바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

하루 동안의 개인내적 정서 변산성과 직무만족 및 삶의 만족간의 관계

The Relationship between Intraindividual Affect Variability and Job and Life Satisfaction during a Working Day

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2012, v.26 no.2, pp.117-136
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.2.008
홍수지 (성신여자대학교)
장재윤 (서강대학교)
김근영 (서강대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 직장인들이 근무하는 주중 하루 동안의 개인내적 정서 변산성과 직무만족 및 삶의 만족 간의 관계를 살펴보았다. 185명의 직장인들을 대상으로 일상재구성법을 이용하여 조사 전날 하루 동안의 에피소드와 그에 대한 정서 경험 측정치를 얻었다. 정서 상태 측정치의 표준편차로 정서 변산성을 계산하는 방식과 더불어 본 연구에서는 Moskowitz와 Zuroff(2004)가 제안한 공식을 적용하여 정서 변화의 두 가지 측면을 반영하는 변산성 지표들로서 강도 변산성과 질적 변산성을 구하였으며, 여러 정서 변산성 측정치가 직무만족 및 삶의 만족과 어떤 관련성을 갖는지를 고찰하였다. 연구결과, 하루 동안의 유인(긍정-부정) 정서의 평균과 더불어 핵심 정서 좌표 상의 회전(질적 변산성) 지표가 직무만족 및 삶의 만족과 유의한 관련성을 보였다. 반면 파동(강도 변산성) 지표는 두 만족 변인과 아무런 유의한 관련성을 보이지 않았다. 향후 정서의 개인내적 변산성의 유력한 지표로서 질적 변산성의 가능성에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
정서, 정서 변산성, 직무만족, 삶의 만족, 일상재구성법, affect, affect variability, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, Day Reconstruction Method

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate the relationship between intraindividual affect variability during a working day and job and satisfaction among Korean workers. Using the Day Reconstruction Method"(DRM), 185working people were asked to report episodes that occurred yesterday and their affective reactions corresponding to each episode. While most studies on within-person variability in affect has defined variability in terms of standard deviations of affective states, this study applied additional indicators of affect variability, pulse(intensity variability) and spin(quality variability) proposed by Moskowitz and Zuroff(2004). The results revealed that quality variability(spin) was significantly negatively correlated to both job satisfaction and life satisfaction, but neither job satisfaction nor life satisfaction did not have significant relationship with intensity variability.

keywords
정서, 정서 변산성, 직무만족, 삶의 만족, 일상재구성법, affect, affect variability, job satisfaction, life satisfaction, Day Reconstruction Method

참고문헌

1.

장재윤 (2010). 직무만족과 직무에서 경험하는 정서간의 관계: 빈도 가설과 긍정성 비율 가설의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(2), 275-295.

2.

장재윤, 유경, 서은국, 최인철 (2007). 일상재구성법(DRM)을 통해 살펴본 남녀 직장인과 주부의 삶의질. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 21(2), 123-139.

3.

Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134, 779-806.

4.

Beal, D. J., & Ghandour, L. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 526-546.

5.

Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 229-246.

6.

Brief, A. P., & Roberson, L. (1989). Job attitude organization: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 717-727.

7.

Clark, D. M., & Teasdale, J. D. (1982). Diurnal variation in clinical depression and accessibilityof memories of positive and negative experiences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 87-95.

8.

Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181-185.

9.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

10.

Diener, E., Larsen, R. J. (1984). Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 871-883.

11.

Diener, E., Suh E. M., Lucas R., & Smith H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 276-302.

12.

Eaton, L. G., & Funder, D. C. (2001). Emotional experience in daily life: Valence, variability, and rate of chance. Emotion, 1, 413-421.

13.

Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect; reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 662-676.

14.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.

15.

Feldman Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10-14.

16.

Fisher, C. D. (2000). Mood and emotions while working: Missing pieces of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 185-202.

17.

Fleeson, W. (2001). Towards a structure- and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 1011-1027.

18.

Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158-164.

19.

Gable, S. L., & Nezlek, J. B. (1998). Level and instability of day-to-day psychological well-being and risk for depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 129-138.

20.

George, H. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence. Human Relations, 53, 1027-1041.

21.

Hayes, S. C. (1989). Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control. New York: Plenum.

22.

Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Ruckstuhl, L. E. J. (1996). Relational frame theory and executive function: A behavioral analysis. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 279-306.). Baltimore: Brooks.

23.

Hayes, A. M., Harris, M. S., & Carver, C. S. (2004). Predictors of self-esteem variability. Cognitive therapy and research, 28, 369-385.

24.

Judge, T. A., Hulin, C. L., & Dalal, R. S. (2009). Job satisfaction and job affect. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The oxford handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.

25.

Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method, Science, 306, 1776-1780.

26.

Katzell, R. A., & Yankelovich, D. (1975). Work, productivity, and job satisfaction. New York: Psychological Corp.

27.

Kernis, M. H. (1993). Stability and instability of self-esteem. In R. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. New York: Plenum Press.

28.

Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C., Berry, A., & Harlow T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.

29.

Kernis, M. H., Granneman, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1989). Stability and level of self-esteem as predictors of anger arousal and hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 1013-1022.

30.

Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Nezlek, J. B., Dossche, D., & Tmmermans T. (2007). Individual differences in core affect variability and their relationship to personality and psychological adjustment, Emotion, 7, 262-274.

31.

Larsen, R. J. (1987). The stability of mood variability: A spectral analytic approach to daily mood assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1195-1204.

32.

Larsen, R. J., & Diener, E. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic―A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1-39.

33.

Larsen, R. J., & Kasimatis, M. (1990). Individual differences in entrainment of mood to the weekly calendar. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 164-171.

34.

Locke, E. K. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp.1297-1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.

35.

Lykken, D. T., & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186-189.

36.

Mardia, K. V. (1972). Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic Press.

37.

Miner, A. G. (2001). Antecedents, behavioral outcomes, and performance implications of mood at work: An experience sampling study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

38.

Morris, W. N. (1989). Mood: The frame of mind. New York: Springer.

39.

Morris, W. N., & Reilly, N. P. (1987). Toward the self-regulation of mood: Theory and research. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 215-249.

40.

Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893.

41.

Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1985). Cognition versus affect in measures of job satisfaction. International Journal of Psychology, 20, 241-253.

42.

Penner, L. A., Shiffman, S., Paty, J. A., & Fritzsche, B. A. (1994). Individual differences in intraperson variability in mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 712-721.

43.

Rice, R. W., Near, J. P., & Hunt R. G. (1980). The job-satisfaction/life-satisfaction relationship: A review of empirical research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 37-64.

44.

Rhodewalt, F., Madrian, J. C., & Chency, S. (1998). Narcissism, self-knowledge organization, and emotional reactivity: The effect of daily experiences on self-esteem and affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 75-87.

45.

Roberts, M. L., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1986). Intraindividual variability in perceived locus of control in adults: P=technique factor analyses of short-term change. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 529-545.

46.

Robinson, J. P. (1977). How Americans use time: A social-psychological analysis of everyday behavior. New York: Praeger, 1977.

47.

Rohland, B. M., Kruse, G. R., & Rohrer, J. E. (2004). Validation of a single-item measure of burnout against the Maslach Burnout Inventory among physicians. Stress and Health, 20, 75-79.

48.

Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145-172.

49.

Schimmack, U., & Diener, E. (1997). Affect intensity: Separating intensity and frequency in repeatedly measured affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1313-1329.

50.

Stone, A. A., & Shiffman, S. (1992). Reflections on the intensive assessment of stress, coping, and mood, Psychology and Health, 7, 115-129.

51.

Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S. S., & DeVries, M. W. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research, In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.26-39), NY: Russell-Sage.

52.

Stone, A. A., Smyth, J. M., Pickering, T., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Daily mood variability: Form of diurnal patterns of diurnal patterns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1286-1305.

53.

Tait, M., Padgett, M., & Baldwin, T. (1989). Job and life satisfaction: A reevaluation of the strength of the relationship and gender effects as a function of the date of the study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 502-507.

54.

Thoresen, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Barsky, A. P., Warren, C. R., & de Chermont, K. (2003). The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: A meta-analytic review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219-235.

55.

Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.

56.

Wessman, A. E., & Ricks, D. F. (1966). Mood and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

57.

Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs, and affective experiences. Human Resources Management Review, 12, 173-194.

58.

Weiss, H. M. & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes, and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1-7.

59.

Weiss, H. M., Nicholas, J. P., & Daus, C. S. (1999). An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 1-24.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격