바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.3
Citation Share

Culture and Gender Role Identity : Cross-cultural Comparative Study across Korea, China, Japan and US

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.3, pp.31-45
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.3.003

(2011). Culture and Gender Role Identity : Cross-cultural Comparative Study across Korea, China, Japan and US. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25(3), 31-45, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.3.003
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The constructs of 'Autonomy' and 'relatedness' as prototype of masculinity and femininity have something to do with the cultural dimensions of individualism-collectivism or independent self construal-interdependent self construal. In this study, gender and cultural differences on gender role identity(positive and negative aspects of masculinity and femininity) were examined. The major findings of this study conducted to college students in South Korea, China, Japan, and the US. are as follows: First, most respondents highly evaluated positive aspect of masculinity and femininity than negative aspect, and also femininity scores than masculinity scores. Second, the correlation analysis among positive and negative aspects of masculinity and femininity showed a different pattern of correlation depending on nation. In addition, the theoretical relationships that previous studies assumed were only supported by American men. Finally, Although significant differences according to both of country and gender were identified, country effect was appeared to be greater than gender effect. Specifically, American students showed high level of positive aspect of masculinity and femininity, by contrast, Japanese students showed high level of negative aspect of masculinity and femininity. Korean students had shown intermediate levels between Chinese and Japanese. And the degrees of positive gender role identity of Chinese were very similar to that of American. These results indicate that development of gender role identity is strongly influenced by the dominant sociocultural values and imply that it is important to focus on the cultural heterogeneity within a homogeneous culture in cross-cultural comparative study.

keywords
성역할정체감, 성차, 독립적-상호협조적 자기개념, 비교문화, gender role identity, gender difference, independent self construal-interdependent self construal, cross-cultural comparative study

Reference

1.

이누미야 요시유키, 김윤주 (2006). 긍정적 환상의 한일비교: 주체성 자기와 대상적 자기에 의한 설명.한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(4), 19-34.

2.

장수지 (2010). 긍정적-부정적 성역할정체감과 부부관계 적응의 관계: 사회적지지 제공 및 부부관계 효능감 의 매개효과 검토. 한국심리학회지: 여성,15(1), 1-23.

3.

장휘숙 (2002). 여성심리학(제2판). 박영사.

4.

한민, 이누미야 요시유키, 김소혜, 장웨이 (2009). 새로운 문화-자기관 이론의 국가 간 비교연구: 한국,중국, 일본 대학생들의 자기관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 49-66.

5.

Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence:An essay on psychology and religion. Skokie, IL:Rand McNally.

6.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory.Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

7.

Beck, A. T. (1983). Cognitive therapy of depression:New perspectives. In P J. Clayton & J. E.Barrett (Eds.), Treatment of depression: Oldcontroversies and new approaches, New York:Raven.

8.

Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychologicalandrogyny. Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.

9.

Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y-R. (2007). Where(Who)are collectives in collectivism? Towardconceptual clarification of individualism andcollectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1),133-151.

10.

Heine, S., & Lehman, D. (1995). Cultural variation inunrealistic optimism: Does the West feel moreinvulnerable than the East? Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 68, 595-607.

11.

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency andcommunion to well-being: Evidence and potentialexplanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412-428.

12.

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences:International differences in work-related values.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Kshima, E., & Hardie, E. A. (2000). Thedevelopment and validation of the relational,individual, and collective self aspects(RIC) scale.Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 19-48.

14.

Kashima, Y., Kim, U., Gelfand, M. J., Yamaguchi, S.,Choi, S., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender, andself: A perspective from individualism-collectivismresearch. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 69, 925-937.

15.

Kenrick, D. T., Trost, M. R., & Sundie, J. M. (2004).Sex Roles as Adaptations, An EvolutionaryPerspective on Gender Differences andSimilarities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Bell & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Psychology of Gender.NY, London: The Guilford Press.

16.

Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., Matsumoto, H., &Norasakkunkit, V. (1997). Individual andcollective processes in the construction of theself: self-enhancement in the United States andself-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology, 72(6), 1245-1267.

17.

Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and theself: Implications for cognition, emotion, andmotivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

18.

Matsumoto, D., Weissman, M., Preston, K., Brown,B., & Kupperbusch, C. (1997). Context-specificmeasurement of individualism-collectivism on theindividual level: The IC Interpersonal AssessmentInventory(ICIAI). Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology, 28, 743-767.

19.

Matsumoto, D. (2000). Culture and Psychology:People Around the World. (2nd Ed.), Wadsworth.

20.

Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement ofindependent and interdependent self-construals.Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 2p,580-591.

21.

Smiler, A. P., & Epstein, M. (2010). Measuringgender: Options and issues. In J. C. Chrisler &D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of GenderResearch in Psychology, 1, New York:Springer.

22.

Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L., & Stapp, J. (1974).The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: Ameasure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinityfemininity.Catalog of Selected Documents inPsychology, 4, 43-44.

23.

Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinityand femininity: Their psychological dimensions,correlates and antecedents. Austin: University ofTexas Press.

24.

Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K.(1979). Negative and positive components ofpsychological masculinity and femininity andtheir relationships to self-reports of neurotic andacting our behaviors. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 37(10), 1673-1682.

25.

Takano, Y., & Osaka, E. (1997). “Japanesecollectivism” and “American individualism”:Reexamining the dominant view. The JapaneseJournal of Psychology, 68(4), 312-327.

26.

Triandis, H. (1994). Culture and social behavior.New York: McGraw-Hill.

27.

Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine andfeminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. SexRoles, 36, 305-325.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy