바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.32 No.4
Citation Share

고등학생이 지각한 부모의 과보호 양육 태도에 따른 도덕적 행동의 차이

Differences in moral behavior associated with perceived parental overprotection among high school students

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2018, v.32 no.4, pp.91-108
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.4.005
김혜정 (연세대학교)
정경미 (연세대학교)
이승아 (연세대학교)
김혜정, 정경미, & 이승아. (2018). 고등학생이 지각한 부모의 과보호 양육 태도에 따른 도덕적 행동의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 32(4), 91-108, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2018.32.4.005
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구는 부모의 과보호를 지각한 고등학생과 아닌 학생들의 도덕적 행동의 차이를 탐색하고, 도덕성 점화 메시지가 도덕적 행동을 촉진하는 데 효과적인지 검증하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 남녀 고등학생 1,035명에게 한국 과보호 양육 척도(Korean-Parental Overprotection Scale; K-POS)를 실시하고, 과보호 수준이 평균에서 1.5SD 이상인 학생(과보호 집단)과 평균 수준에 해당하는 학생(비과보호 집단)을 각각 33명씩 선발하였다. 그런 다음, 컴퓨터 과제를 통해 가상의 파트너에게 동전 개수를 자문해 줄 때 정확한 정보를 줄수록 자신의 이익이 줄어드는 이익 충돌 상황을 설정하고 두 집단의 도덕적 행동을 비교하였다. 그 결과, 과보호 집단이 비과보호 집단에 비해 상대방에게 속인 동전의 개수가 유의미하게 많았으며, 이와 같은 과보호 집단의 사익 추구 행동은 도덕성 점화 메시지 제시 후 유의미하게 감소하였다. 따라서 부모의 과보호 양육 태도가 고등학생 자녀의 도덕적 행동에 부정적 영향을 미칠 가능성이 시사되었으며, 도덕성 점화 메시지가 도덕적 행동을 촉진하는 데 효과적일 수 있다는 단서를 얻었다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 연구의 의의와 한계, 후속 연구를 위한 제언을 논의하였다.

keywords
parental overprotection, moral behavior, morality priming, high school student, conflict of interest, 과보호 양육 태도, 도덕적 행동, 도덕성 점화, 고등학생, 이익 충돌

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between perceived overprotection and high school students’ moral behavior, and also identified how morality priming influences their behavior. Korean-Parental Overprotection Scale (K-POS) was administered to 1,035 high school students. 33 students who reported high K-POS score (1.5 SD above the mean) were assigned to overprotected group and non-overprotected group of 33 students was randomly selected from the students reporting scores within the average range. Participants were asked to provide consultation to a partner under conflict of interest situation. The results showed that overprotected students were more likely to pursue private profits than control group. However, the pursuit of private profits in overprotected group significantly decreased after morality priming. These results implied that parental overprotection negatively affect adolescents’ moral behavior and priming has an effect on promoting moral behavior. Implications and limitations are further discussed.

keywords
parental overprotection, moral behavior, morality priming, high school student, conflict of interest, 과보호 양육 태도, 도덕적 행동, 도덕성 점화, 고등학생, 이익 충돌

참고문헌

1.

강민주 (2013). 쉼터거주 청소년과 가정거주 청소년의 도덕적 판단, 부모의 양육행동 및 외현적 문제행동과의 관계. 청소년학연구, 20(3), 1-30.

2.

김남호, 정경미 (2017). 이익충돌 상황에서 공개가 사익추구행동에 미치는 영향: 자발 공개와 강제 공개의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 사회및 성격, 31(1), 23-39.

3.

김수빈, 김지혜, 정경미 (2016). 이익충돌 상황에서 공개가 자문행동에 주는 효과: 자문가역할수행집단과 사익추구집단의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 22(1), 1-18.

4.

김종흠 (2012). 친환경 행동 및 친환경 유기농산물 구매의도에 대한 도덕적 규범의 활성화효과. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 13(2), 137-158.

5.

박병기, 임신일 (2010). 시험불안 관련변인의 메타분석. 교육심리연구, 24(4), 875-894.

6.

박아청 (1998). 과보호의 발달심리학적 의미에 대한 일고찰. 인간발달연구, 5(1). 53-72.

7.

박영신, 김의철 (2002). 한국사회의 교육적 성취:현상과 심리적 기반. 교육심리연구, 16(4), 325-351.

8.

방희정 (2000). 한국사회에서의 부모자녀 관계특성에 대한 발달심리학적 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 6(3), 41-65.

9.

윤성연, 정경미 (2014). 대학생 자녀가 지각한 부모의 과보호 양육수준과 자녀의 도덕성 간관계. 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 20(4), 307-328.

10.

이명희, 권지혜 (2009. 11. 5). 자녀 맴돌며 일일이 간섭...‘헬리콥터 부모’ 늘어난다. 국민일보. Retrieved from http://news.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0001357988

11.

이성희 (2009). 청소년이 지각하는 부모양육태도와도덕적 판단의 관계 연구. 부산대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.

12.

이용화, 김지현, 임소연, 채명옥, 이혜림, 오진아 (2014). 헬리콥터 양육에 대한 진화론적 개념분석. 아동간호학회지, 20(4), 237-246.

13.

이정훈 (2008). 유교문화권에서 부모의 양육행위가 자녀 도덕성 형성에 미치는 영향에 관한연구. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 27(3), 783-818.

14.

정경미, 윤성연 (2015). 고등학생용 한국 과보호양육척도(K-POS)의 개발 및 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 12(1), 1-26.

15.

정은영, 장성숙 (2008). 청소년이 지각한 어머니의 과보호 척도 개발: 탐색적 요인분석과확인적 요인분석 결과. 한국심리학회지: 상담및 심리치료, 20(2), 293-312.

16.

정종화 (1997). 부모의 양육태도와 아동의 도덕적 판단과의 관계. 순천향 인문과학논총, 3, 273-294.

17.

조인호 (2012). 남자 고등학생이 지각한 부모의과잉간섭적 양육태도와 도덕성의 관계. 미래교육학연구, 25, 95-130.

18.

최미혜 (2015). 부모의 헬리콥터형 양육태도가 대학생 자녀의 친구관계, 공동체의식에 미치는영향 연구. GRI 연구논총, 17(2), 181- 205.

19.

하영희, 김경연 (2003). 청소년의 도덕적 금지행동과 개인 및 가정환경 변인간의 인과관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(1), 17-30.

20.

Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed II, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141.

21.

Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning theory and personality development. New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

22.

Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., Olsen, J. A., Collins, W. A., & Burchinal, M. (2005). Parental support, psychological control, and behavioral control: Assessing relevance across time, culture, and method. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1-137.

23.

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. I. (2000). Studying the mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Barry, C. M., & Wentzel, K. R. (2006). Friend influence on prosocial behavior: The role of motivational factors and friendship characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 153-163.

25.

Bednar, D. E., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Peer referencing in adolescent decision making as a function of perceived parenting style. Adolescence, 38(152), 607-621.

26.

Biddle, B. J., Bank, B. J., & Marlin, M. M. (1980). Parental and peer influence on adolescents. Social Forces, 58(4), 1057-1079.

27.

Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action:A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review, 3(2), 178-210.

28.

Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2005). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. The Journal of Legal Studies, 34(1), 1-25.

29.

Carlo, G., Fabes, R. A., Laible, D., & Kupanoff, K. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior II: The role of social and contextual influences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(2), 133-147.

30.

Carlo, G., McGinley, M., Hayes, R., Batenhorst, C., & Wilkinson, J. (2007). Parenting styles or practices? Parenting, sympathy, and prosocial behaviors among adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168(2), 147-176.

31.

Church, B. K., & Kuang, X. J. (2009). Conflicts of interest, disclosure, and (costly) sanctions:Experimental evidence. The Journal of Legal Studies, 38(2), 505-532.

32.

Cline, F., & Fay, J. (1990). Parenting with love and logic: Teaching children responsibility. Colorado Springs, CO: Pinion Press.

33.

Eberly, M. B., & Montemayor, R. (1999). Adolescent affection and helpfulness toward parents: A 2-year follow up. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 226-248.

34.

Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1992). Emotional regulation, and the development of social competence. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Emotion and social behavior: Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 119-150). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

35.

Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., Kupanoff, K., & Laible, D. (1999). Early adolescence and prosocial/moral behavior I: The role of individual processes. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(1), 5-16.

36.

Gibbs, N. (2009, November 20). The growing backlash against overparenting. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1940697,00.html

37.

Goyder, J. (1986). Surveys on surveys: Limitations and potentialities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(1), 27-41.

38.

Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699-1702.

39.

Gunnoe, M. L., Hetherington, E. M., & Reiss, D. (1999). Parental religiosity, parenting style, and adolescent social responsibility. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 199-225.

40.

Hart, D., Atkins, R., & Ford, D. (1998). Urban America as a context for the development of moral identity in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 513-530.

41.

Hart, D., & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 223-233.

42.

Jung, W. S., & Villegas, J. (2011). The effects of message framing, involvement, and nicotine dependence on anti-smoking public service announcements. Health Marketing Quarterly, 28(3), 219-231.

43.

Kim, Y. H., & Cohen, D. (2010). Information, perspective, and judgements about the self in face and dignity cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 537-550.

44.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

45.

Krevins, J., & Gibbs, J. C. (1996). Parents use of inductive discipline: Relations to children’s empathy and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 67, 3263-3277.

46.

Larson, R., & Richards, M. H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Development, 62, 284-300.

47.

Leahy, R. L. (1981). Parental practices and the development of moral judgment and self-image disparity during adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 17, 580-594.

48.

Levy, D. M. (1938). Maternal overprotection. Psychiatry, 1(4), 561-591.

49.

Locke, J. Y., Campbell, M. A., & Kavanagh, D. (2012). Can a parent do too much for their child? An examination by parenting professionals of the concept of overparenting. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22(2), 249-265.

50.

Luebke, N. R. (1987). Conflict of interest as a moral category. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 66-81.

51.

Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633-644.

52.

Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 159-167.

53.

Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 10-29.

54.

Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2007). Characteristics of mother‐child interactions related to adolescents’positive values and behaviors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 675-686.

55.

Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down? Establishing helicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parental control during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1177-1190.

56.

Palmer, E. J., & Hollin, C. R. (1997). The influence of perceptions of own parenting on sociomoral reasoning, attributions for criminal behaviour, and self-reported delinquency. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(2), 193-197.

57.

Regnerus, M. D. (2003). Moral communities and adolescent delinquency: Religious contexts and community social control. The Sociological Quarterly, 44(4), 523-554.

58.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

59.

Sah, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2014) Nothing to declare: Mandatory and voluntary disclosure leads advisors to avoid conflicts of interest. Psychological Science, 25(2), 575-584.

60.

Saltzstein, H. D. (1994). The relation between moral judgment and behavior: A social-cognitive and decision-making analysis. Human Development, 37(5), 299-312.

61.

Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (1999). Relations of peer acceptance, friendship adjustment, and social behavior to moral reasoning during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(2), 249-279.

62.

Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative Influences on Altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.

63.

Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803-809.

64.

Smetana, J. G. (1999). The role of parents in moral development: A social domain analysis. Journal of Moral Education, 28(3), 311-321.

65.

Smetana, J. G., & Turiel, E. (2003). Moral development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 247-268). Oxford:Blackwell.

66.

Tavecchio, L. W. C, Stams, G. J. J. M., Brugman, D., & Thomeer-Bouwens, M. A. E. (1999). Moral judgement and delinquency in homeless youth. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 63-79.

67.

Thomasgard, M., & Metz, W. P. (1993). Parental overprotection revisited. Child Psychiatry &Human Development, 24(2), 67-80.

68.

Ungar, M. (2009). Overprotective parenting: Helping parents provide the right amount of risk and responsibility. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 37, 258-271.

69.

van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., ..., & Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter parenting: The effect of an overbearing caregiving style on peer attachment and self‐efficacy. Journal of College Counseling, 18(1), 7-20.

70.

Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (1999). Parenting style and the development of moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 28(3), 359-374.

71.

Welsh, D. T., & Ordóñez, L. D. (2014). Conscience without cognition: The effects of subconscious priming on ethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 723-742.

72.

West, T., Ravenscroft, S., & Shrader, C. (2004). Cheating and moral judgment in the college classroom: A natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 173-183.

73.

Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. (2011). The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 143-146.

74.

Yeh, C. J., & Huang, K. (1996). The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students. Adolescence, 31(123), 645-661.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책