contextualanalysis of the association betweendemand/withdraw and marital satisfaction.Personal Relationships, 9, 95–-119.

15.

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L.(2000). Aindividual difference explanation of why marriedcouples engage in the demand/withdraw patternof conflict. Journal of Social and PersonalRelationships, 17(4-5), 523-551

16.

Caughlin, J. P., & Vangelisti, A. L.(2005).Disconfirming communication and selfverificationin marriage: Associations among thedemand/withdraw interaction pattern, feelingunderstood, and marital satisfaction. Journal ofSocial and Personal Relationships, 22(1), 19-31.

17.

Christensen, A.(1988). Dysfunctional interactionpattern in couples. In P. Noller & M. A.Fitzpatrick(Eds.), Perspectives on maritalinteraction(pp. 31-52). Clevedon & Philadelphia:Multilingual Matters.

18.

Christensen, A. & Heavey, C. L.(1990). Gender andsocial structure in the demand/withdraw patternof marital conflict. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 59, 73-81.

19.

Christensen, A. & Shenk, J. L.(1991). Communicationconflict, and psychological distance innondistressed, clinic, and divorcing couples.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,59, 458-463.

20.

Christensen, A. & Sullaway, M.(1983). Assessmentof dysfunctional interaction pattern in couples.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45,653-660.

21.

Christensen, A. & Sullaway, M.(1984).Communication Pattern Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles.

22.

Courtright, J. A., Millar, F. E., & Rogers, L. E.(1979). Domineeringness and dominance:Replication and expansion. CommunicationMonographs, 46, 179–192.

23.

Giles, H., & Street, R. L., Jr. (1994). Communicatorcharacteristics and behavior. In M. L. Knapp &G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonalcommunication (2nd ed., pp. 103-161). ThousandOaks, CA: Sage.

24.

Goldberg, L. R.(1993). The structure of phenotypicpersonality traits. American psychologist, 48,26-34.

25.

Gottman, J. M.(1979). Marital Interaction:Experimental investigations. Orlando. FL:Academic Press.

26.

Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? Therelationship between marital processes andmarital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

27.

Gottman, J. M., & Krokoff, L. J.(1989). Maritalinteraction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,57, 47-52.

28.

Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2000). Thetiming of divorce: Predicting when a couple willdivorce over a 14-year period. Journal ofMarriage and the Family, 62, 737-745.

29.

Greenburg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M.(1986).Emotionally focused couples therapy. Clinicalhandbook of marital therapy(pp.253-276). NewYork: Guilford press.

30.

Heavey, C. L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N. M.(1995). The longitudinal impact of demand andwithdrawal during marital conflict. Journal ofConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 797–801.

31.

Heavy, C. L., Larson, B. M., Zumtobel, D. C., &Christensen, A.(1996). The communicationPattern Questionnaire: The reliability and validityof a constructive communication subscale.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45,796-800.

32.

Heavy, C. L., Layne, C., & Christensen, A.(1993).Gender and conflict structure in maritalinteraction: A replication and extension. Journalof Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16-27.

33.

Jacobson, N.S.(1989). The politics of intimacy.Behavior Therapist, 12(2), 29-32.

34.

Jacobson, N. S., & Margolin, G. (1979). Maritaltherapy: Strategies based on social learning andbehavior exchange principles. New York:Brunner/Mazel.

35.

Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N.(1995). Thelongitudinal course of marital quality andstability: A review of theory, method, andresearch, Psychological bullitin, 118, 3-34.

36.

Kenny, D. A.(1996). Models of non-independent indyadic research. Journal of Social and PersonalRelationships, 13(2), 279-294.

37.

Klohnen, E. C., & Mendelsohn, G. (1998). Partnerselection for personality characteristics: Acouple-centered approach. Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin, 24, 268–278.

38.

Rathus, S. A.(1973). A 30-item schedule forassessing assertive behavior. Behavior Therapy,4, 398-406.

39.

Rubin, L. B.(1983). Intimate strangers: Men andwomen together. New York: Harper & Row.Srivastava, S., MacGonial, K. M., Richards, J. M.,

40.

Butler, E. M., & Gross, J. J. (2006). Optimism inclose relationships: How seeing things in apositive light makes them so. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 91(1),143-153.

41.

Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N.(2002). Mediation inexperimental and nonexperimental studies: Newprocedures and recommendations, PsychologicalMethods, 7(4), 422-445.

42.

Swann, W. B., Jr., & Angulo, S.(2006).Female-demand, male-withdraw in precariouscouples. Manuscript in preparation, University of Texas at Austin.

43.

Swann, W. B., Jr., De La Ronde, C., & Hixon, J.G.(1994). Authenticity and positivity strivings inmarriage and courtship. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 66, 857-869.

44.

Swann, W. B., Jr., McClarty, K. L., & Rentfrow, P.J.(2007). Shelter from the storm? Flawedreactions to stress in precarious couples. Journalof Social and Personal Relationships, 24(5),793-808.

45.

Swann, W. B., Jr., & Rentfrow, P. J.(2001).Blirtatiousness: Cognitive, behavioral andphysiological consequences of rapid responding.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81, 1160-1175.

46.

Swann, W. B., Jr., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S.G.(2003). The precarious couple effect:Verballyinhibited men + critical, disinhibited women =bad chemistry. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 86, 1095-1106.

47.

Swann, W.B., Jr., Guinn, J. S., & Larsen, K.M.(2006). Tempting today, troubling tomorrow:The roots of the precarious couple effect.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,32(1), 93-103.

48.

Swensen, C. H., Eskew, R., & Kohlhepp, K(1981).Stage of family life cycle, ego development, andthemarriage relationship. Journal of Marriage and theFamily, 43, 841-853.

49.

Vogel, D.L., Murphy, M. J., Werner-Wilson, R. J.,Cutrona, C. E. & Seeman, J. (2007). Sexdifferences in the use of demand and withdrawbehavior in marriage:Examining the socialstructure hypothesis. Journal of CounselingPsychology, 54, 165-177.

50.

Weger, H., Jr.(2005). Disconfirming communicationand self-verification in marriage: Associationsamong the demand/withdraw interaction pattern,feeling understood, and marital satisfaction.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,22(1), 19–31.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책