바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Positive verbal feedback, value of task, and intrinsic motivation

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
1988, v.4 no.1, pp.263-287
Shin-Ho Ahn (Pusan National University)
Sang-Hee Lee (Pusan National University)
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Deci's cognitive evaluation theory on intrinsic motivation asserts that the informational aspect of external events facilitates the internal perceived locus of causality and perceived competence, thus enhancing intrinsic motivation ; but that the controlling aspect facilitates the external perceived locus of causality, thus underminig intrinsic motivation. Positive verbal feedback(or praise) can be thought to have informational aspect. But Deci's several studies showed that, after praise, only male subjects enhanced their intrinsic motivation, but that female subjects undermined their intrinsic motivation. Deci explained these results that females interprete the praise as controlling, because of traditional sex-role socialization process. Zinser et al.(1982) reported similar results. The tasks used in the above experiments(Soma puzzle and Hidden Figure Test), however, seemed to be male-relevant in nature, and thus, the credibility of positive feedback(which informed that the subject were (the) most excellent on that task) was likely to be very low especially for female subjects. It is questioned whether if credibility of positive feedback is high, there is any sex differences in the role of informational aspect of positive verbal feedback. The studies on intrinsic motivation reported so far has ignored the importance of the individual's perceived value for the task. Praise for one's performance of the task with perceived value may have more influence on enhancing intrinsic motivation. The hypothesis of this, study is that the praise for the performance of the task valued by each sex can enhance each sex's intrinsic motivation for the task. It was assumed that Jigsaw puzzle, which showed very beautiful scenery when completed, would be valued by females, and that Tangram, which asked subjects to configurate given figures with geometric forms(triangles and rectangles), would be valued by males. 42male and 41 female college students did these two's kinds of puzzle, and received (1} no feedback, or (2) neutral feedback for one task(they were told that their performance was the same as, specifically, just above, the average), and positive feedback for the other task. Independent variables were the presence of the praise for the performance on the task(no praise, praise for the Jigsaw puzzle, or praise for the Tangram), subject sex(male, or female), and task order(Jigsaw puzzle prior to Tangram, or Tangrsam prior to Jigsaw puzzle). Dependent variables were duration that subject did each puzzle in free choice period, and self-reported interest in each task. The results of this study were as follows : (1) Praising females for the performance of Jigsaw puzzle enhanced intrinsic motivation, compared with no-feedback females, Tangram-praised females, or Jigsaw-praised males. (2) Praising males for the performance of Tangram did not enhance intrinsic motivation, compared with no-feedback males, Jigsaw-praised males, or Tangram-praised females. These results supported the hypothesis of this study only for females. Tangram did not seem to be as much valued by males as this study assumed.

keywords

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology