바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

도시 점화가 공정한 세상에 대한 믿음과 협력적 의사결정에 미치는 영향

Effects of priming city concepts on belief in just world and cooperative decision-making

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2017, v.31 no.2, pp.61-76
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2017.31.2.004
김남희 (충남대학교)
전우영 (충남대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구에서는 도시 점화가 공정한 세상에 대한 믿음과 협력적인 의사결정에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 연구 1에서는 도시 또는 시골에 대해 떠올리도록 한 후, 공정한 세상에 대한 믿음 척도에 응답하도록 하였다. 그 결과, 참여자들은 시골이 점화되었을 때보다 도시가 점화되었을 때 세상을 보다 공정한 곳으로 믿는 것으로 나타났다. 연구 2에서는 도시 또는 시골에 대해 무의식적으로 점화한 후, 죄수의 딜레마 과제를 수행하도록 하였다. 연구 결과, 시골 관련 개념보다 도시 관련 개념이 활성화되었을 때 보다 협력적인 의사결정을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 논의에서는 이러한 결과가 협력적인 의사결정에 시사하는 점에 대해 살펴보았다.

keywords
priming, belief in just world, city, rural area, cooperation, 점화, 공정한 세상에 대한 믿음, 도시, 시골, 협동

Abstract

Two studies examined the possibility that information relevant to the concepts of city and rural areas can influence belief in just world(BJW) and cooperative behavior. In study 1, participants were asked to imagine city(vs. rural) areas. In an ostensibly unrelated second task, participants responded to BJW scale. The results showed that participants perceived the world as a more fair place when the concepts of city(vs. rural) area were primed. In study 2, we used a scrambled sentence task(SST) for implicitly priming the concepts of city or rural areas. After completion of the priming procedure, participants were invited to a second, ostensibly separate experiment in which they were asked to make a decision in a prisoner’s dilemma game. The results showed that participants primed with the city concepts made more cooperative decisions than those who were primed with rural area concepts. The implications of present study for cooperative decision-making are discussed.

keywords
priming, belief in just world, city, rural area, cooperation, 점화, 공정한 세상에 대한 믿음, 도시, 시골, 협동

참고문헌

1.

강대현 (2004). 시민사회, 한국시민사회 그리고 시민교육. 한국민주시민교육학회보, 9, 57-76.

2.

김남희, 전우영 (2014). 도시와 시골 개념의 점화가 인상형성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 28(2), 141-159.

3.

김범준 (2002). 사회적 범주화가 지역감정 형성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 16(1), 1-17.

4.

김용훈, 류리나, 한성열 (2012). 도움행동을 높이기 위한 방안 모색: 공감과 공정성이 도움행동의도에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 18(3), 349-366.

5.

김은정, 강민규 (2011). 도시환경과 개인특성이 지역주민의 건강수준에 미치는 영향. 지역연구, 27(3), 27-42.

6.

김지경 (2006). 신뢰와 사회적 가치지향이 사회적 딜레마상황에서 협동행동에 주는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 20(3), 31-44.

7.

박상희, 김혜숙 (2009). Where are you from? 지역 고정관념에 따른 언어 기대 편파 (LEB). 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(2), 103-125.

8.

박효종, 이진희 (2005). 밀의 시민성에 대한 일 고찰. 아시아교육연구, 6(1), 201-224.

9.

신진욱 (2009). 시민. 서울: 책세상.

10.

유팔무 (2004). 한국의 시민 사회와 새로운 진보. 서울: 논형.

11.

전우영 (2013). 프라이밍: 나를 움직이는 무의식. 서울: 21세기 북스.

12.

조명래 (2001). 도시, 갈등, 시민성, 한국사회, 4, 31-82.

13.

조명래 (2011). 시민사회의 공간화: 지역시민사회에 관한 소고. NGO연구, 7(1), 1-15.

14.

한규석, 신수진 (1999). 한국인의 선호가치 변화-수직적 집단주의에서 수평적 개인주의로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 13(2), 293-310.

15.

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(1), 18-28.

16.

Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.

17.

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. NY: Basic Books.

18.

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. Reis & C. Judd(Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 253-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Barling, J., & Mendelson, M. B. (1999). Parents' job insecurity affects children's grade performance through the indirect effects of beliefs in an unjust world and negative mood. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(4), 347-355.

20.

Bratman, G. N., Hamilton, J. P., Hahn, K. S., Daily, G. C., & Gross, J. J. (2015). Nature experience reduces rumination and subgenual prefrontal cortex activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(28), 8567-8572.

21.

Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological review, 64(2), 123-152.

22.

Bulman, R. J., & Wortman, C. B. (1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(5), 351-363.

23.

Dalbert, C. (1993). Gefährdung des Wohlbefindens durch Arbeitsplatzunsicherheit: Eine Analyse der Einflußfaktoren Selbstwert und Gerechte-Welt- Glaube. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 1, 235-253.

24.

Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being, and coping with an unjust fate. In L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in a just world (pp. 87-105). New York: Plenum Press.

25.

Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally: About the personal belief in a just world scale’s validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.

26.

Dalbert, C., Montada, L., & Schmitt, M. (1987). Belief in a just world-validation correlates of 2 scales. Psychologische Beitrage, 29(4), 596-615.

27.

Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., & Johnson, B. S. (2007). Reciprocity and the belief in a just world. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 589-596.

28.

Edwards, M. (2009). Civil society. Polity.

29.

Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Reminders of secular authority reduce believers’ distrust of atheists. Psychological Science, 23(5), 483-491.

30.

Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., & Ardiccioni, R. (2012). Effect of watermarks as visual cues for guiding consumer choice: An experiment with restaurant menus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 617-619.

31.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1989). Elements of the Philosophy of Right [H. B. Nisbet, Trans.]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1821)

32.

Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002.

33.

Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154.

34.

Hobbes, T. (1968). Leviathan (C. B. Macpherson Ed.). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1651)

35.

Jain, R., Chiu, D. M., & Hawe, W. R. (1984). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer system (Vol. 38). Hudson, MA: Eastern Research Laboratory, Digital Equipment Corporation.

36.

Kay, A. C., & Ross, L. (2003). The perceptual push: The interplay of implicit cues and explicit situational construals on behavioral intentions in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 634-643.

37.

Kay, A. C., Wheeler, S. C., Bargh, J. A., & Ross, L. (2004). Material priming: The influence of mundane physical objects on situational construal and competitive behavioral choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 95(1), 83-96.

38.

Lederbogen, F., Kirsch, P., Haddad, L., Streit, F., Tost, H., Schuch, P., Wüst, S., Pruessner, J. C., Rietschel, M., Deuschle, M., & Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2011). City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature, 474(7352), 498- 501.

39.

Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.

40.

Lerner, M. J., & Somers, D. G. (1992). Employees’ reactions to an anticipated plant closure: The influence of positive illusions. In L. Montada, S. H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 229-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

41.

Locke, J. (1960). The Second Treatise of Government: In two treatises of government, (P. Laslett Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1698)

42.

McKay, R., Efferson, C., Whitehouse, H., & Fehr, E. (2011). Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1713), 1858- 1863.

43.

Montada, L., Schmitt, M., & Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In H.W. Bierhoff, R. Cohen & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.

44.

Peen, J., Schoevers, R. A., Beekman, A. T., & Dekker, J. (2010). The current status of urban‐rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121(2), 84-93.

45.

Pichon, I., Boccato, G., & Saroglou, V. (2007). Nonconscious influences of religion on prosociality: A priming study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(5), 1032-1045.

46.

Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303-315.

47.

Rousseau, J. J. (1968). The social contract, or principles of political right [H. J. Tozer, Trans.]. London: Penguin Classics. (Original work published 1762)

48.

Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803-809.

49.

Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of God predict cheating behavior. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 85-96.

50.

Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.

51.

Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556-568.

52.

Turiel, E. (2006). Thought, emotions, and social interactional processes in moral development. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 7-35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

53.

Walters, K., Breeze, E., Wilkinson, P., Price, G. M., Bulpitt, C. J., & Fletcher, A. (2004). Local area deprivation and urban–rural differences in anxiety and depression among people older than 75 years in Britain. American Journal of Public Health, 94(10), 1768-1774.

54.

Yilmaz, O., & Bahçekapili, H. G. (2015). When Science Replaces Religion: Science as a Secular Authority Bolsters Moral Sensitivity. PloS ONE, 10(9), e0137499.

55.

Zuckerman, M. (1975). Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(5), 972-976.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격