Facial inferences of social relations precited Korean elections better than did facial inferences of competence

& (2016). Facial inferences of social relations precited Korean elections better than did facial inferences of competence. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 30(4), 37-49, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2016.30.4.003

copy

Downloaded
Viewed

PDF Download

Abstract

We hypothesized that social competence inferred from faces would be a better predictor of Korean elections than competence judgments made about faces. In order to test the hypothesis, we recruited 92 Koran children (10 years of age & 46 females) and showed them 30 pairs of faces consisting of two candidates from either 2012 or 2016 national assembly elections. For each pair, participants indicated 1) the person who might be smarter (competence) and 2) the person who might have more friends (social competence). In support of the hypothesis, perceived social competence significantly predicted the election outcomes. However, perceived competence was not significantly associated with election outcomes in 2012 and had negative effects on election outcomes in 2016. The findings suggest that, when making social judgment, personal attributes like competence may not be important whereas social attributes like social relations may serve as a critical factor in interdependent cultures.

keywords: Face Perception, Political Elections, Impression Formation, Culture, Social Cognition, 얼굴 지각, 선거, 인상 형성, 문화, 사회 인지

Reference

이갑윤 (1997). 한국의 선거와 지역주의. 서울, 오름.

Antonakis, J., & Dalgas, O. (2009). Predicting Elections: Child's Play! Science, 323(5918), 1183. doi: 10.1126/science.1167748

Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 1085-1740). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill

Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y. -R. (2007). Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism. Psychological Review, 114(1), 133- 151.

Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Lee, J. M., & Bai, L. (2016). Culture Matters: The Looks of a Leader Are Not All the Same. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 570-578. doi: 10.1177/ 1948550616644962

Choi, I., & Choi, Y. (2002). Culture and self-concept flexibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1508-1517.

Choi, I., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 949-960.

Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 47-63.

Cogsdill, E. J., Todorov, A., Spelke, E. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2014). Inferring Character From Faces: A Developmental Study. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797614523297

10.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878

11.

Heine, S. J. (2005). Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to sedikides, gaertner, and toguchi (2003). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 531-538.

12.

Holtz, B. C. (2015). From First Impression to Fairness Perception: Investigating the Impact of Initial Trustworthiness Beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 68(3), 499-546. doi: 10.1111/peps.12092

13.

Imada, T., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Social eyes and choice justification: Culture and dissonance revisited. Social Cognition, 28(5), 589-608.

14.

Ji, L. -J., Nisbett, R. E., & Su, Y. (2001). Culture, change, and prediction. Psychological Science, 12(6), 450-456.

15.

Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., & Uchida, Y. (2007). Self as cultural mode of being. In S. Kitayama & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 136-174). New York: Guilford Press.

16.

Lenz, G. S., & Lawson, C. (2011). Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizens to Vote Based on Candidates' Appearance. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 574-589. doi: 10.2307/23024938

17.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.

18.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420-430.

19.

Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922-934.

20.

Na, J., Grossmann, I., Varnum, M. E. W., Kitayama, S., Gonzalez, R., & Nisbett, R. E. (2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(14), 6192-6197.

21.

Na, J., Kim, S., Oh, H., Choi, I., & O’Toole, A. (2015). Competence Judgments Based on Facial Appearance Are Better Predictors of American Elections Than of Korean Elections. Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/0956797615576489

22.

Na, J., & Kitayama, S. (2012). Will people work hard on a task they choose? Social-eyes priming in different cultural contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 284-290.

23.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291-310.

24.

Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(32), 11087-11092. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805664105

25.

Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., Jr., Ozono, H., Nakashima, S., Yoshikawa, S., & Watabe, M. (2010). Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 1-15. doi: 10.1037/a0017673

26.

Rule, N. O., Krendl, A. C., Ivcevic, Z., & Ambady, N. (2013). Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustworthiness from faces: Behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 409-426. doi: 10.1037/ a0031050

27.

Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Toguchi, Y. (2003). Pancultural self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 60-79.

28.

Suh, E. M. (2002). Culture, identity consistency, and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1378-1391.

29.

Sussman, A. B., Petkova, K., & Todorov, A. (2013). Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(4), 771-775. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.003

30.

Todorov, A., Baron, S. G., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008). Evaluating face trustworthiness: A model based approach. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(2), 119-127. doi: 10.1093/scan/ nsn009

31.

Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of Competence from Faces Predict Election Outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623-1626. doi: 10.1126/science. 1110589

32.

Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27(6), 813-833. doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813

33.

Todorov, A., & Porter, J. M. (2014). Misleading first impressions: Different for different facial images of the same person. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1404-1417. doi: 10.1177/0956797614532474

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.30 No.4

Facial inferences of social relations precited Korean elections better than did facial inferences of competence

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology