바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.34 No.3

Citation Share

Effects of Regulatory Focus on Children’s Creativity

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2020, v.34 no.3, pp.59-72
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2020.34.3.003


& (2020). Effects of Regulatory Focus on Children’s Creativity. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 34(3), 59-72, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2020.34.3.003

Abstract

The present study examined whether simple environmental cues associated with regulatory focus influence creative thoughts of children(N=52). Specifically, it was predicted that promotion cues would elicit a risky, explorative processing style and, hence, facilitate creativity, whereas prevention cues would elicit a risk-aversive, vigilant processing style and, hence, restrain creativity. The results showed that promotion-focus triggered by the cheese maze task facilitated creative thoughts, whereas prevention–focus induced by the owl maze task did not influence creativity. The roles of environmental cues such as paintings and pictures in developing creative thinking are discussed.

keywords
조절초점, 창의적 사고, 향상초점, 예방초점, 동기, regulatory focus, creative thought, promotion focus, prevention focus, motivation

Reference

1.

교육부 (2015). 2015 개정 교육과정 총론 및 각론 확정․발표. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=294&lev=0&statusYN=C&s=moe&m=0204&opType=N&boardSeq=60753에서 2020. 7. 7일 인출

2.

김춘일, 조용태 (2004). 초등학교 고학년용 아동 창의성 검사. 서울: 교육과학사.

3.

성은현, 김누리 (2010). 소득과 거주지역이 아동의 창의성에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 발달 23, 67-84.

4.

송민경, 윤혜현 (2009). 자기조절초점유형에 따른 레스토랑 선택속성. 한국식품조리과학회지, 25, 663-670.

5.

양 윤, 전규민 (2009). 성향 및 상황 조절초점이 행동/무행동에 대한 소비자 후회에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 소비자․광고, 10, 513- 533.

6.

유경훈, 강순미 (2009). 아동의 창의성에 부모성격, 양육태도, 가정의 분위기가 미치는 영향. 아동교육, 18, 121-133.

7.

이송연, 안도희 (2015). 아동의 창의성 발현을 위한 부모․교사교육 국내 연구동향 탐색. 한국교육문제연구, 33, 177-201.

8.

이운경, 김민주, 윤기봉 (2019). 부모, 교사 및 또래와의 관계가 아동의 창의성에 미치는 영향: 자기결정성의 매개적 역할. 아동학회지 40, 85-98.

9.

임웅 (2005). 아동의 창의성에 대한 보상의 작용 과정에 대한 연구. 아동학회지, 26, 385-392.

10.

전승우, 차태훈, 이영화 (2008). 정치적 이념 성향이 정치광고의 광고태도에 미치는 영향: 조절초점의 역할을 중심으로. 광고연구, 81, 251-283.

11.

최인수, 이현주, 이화선 (2005). 아동의 창의성과 성격 및 지능간의 관계: 창의성검사, Holland검사, Raven검사를 중심으로. 교육심리연구 19, 135-157.

12.

Donovan, L., Green, T. D., & Mason, C. (2014). Examining the 21st century class-room: Developing an innovation configuration map. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50, 161-178.

13.

Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive test. Princeton. NJ: Educational Testing Service.

14.

Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., Butterback, E. B., & Sassenberg, K. (2005). Automatic effects of deviancy cues on creative cognition. European journal of Social Psychology, 35, 345-359.

15.

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477-492.

16.

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.

17.

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2002). Influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41-55.

18.

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.

19.

Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.

20.

Higgins, E. T. (2008). Regulatory fit. In J. Shah, & W. Gardner. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 356-370). Guilford Publication, New York.

21.

Higgins, E. T., Shah, J. Y., & Friedman, R. S. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.

22.

Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.

23.

Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K. Choi, I, & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310.

24.

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). “21st-Century” skills: Not new, but a worthy challenge. American Educator, Spring, 17-20.

25.

Rouanet, H., & Lépine, D. (1970). Comparison between treatments in a repeated-measurement design. ANOVA and multivariate methods. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 147-163.

26.

Schweinsberg, M., Madan, N., Vianello, M., Sommer, S. A., Jordan, J., Tierney, W., ..., & Srinivasan, M. (2016). The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 55-67.

27.

Shah, J. Y., & Gardner, W. L. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of motivation science. Guilford.

28.

Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.) (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA. MIT Press.

29.

Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy