바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.1

Citation Share

Structural Relationships Among Goal-seeking Orientation, Self-regulated Motivation, and Self-Handicapping

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2014, v.28 no.1, pp.83-96
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.1.005


& (2014). Structural Relationships Among Goal-seeking Orientation, Self-regulated Motivation, and Self-Handicapping. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 28(1), 83-96, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.1.005

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the structural relations among goal-seeking orientation, self-regulated motivation and self-handicapping. One-hundred and eighty five college students completed instruments assessing goal-seeking orientation(growth-seeking, validation-seeking), self-regulated motivation(intrinsic, identified regulation, and introjected regulation) and self-handicapping. Structural analyses showed that growth-seeing contributed positively to intrinsic and identified regulation while validation-seeking contributed positively introjected regulation; intrinsic and identified regulation in turn contributed negatively while introjected regulation contributed positively to self-handicapping. Mediation analyses showed that intrinsic and identified regulation explained the direct effect growth-seeking had on self-handicapping while introjected regulation explained the direct effect validation-seeking had on self-handicapping.

keywords
목표추구 지향성, 자기조절동기, 자기구실 만들기, goal-seeking orientation, self-regulation motivation, self-handicapping

Reference

1.

김지경 (2008). 자기구실 만들기: 지능에 대한 신념 및 목표성향, 노력/결과중심의 부모 양육태도의 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1), 99-114.

2.

Chou, C., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications(pp.37-55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

3.

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R.(1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory(NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory(NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FI: Psychological Assessment Resources.

4.

Dykman, B. M. (1998). Integrating cognitive and motivational factors in depression: Initial tests of a goal-orientation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 139-158.

5.

Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and selfhandicapping. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 369-396.

6.

Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective wellbeing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058-1068.

7.

Garcia, T. (1995). The rola of motivation strategies in self-regulated learning. New Direct. Teach. Learn. 64, 29-42

8.

Glodberg, L. R. (1992). The development of marker for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.

9.

Jones, E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). Self-handicapping scale. Department of Psychology, University of Utah.

10.

Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion 5th. NJ: Wiley.

11.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.

12.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Selfdetermination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

13.

Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-Esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation:The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 443-464.

14.

Zuckerman, M., Kieffer, S. C., & Knee, C. R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping:Effects on coping, academic performance and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1619-1628.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy