바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

거짓말 탐지상황에서 나타나는 용의자의 심리특성 연구

Psychological Characteristics of Suspects Under Lie Detection Situation

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2013, v.27 no.3, pp.75-86
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2013.27.3.005
김고은 (중앙대학교 심리학과)
이상현 (대검찰청)
김재홍 (대검찰청)
최훈 (대검찰청)
방철 (대검찰청)
이장한 (중앙대학교)

초록

본 연구는 실제 범죄사건의 용의자를 대상으로 거짓말 탐지상황에서 나타나는 심리특성을 밝히고자 하였다. 이를 위해, 상태/특질 불안, 수치심/죄책감, 기만/조종, 그리고 방어성향 척도를 사용하여 일반인 집단 157명과 용의자 집단 146명의 심리특성을 비교하였으며, 추가적으로 용의자 집단 중 실제 거짓 유무에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위해 거짓 집단과 진실 집단으로 구분하여 분석하였다. 그 결과, 용의자 집단이 일반인 집단보다 상태 불안수준, 수치심 및 죄책감, 그리고 방어성향은 높고 기만성향은 낮았으나, 거짓 집단과 진실 집단 간의 차이는 없었다. 이를 통해, 거짓말 탐지상황에서 용의자가 일반인보다 높은 불안을 느끼며 방어적인 태도와 함께 낮은 기만성향을 보이려는 긍정적인 인상관리 전략을 지니고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 또한, 용의자 집단이 거짓 유무에 상관없이 동일한 심리상태를 지니고 있어 거짓말 탐지상황이 거짓말 탐지검사 결과에 영향을 미치지 않을 것으로 예측하였다.

keywords
거짓말 탐지, 거짓말 탐지검사, 불안, 심리특성, 인상관리, lie detection, lie detection test, anxiety, psychological characteristics, impression management

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to identify the psychological characteristics of suspects under lie detection situations. For this, the psychological characteristics between 157 ordinary people and 146 suspects were compared using scales which were measuring state/trait anxiety, shame/guilt, deceit/manipulation, and defensiveness. Additionally, to identify the difference according to existence of lying, this study divided suspects into lie and truth group and further analyzed differences of psychological characteristics between 2 groups. As a result, suspects showed significantly higher state anxiety, higher defensive tendency, and lower deceptive tendency than ordinary people, but there was no statistically significant differences of psychological characteristics between lie and truth group. This implies feeling higher anxiety and having positive impression management with high defensive and low deceptive tendency at the same time in suspects under lie detection situations. In addition, these results may predict that lie detection situations may not influence the results of lie detection test because suspects have similar psychological characteristics regardless of existence of lying.

keywords
거짓말 탐지, 거짓말 탐지검사, 불안, 심리특성, 인상관리, lie detection, lie detection test, anxiety, psychological characteristics, impression management

참고문헌

1.

김민경, 이장한 (2010). 기만/조종 척도개발 및 타당화 연구. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 12(3B), 1339-1349.

2.

김정택 (1978). 특성불안과 사회성과의 관계. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

3.

심종온 (1999). 수치심 경향성, 죄책감 경향성 및 사건귀인이 우울증상에 미치는 영향. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

4.

조은경 (2002). 거짓말의 특징과 탐지. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 21(2), 33-65.

5.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer-Verlag.

6.

Blasingame, G. D. (1998). Suggested clinical uses of polygraphy in community-based sexual offender treatment programs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 10(1), 37-45.

7.

Bull, R. (1988). What is the lie-detection test? In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: Lies, truth, and science. London: Sage Publications.

8.

Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., Ebesu, A. S., & White, C. H. (1994). Interpersonal deception: VII. Behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(4), 366-395.

9.

Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

10.

Davison, S. E., & Forshaw, D. M. (1993). Retracted confessions: Through opiate withdrawal to a new conceptual framework. Medicine, Science and the Law, 33, 285-290.

11.

DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schenkler, The self and social life. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979-995.

13.

Ekman, P. (2001). Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics and marriage. New York: Norton and Company.

14.

Gonza, L. F., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2001). The impact of individual differences on perception of lying in everyday life in a high stake situation. Personality and Individual Difference, 31, 1203- 1216.

15.

Granhag, P. A., & Ströomwall, L. A. (2004). The detection of deception in forensic contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (1996). Psychological evidence in court: Results from the 1995 survey. The Psychologist, 5, 213-217.

17.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, England: Wiley.

18.

Gudjonsson, G. H., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1982). False confessions: Psychological effects of interrogation, a discussion paper. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Deventer: Kluwer.

19.

Gudjonsson, G. H., & MacKeith, J. A. C. (1997). Disputed confessions and the criminal justice system. London: Institute of Psychiatry.

20.

Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Rutter, S. (1994). Psychological characteristics of subjects interviewed at police stations: A factor-analytic study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 5(3), 517-526.

21.

Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. R. S., & Pearse, J. (1993). Persons at risk during interviews in police custody: The identification of vulnerabilities. London: HMSO.

22.

Harder, D. H., & Zalma, A. (1990). Two promising shame and guilt scales: A construct validity comparison. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 729-745.

23.

Harder, D. W., & Lewis, S. J. (1987). The assessment of shame and guilt. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

24.

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. Open Criminology Journal, 3, 10-16.

25.

Hinkle, L. E. (1961). The physiological state of the interrogation subject as it affects brain function. In A. D. Biderman & H. Zimmer (Eds.), The manipulation of human behaviour. New York: Wiley.

26.

Inbau F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. P. (2001). Criminal interrogations and confessions. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.

27.

Leo, R. A. (2004). The third degree. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer.

28.

McFarland, L. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2000). Variance in faking across noncognitive measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 812-821.

29.

Mueller-Hanson, R. A., Heggestad, E. D., & Thornton, G. C. III. (2006). Individual differences in impression management: An exploration of the psychological process underlying faking. Psychology Science, 48, 288-312.

30.

Piwinger, M., & Ebert, H. (2001). Impression management: Wie aus niemand jemand wird. In B. Guenther et al. (Eds.), Kommunikationsmanagement: Strategien, wissen, lösungen. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

31.

Raskin, D. C. (1982). The scientific basis of polygraph techniques and their uses in the judicial process. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. Van Olst & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

32.

Raskin, D. C., Barland, G. H., & Podlesny, J. A. (1976). Validity and reliability of detecting of deception (Final Report). Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

33.

Razavi, T. (2001). Self-report measures: An overview of concerns and limitations of questionnaire use in occupational stress research. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.

34.

Redlich, A. D., & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Techniques and controversies in the interrogation of suspects: The artful practice versus the scientific study. In J. Skeem et al. (Eds.), Psychological science in the courtroom: Controversies and consensus. New York: Guilford Press.

35.

Shallice, T. (1974). The Ulster depth interrogation techniques and their relation to sensory deprivation research. Cognition, 1, 385-406.

36.

Simon, R. (1993). The psychological and legal aftermath, of false arrest and imprisonment. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 21(4), 523-528.

37.

Spielberger, C. D. (1977). Theory and measurement of anxiety states. In R. B. Cattell & R. M. Dreger (Eds.), Handbook of modern personality theory. New York: Wiley.

38.

Waid, W. M., & Orne, M. T. (1981). Cognitive, social, and personality processes in the physiological detection of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격