바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.12 No.1

Citation Share

Effects of Social Exclusion/Inclusion and Causal Attribution upon Social Information Processing and Punishment Behavior

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.1, pp.131-151
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.1.008


& (2007). Effects of Social Exclusion/Inclusion and Causal Attribution upon Social Information Processing and Punishment Behavior. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 12(1), 131-151, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.1.008

Abstract

The present study investigated how social exclusion/inclusion and individuals' causal attribution affect social information processing and subsequent behavior. A total of 60 Korean college students participated in a study that employed a 2(Social Exclusion/Social Inclusion) X 2(Internal Attribution/External Attribution) between subjects design. Drawing on previous research demonstrating selective memory for social information on the part of the excluded (Gardner, Pickett, & Brewer, 2000), the present study contrasted two opposing viewpoints regarding how individuals process social information after experiencing social inclusion or exclusion. Consistent with the research hypothesis, result indicated that selective memory for social information was pronounced more when individuals experienced social inclusion rather than social exclusion. Moreover, a significant interaction effect indicated that the included assigned higher levels of punishment to a target person than did the excluded in the external attribution condition. In contrast, no difference was found between the included and the excluded in the internal attribution condition. These results were interpreted in terms of an assimilative effect in social information processing. Implications of the study and suggestions for future research are also discussed.

keywords
Social exclusion/inclusion, Attribution, Social information processing, Punishment behavior., Social exclusion/inclusion, Attribution, Social information processing, Punishment behavior., 사회적 배척, 사회적 수용, 귀인, 사회적 정보처리, 처벌행동†이 논문은 성균관대학교 2005년도 성균학술연구비의 지원으로 연구되었음. 이 논문에 보고된 자료는 교신저자의 지도로 수행된 조성숙의 석사학위 청구논문의 일부임. ‡교신저자(Corresponding author) : 최훈석, (110-745) 서울특별시 종로구 명륜3가 53 성균관대학교 심리학과, 전화 : 02-760-0494. E-mail : hchoi@skku.edu인간이 타인들

Reference

1.

김혜원, 이해경(2000). 집단괴롭힘의 가해와 피해행동에 영향을 미치는 사회적, 심리적 변인들. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14(1), 45-64.

2.

이춘재, 곽금주(1999). 학교에서의 집단따돌림: 실태, 특성 및 대책. 서울: 집문당.

3.

이해경, 김혜원(2001). 초등학생들의 집단괴롭힘 가해행동과 피해행동에 대한 사회적, 심리적 예측변인들: 학년과 성별을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 15(1), 117-138.

4.

정선진, 이은해, 고윤주, 김영신 (2001). 학령기 행동문제의 위험요인과 보호요인으로서의 또래관계. 아동학회지, 22(3), 91-106.

5.

최훈석, 조성숙, 용정순, 권영미(2006). 사회적 배척과 수용 경험이 개인의 정서, 공격행동 및 과업동기에 미치는 영향. 한국 사회 및 성격 심리학회 춘계학술대회 논문집, 51-52.

6.

한종철, 이민아, 이기학(1999). 상담과 심리치료: 초등학생의 집단 괴롭힘 개입 유형과 심리적 특성과의 관계 - 자아존중감 , 우울 , 불안을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료, 11(1), 95-108.

7.

Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. M. (2005). A social psychological framework for understanding social inclusion and exclusion. In D. Abrams, M. A. Hogg, & J. M. Marques (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. New York: Psychology Press.

8.

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230-244.

9.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

10.

Baumeister, R. F., Dewall, C. N., Ciarocco, N. J., & Twenge, J. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589-604.

11.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motive. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.

12.

Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 817-827.

13.

Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. L. (1996). Who is this "we"?: Level of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.

14.

Buckley, K., Winkel, R., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14-28.

15.

Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

16.

Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L. & Brewer, M. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486-496.

17.

Gardner, W. L., Pickett, C. L., & Knowles, M. (2005). Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. Von Hippel (Eds.), The Social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227-241). New York: Psychology Press.

18.

Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp.133-168). New York: Guilford Press.

19.

Johnson, R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G. (2006). When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 175-201.

20.

Kuhnen, U., & Oyserman, D. (2002). Thinking about the self influences thinking in general: cognitive consequences of salient self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 492-499.

21.

Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1-62). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

22.

Lieberman, M. D., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2006). A pain by any other name (rejection, exclusion, ostracism) still hurts the same: The role of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in social and physical pain. In J. T. Cacioppo, P. S., Visser, C. L. Pickett (Eds.), Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people (pp. 167-187). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

23.

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation Is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.

24.

Pickett, C. L., Gardner, W. L., & Knowles, M. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095-1107.

25.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

26.

Schroeder, D. A., Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., & Piliavin, J. A. (1995). Psychology of helping and altruism: Problems and puzzles. New York: McGraw-Hill.

27.

Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can't join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058-1069.

28.

Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 606-615.

29.

Twenge, J. M., Catanese, K. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion,  and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 409-423.

30.

Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 213-220.

31.

Wheeler, S., & Petty, R. (2001). The effect of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797-826.

32.

Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The power of silence. New York: Guilford Press.

33.

Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyber-Ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.

34.

Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to social loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693-706.

35.

Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 363-370.

36.

Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social  Psychology, 40, 560-567.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy