바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.28 No.4

Citation Share

Development of the Perceived Threat to Elderly Group Scale(PTES)

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2014, v.28 no.4, pp.45-69
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.4.003



& (2014). Development of the Perceived Threat to Elderly Group Scale(PTES). Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 28(4), 45-69, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2014.28.4.003

Abstract

This research reports the development and psychometric properties of the Perceived Threat to Elderly Group Scale(PTES), a measure of the perceived threat to the elderly group for young and middle-aged adults. Based on Stephan's intergroup threat theory, this study assumed that young and middle-aged people would perceive a realistic threat and a symbolic threat to elderly group. To fill the need for a measure of young and middle-aged adults' perceived threat to the elderly group, we developed PTES. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted using two samples. Analyses identified a model with three factors: perceived political threat, perceived value threat, and perceived economic threat. Multi-group factor analysis demonstrated that PTES could be used across different age groups. Internal consistency for PTES subscale scores were good. Testing the association between PTES and the related constructs demonstrated that the PTES has good concurrent and incremental validity, and is almost unaffected by social desirability. The findings suggest that PTES is a reliable and valid scale that measure the extent which to young and middle-aged adults' perceived threat to elderly group.

keywords
노인세대 위협에 대한 인식, 실질적 위협 인식, 상징적 위협 인식, 노인차별주의, 통합된 위협 이론, 집단 간 위협 이론, perceived threat to elderly group, realistic perceived threat, symbolic perceived threat, ageism, integrated threat theory, intergroup threat theory

Reference

1.

경향신문 (2013. 2. 15). 18대 대선 50대 투표율 82% 최고... 女참여 높아. http://news.khan. co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?code=910110&artid=201302151539041.에서 자료 얻음.

2.

경향신문 (2012. 12. 20). 50대 투표율 89.9%... 박근혜 당선자, 2040서는 졌는데... 어떻게? http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?code=910110&artid=201212202208515.에서 자료 얻음.

3.

김민희 (2013). 포스터 발표: 4분과 사회 및 성격; 대학생의 노인 접촉 경험이 노인에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향: 노화불안의 매개효과. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표 논문집, 2013(1), 332-333.

4.

김 욱 (2003). 노인차별의 실태 및 관련요인에 관한 탐색적 조사연구. 한국노년학, 23, 21- 35.

5.

김주환, 김민규, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식모형으로 논문쓰기. 커뮤니케이션북스.

6.

김지연, 김민희, 민경환 (2012). 한국판 노인차별주의 척도의 타당화: 대학생 표본을 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 26(4), 89- 106.

7.

남석인 (2008). 남성노인의 차별경험이 노인인식 및 노년기 태도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 가족기능과 동년배관계의 매개효과 검증. 한국노년학, 28, 1297-1315.

8.

박경숙, 서이종, 김수종, 류연미, 이상직, 이주영 (2013). 세대 갈등의 소용돌이: 가족 경제 문화 정치적 매커니즘. 다산출판사.

9.

박재간, 이인수 (2001). 우리나라 노인의 정치참여의 과제-사회활동에 관한 국내외 고찰과 미래를 위한 제안. 한국사회복지학회 학술대회 자료집, 173-197.

10.

박재흥 (2010). 한국사회의 세대갈등. 한국인구학, 33(3), 75-99.

11.

배병렬 (2007). Amos 7에 의한 구조방정식 모델링. 서울: 도서출판 청람.

12.

서울경제 (2014. 3. 19). 실버세대 눈치보기. http://economy.hankooki.com/lpage/opinion/201403/e2014031918100171130.htm.에서 자료 얻음.

13.

서울경제 (2014. 8. 7).〔이노베이션 코리아 2014〕세대갈등 ‘공존의 길’은 있다. <2>돌고 도는 연금폭탄. http://economy.hankooki.com/ lpage/economy/201408/e2014080717202270070.htm.에서 자료 얻음.

14.

신광영 (2013, 2월호). 세대갈등, 대선 이후 사회갈등의 큰 축으로 급부상. 나라경제, 10-11.

15.

신창환 (2009). 연구논문: 복지국가의 세대간 형평성 담론의 정치경제학적 의미와 함의: 미국을 중심으로. 한국노년학, 29(2), 563-578.

16.

신홍임 (2013). 돈은 노인에 대한 부정적 태도에 영향을 주는가? 한국 및 독일 대학생 집단의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 27(2), 1-16.

17.

신홍임, 김민식 (2011). 노인 고정관념의 억제와 오기억: 목표점화 (goal priming) 및 망각지시의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 25(2), 17-34.

18.

연합뉴스 (2014. 9. 9). 빠르게 늙는 한국... 고령인구 증가속도 OECD 최고. http://news.naver. com/main/read.nhn?mode=LPOD&mid= sec&oid=001&aid=0007109818&isYeonhapFlash=Y.에서 자료 얻음

19.

윤 진, 조석미 (1982).「경산노화사실인지척도」의 구성연구: 한 교육측정적 접근. 한국노년학, 2, 5-15.

20.

이순묵 (1995). 요인분석I. 서울: 학지사.

21.

정보라 (2005). 사회적 바람직성의 구인 탐색. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.

22.

정 송, 이순묵, 이영선, 이민수 (2011). MMPI 단축형 우울척도 개발: 문항기반 요인분석의 사용. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 30, 811-830.

23.

한소영, 신희천 (2007). 커플 기본 심리적 욕구 중요성 척도의 다집단 요인분석과 잠재평균분석. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 19(2), 447-465.

24.

한정란 (2000). 우리나라 대학생들의 노화에 관한 지식과 태도에 대한 연구. 연세교육연구, 13, 191-206.

25.

한정란 (2003). 청소년들의 노인에 대한 태도 연구. 한국노년학, 23, 181-194.

26.

한정란, 김귀자 (2003). 부모의 노인 및 조부모에 대한 태도와 자녀의 조부모에 대한 친밀감: 농촌지역을 중심으로. 노인복지연구, 19, 61- 82.

27.

Abrams, D., Russell, P. S., Vauclair, M., & Swift, H. S. (2011). Ageism in Europe: Findings from the European Social Survey. London: Age UK. http://kar.kent.ac.uk/29733/.에서 자료 얻음.

28.

Aday, R., Sims, C., & Evans, E. (1991). Youth's attitudes toward the elderly: The impact of intergenerational partner. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 10, 372-384.

29.

Berrenberg, J., Finlay, K., Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. (2002). Prejudice toward people with cancer and AIDS: Applying the integrated threat model. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 7, 85-76.

30.

Binstock, R. (2010). From compassionate ageism to intergenerational conflict?. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 574-585.

31.

Bousfield, C., & Hutchison, P. (2010). Contact, anxiety, and young people's attitudes and behavioral intentions towards the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 36(6), 451-466.

32.

Bowling, A. (2007). Honour your father and mother: Ageism in medicine. British Journal of General Practice, 57, 347-348.

33.

Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. & Long, J. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp.136 -162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

34.

Cary, L., Chasteen, A., & Cadieux, J. (2013). Does age group identification differentially influence younger and older adults' intergenerational perceptions?. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 77(4), 331-346.

35.

Cottrell, C., & Neuberg, S. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 770-789.

36.

Cuddy, A., Norton, M., & Fiske, S. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267-285.

37.

Fabrigar, L., Wegener, D., MacCallum, R., & Strahan, E. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272-299.

38.

Farmer, C., Aman, M. (2009). Development of the childrens's scale of hostility and aggression: reactive/proactive(C-SHARP). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1155-1167.

39.

Fraboni, M., Saltstone, R., & Hughes, S. (1990). The Fraboni scale of ageims(FSA): An attempt at a more precise measure of ageism. Canadian Journal on Aging, 9, 56-60.

40.

Gaunt, R. (2011). Effects of intergroup conflict and social contact on prejudice: The mediating role of stereotypes and evaluations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 1340-1355.

41.

Hale-Smith, A., Park, C., & Edmondson, D. (2012). Measuring beliefs about suffering: Development of the Views of Suffering Scale. Psychological Assessment, 24(4), 855.

42.

Hummert, M. (1990). Multiple stereotypes of elderly and young adults: a comparison of structure and evaluations. Psychology and Aging, 5(2), 182-193.

43.

Hutchison, P., Fox, E., Laas, A., Matharu, J., & Urzi, S. (2010). Anxiety, outcome expectancies, and young people's willingness to engage in contact with the elderly. Educational Gerontology, 36, 1008-1021.

44.

Johnson, J., Ashburn-Nardo, L., Vincent Spicer, C., & Dovidio, J. (2008). The role of Blacks’ discriminatory expectations in their prosocial orientations toward whites and blacks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(6), 1498-1505.

45.

Kite, M.. & Johnson, B. (1988). Attitudes toward older and younger adults: A meta- analysis. Psychology and Aging, 3(3), 233-244.

46.

Kite, M., Stockdale, G., Whitley, B., & Johnson, B. (2005). Attitudes Toward Younger and Older Adults: An Updated Meta Analytic Review. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 241-266.

47.

Li, A., & Bagger, J. (2007). The balanced inventory of desirable responding(BIDR): A reliability generalization study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 525-544.

48.

Maddux, W., Galinsky, A., Cuddy, A., & Polifroni, M. (2008). When being a model minority is good... and bad: Realistic threat explains negativity toward Asian Americans. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(1), 74-89.

49.

Mueller_Johnson, K., Toglia, M., Sweeny, C., & Ceci, S. (2007). The perceived credibility older adults as witness and its relation to ageism. Behavioral Sciences and th Law, 25, 355-375.

50.

Nelson, T. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 207-221.

51.

Nelson, T. (2002). The psychology of prejudice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

52.

North, M. & Fiske, S. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 1-16.

53.

North, M., & Fiske, S. (2013). A prescriptive intergenerational-tension ageism scale: Succession, identity, and consumption (SIC). Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 706.

54.

Palmore, E. (1988). The facts on aging quiz. NY: Springer Publishing Co.

55.

Palmore, E. (2001). The ageims survey: First findings. The Gerontologist, 41, 572-575.

56.

Paulhus, D. (1998). Paulhus Deception Scales(PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7: User's manual. North Tonawanda, New York: Multi- Health systems.

57.

Pereira, C., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1231-1250.

58.

Peterson, P. (2002). 노인들의 사회 그 불안한 미래(강연희 역). 서울: 에코리브르. (원전은 2000에 출판).

59.

Pettigrew, T., & Tropp, L. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 93, 751-783.

60.

Renfro, C., Duran, A., Stephan, W., & Clason, D. (2006). The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(1), 41-74.

61.

Riek, B., Mania, E., & Gaertner, S. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(4), 336-353.

62.

Rupp, D., Vodanovich, S., Credé M. (2005). The multidimensional nature of ageism: Construct validity and group differences. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 335-362.

63.

Ryan, E., Jin, Y., Anas, A., & Luh, J. (2004). Communication beliefs about youth and old age in Asia and Canada. Journal of Cross-cultural Gerontology, 19(4), 343-360.

64.

Saarikallio, S. (2012). Development and validation of the brief music in mood regulation scale (B-MMR). Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 97-105.

65.

Sanders, G.., Montgomery, J., Pittman, J., & Jr., Balkwell, C. (1984). Youth's attitudes toward elderly. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 3, 59-70.

66.

Stephan, W., & Renfro, C. (2004). The role of threat in intergroup relations. Mackie, D. & Smith, E. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups, (pp. 191-207). NY: Psychology Press.

67.

Stephan, C., Stephan, W., Demitrakis, K., Yamada, A., & Clason, D. (2000). Women's attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 63-73.

68.

Stephan, W., & Stephan, C. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. Reducing prejudice and discrimination, 23-45.

69.

Stephan, W., Ybarra, O., & Morrison, K. (2009). Intergroup threat theory. Nelson, T. (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination. (pp.43-59). NY: Psychology Press.

70.

Wong, Y., Kim, B., Nguyen, C., Cheng, J., & Saw, A. (2014). The interpersonal shame inventory for Asian Americans: scale development and psychometric properties. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(1), 119.

71.

Wilson, A., & Ross, M. (2001). From chump to champ: People's appraisals of their earlier and present selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), 572-584.

72.

Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In Fiske, S., Gilbert, D., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp.1024-1083). Hoboken, NJ: Wile

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy