바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

한국판 다면적 성실성 척도(K-CCS)의 타당화 연구

The Validation Study of the Korean Version of Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scale(K-CCS)

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2017, v.31 no.4, pp.51-77
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2017.31.4.003
서자경 (연세대학교)
이기학 (연세대학교)

초록

본 연구의 목적은 성실성에 속하는 전체 하위 구성개념들을 폭넓게 측정하는 Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scale(Chernyshenko, 2002)을 한국어로 번안 및 타당화하여 성실성의 하위구조를 파악하고, 이를 토대로 성실성과 학업 성취, 진로 준비, 직무 성취의 관계에 대한 이해를 심화시키는 것이다. 이를 위해 우선 서울 소재 대학생 283명과 만 35세 미만 직장인 259명을 대상으로 탐색적 요인분석 및 확인적 요인분석을 실시하여 30문항으로 구성된 5요인 구조(성취, 신중성, 질서, 도덕, 책임)를 확인하였다. 이후 수렴 및 변별타당도를 검증한 결과 K-CCS의 모든 하위요인들이 기존 성격 5요인의 성실성과 유의미한 상관관계를 나타냈다. 한편, 준거관련 타당도를 검증한 결과 K-CCS의 총점은 모든 성취 변인과 유의미한 관계를 보였으나, K-CCS의 하위요인들은 성취 변인에 따라 그 유의성 여부와 상관관계계수가 달라졌다. 이어서 증분 타당도 검증 단계에서 성격 5요인의 성실성을 통제한 후에도 K-CCS의 총점은 대학생의 진로결정수준과 진로적응성, 직장인의 주관적 경력성공에 대해 유의미한 증분설명력을 보였다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 의의와 한계점에 대해 기술하였다.

keywords
성실성, GPA, 진로준비행동, 진로결정수준, 조직시민행동, 주관적 경력성공, 진로적응성, Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scale, Conscientiousness, Scale Validation, GPA, career success

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Korean version of Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scale(K-CCS), a measure developed to assess six facets of conscientiousness. The survey was conducted on 283 undergraduate students and 259 employees in Korea. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were evaluated to assess and validate the factorial structure of the scale, suggesting the five-factor structure(achievement striving, cautiousness, order, virtue and responsibility) with 30 items in result. Further analyses of convengent and discriminant validity show that all five factors show significant relationships with the IPIP Conscientiousness. Variation was also found between the facet scales with regard to criterion-related validity, which analyzed correlations between each of the facet scales and performance-related outcome variables such as GPA, career decisiveness, career adaptability, organizational citizenship behavior and subjective career success. Finally, incremental validity suggests that the total score of K-CCS explains career decisiveness, career adaptability and subjective career success above and beyond the effect of the IPIP conscientiousness. Based on the results, the implications and limitations of the study and suggestions for follow-up studies were discussed.

keywords
성실성, GPA, 진로준비행동, 진로결정수준, 조직시민행동, 주관적 경력성공, 진로적응성, Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scale, Conscientiousness, Scale Validation, GPA, career success

참고문헌

1.

고향자 (1993). 한국 대학생의 의사결정유형과 진로결정수준 분석 요구. 학생생활연구, 18, 57-76.

2.

김봉환 (1997). 대학생의 진로결성수준과 진로준비행동의 발달 및 이차원적 유형화. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

3.

김주환, 홍세희 (2009). 구조방정식 모형으로 논문쓰기. 커뮤니케이션 북스.

4.

김지연, 황매향 (2004). 실업자의 진로결정수준, 진로준비행동과 성격 5 요인과의 관계에 관한 연구. 상담학연구, 5(3), 637-646.

5.

유태용, 이기범, Ashton (2004). 한국판 HEXACO 성격검사의 구성 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 18(3), 61-75.

6.

윤수민, 이재식 (2010). 고용경쟁력과 조직시민 행동 사이의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 23(2), 297-315.

7.

장은주 (2002). 주관적 경력성공의 영향요인에 관한 연구. 서강대학교 박사학위논문.

8.

정지은 (2013). 대학생의 진로적응성과 사회적지지, 자아존중감 및 자기주도학습의 인과적 관계. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

9.

조애리 (1999). 대학생의 진로결정수준 및 진로탐색행동과 성격 5 요인의 관계. 서울대학교 박사학위논문.

10.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상. 19(1), 161-177.

11.

홍세희 (2006). 상담심리연구의 최근 동향과 연구방법론: 구조방정식모형의 이론과 응용. 한국심리학회 산하 한국상담심리학회, 2.

12.

Brown, T. A., & Moore, M. T. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling (pp.361-379). New York: The Guilford Press.

13.

Bacon, D. R., & Bean, B. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 35-42.

14.

Chernyshenko, O. S. (2002). Applications of ideal point approaches to scale construction and scoring in personality measurement: The development of a six-faceted measure of conscientiousness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

15.

Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., Drasgow, F., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Constructing personality scales under the assumptions of an ideal point response process: Toward increasing the flexibility of personality measures. Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 88.

16.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? an examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.

17.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

18.

Creed, P. A., Muller, J., & Patton, W. (2003). Leaving high school: The influence and consequences for psychological well-being and career-related confidence. Journal of Adolescence, 26(3), 295-311.

19.

Dudley, N. M., Orvis, K. A., Lebiecki, J. E., & Cortina, J. M. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of conscientiousness in the prediction of job performance: examining the intercorrelations and the incremental validity of narrow traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 40.

20.

Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004). Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(1), 67-80.

21.

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: Sage.

22.

Gaskin, J. (2016). “Name of section”, Gaskination's StatWiki. http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com

23.

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.

24.

Green, J. A., O’Connor, D. B., Gartland, N., & Roberts, B. W. (2016). The Chernyshenko Conscientiousness Scales: A new facet measure of conscientiousness. Assessment, 23(3), 374-385.

25.

Greenhaus, J. H., Parasuraman, S., & Wormley, W. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64-86.

26.

Hartung, P. J., & Taber, B. J. (2008). Career construction and subjective well-being. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(1), 75-85.

27.

Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2011). The role of adherence in the relationship between conscientiousness and perceived health. Health Psychology, 30(6), 797.

28.

Hirschi, A. (2010). The role of chance events in the school-to-work transition: The influence of demographic, personality and career development variables. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 39-49.

29.

Hofstee, W. K., De Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146.

30.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 32, 179-185.

31.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

32.

Humphreys, L. G.., & Montanelli Jr, R. G. (1975). An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10(2), 193-205.

33.

Jin, L., Watkins, D., & Yuen, M. (2009). Personality, career decision self-efficacy and commitment to the career choices process among Chinese graduate students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 47-52.

34.

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3, 114-158.

35.

Johnson C. D. (2001). In search of traditional and comtemporary career success. The University of Georgia.

36.

Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

37.

Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(3), 333-351.

38.

Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

39.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford publications.

40.

Larsen, R. J., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Personality psychology. Jastrebarsko: Naklada Slap.

41.

Ledesma, R. D., & Valero-Mora, P. (2007). Determining the number of factors to retain in EFA: An easy-to-use computer program for carrying out parallel analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(2), 1-11.

42.

Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 131.

43.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. D. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.

44.

Longman, R. S., Cota, A. A., Holden, R. R., & Fekken, G. C. (1989). A regression equation for the parallel analysis criterion in principal components analysis: Mean and 95th percentile eigenvalues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24(1), 59-69.

45.

MacCann, C., Duckworth, A. L., & Roberts, R. D. (2009). Empirical identification of the major facets of conscientiousness. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(4), 451-458.

46.

Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116.

47.

O’connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(3), 396-402.

48.

Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 775-802.

49.

Osborne, J. W., & Costello, A. B. (2009). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pan-Pacific Management Review, 12(2), 131-146.

50.

Osipow, S. H., Carney, C. G., & Barak, A. (1976). A scale of educational-vocational undecidedness: A typological approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9(2), 233-243.

51.

Paunonen, S. V., Haddock, G., Forsterling, F., & Keinonen, M. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures. European Journal of Personality, 17(6), 413-433.

52.

Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (1998). The structured assessment of personality across cultures. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 29(1), 150-170.

53.

Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524.

54.

Peabody, D., & de Raad, B. (2002). The substantive nature of psycholexical personality factors: A comparison across languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 983-997.

55.

Perugini, M., & Gallucci, M. (1997). A hierarchical faceted model of the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 11, 279-301

56.

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Impact of organizational citizenship behavior on organizational performance: A review and suggestion for future research. Human Performance, 10(2), 133-151.

57.

Rea, L. M., & Parket, R. A. (2005). Designing and conducting survey research. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

58.

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353.

59.

Roberts, B. W., Bogg, T., Walton, K. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., & Stark, S. E. (2004). A lexical investigation of the lower-order structure of conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 164-178.

60.

Roberts, B. W., Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2005). The structure of conscientiousness: An empirical investigation based on seven major personality questionnaires. Personnel Psychology, 58(1), 103-139.

61.

Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., & Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In M. Leary & R. Hoyle (Eds.). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp.369-381). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

62.

Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(4), 313-345.

63.

Roberts, B. W., Lejuez, C., Krueger, R. F., Richards, J. M., & Hill, P. L. (2012). What is conscientiousness and how can it be assessed?. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1315.

64.

Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 613.

65.

Savickas, M. L., & Porfeli, E. J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale: Construction, reliability, and measurement equivalence across 13 countries. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 661-673.

66.

Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005). A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58(7), 935-943.

67.

Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

68.

Tak, J. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Korea Form: Psychometric properties and construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 712-715.

69.

Widaman, K. F. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf & K. J. Sher (Eds.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology: Vol. 3, data analysis and research publication (pp.361-389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

70.

Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격