바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Validation of Brief Outcome Questionnaire(BOQ) in Alcohol Dependents

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2007, v.12 no.4, pp.745-759
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2007.12.4.005



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

This study was designed to contribute to the validation of scores on the Brief Outcome Questionnaire(BOQ) which has been bound to be useful for examining the effectiveness of psychotherapy over time. Participants in the current study were 224 alcohol dependent patients. As has been intimated in past research, it was found that the one- and three-factor models conventionally associated with scores on the OQ45(Outcome Questionnaire 45) did not fit the data. This led to a rather rigorous shortening of the scale resulting in the ultimate deletion of 25 of the 45 items. Four related dimensions appeared to explain responses to the remaining 20 items. This Brief Outcome Questionnaire(BOQ) displayed a high reliability and good convergent validity.

keywords
치료효과검사, 심리치료, 알코올의존자, 신뢰도, 타당도, OQ45, BOQ, psychotherapy, alcohol dependents, reliability, validity

Reference

1.

김광일, 김재환, 원호택 (1984). 간이정신진단검사. 서울: 중앙적성출판부.

2.

이명신 (1998). 근로자의 주관적 삶의 질과 그 영향 요인. 연세대학교 박사학위논문.

3.

Andrews, G. (1995). Best practices in implementing outcome management: More science, more art, world-wide. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, 4(3), 19-24.

4.

Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothe, W. (2000). Amos 4.0 User's Guide. SmallWaters Corporation.

5.

Beck, A .T., Emery, G., & Greebberg, R. L. (1985). Anxious disorders and Phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Book, Inc., Publishers.

6.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.

7.

Beretvas, S. N., & Kearney, L. K. (2003). A shortened form of the Outcome Questionnaire: A validation of scores across ethnic groups.Published on-line by The Counseling & mental Health Center The University of Texas. http://utexas.edu/ student/cmhc/research/rescon.html.

8.

Brown, J., Dreis, S., & Nace, D. (1999). What really makes a difference in psychotherapy outcome? Why does managed care want to know? In M. Hubble, B. Duncan, & S. Miller (Ed.), The heart and soul of change(pp. 389-406). Washington, DC: APA press.

9.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117-124.

11.

Derogatis, R. L. (1977). Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual I. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research Unit. Johns Hopkins University.

12.

Derogatis, R. L. (1983). SCL-90: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual for the revised version. Baltimore: Clinical Psychometric Research

13.

Duncan, B., & Miller, S. (2000). The heroic client: Doing client directed, outcome informed therapy. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

14.

Erickson-Cornish, J. A., Riva, M. T., Cox-Henderson, M., Kominars, K.D., & McIntosh, S. (2000). Perceived distress in university counseling center clients across a six-year period. Journal of College Student Development, 41(1), 104-109.

15.

Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62-72.

16.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

17.

Hair, J. F., J. R., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis(4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

18.

Hatfield, D. R., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The use of outcome measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice. Profesinal Psychology: Research and Practics, 35(5), 485-491.

19.

Howard, K., Moras, K., Brill, P., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51(10), 1059-1064.

20.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

21.

Humphreys, K. (1996). Clinical psychologists as psychotherapists: History, future, alternatives. American psychologist, 51(3), 190-197.

22.

Kadera, S. W., Lambert, M. J., & Andrew, A. A. (1996). How much therapy is really enough: A session-by-session analysis of the psychotherapy dose-effect relationship. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice and Research, 5, 132-151.

23.

Lambert, M. J. (2001). Psychotherapy outcome and quality improvement: Introduction to the special section on patient-focused research. Journal of Consulting and clinical Psychology, 69, 147-149.

24.

Lambert, M. J., & Bergin, A. E. (1994). The effctiveness of psychotherapy, In A.E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change(pp. 143-189). New York: John Wiley.

25.

Lambert, M. J., Lunnen, K., Umphress, V., Hansen, N., & Burlingame, G. M. (1994). Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire(OQ45.1). Salt Lake City: IHC Center for Behavioral Healthcare Efficacy.

26.

Lambert, M. J., Ogles, B., & Masters, K. (1992). Choosing outcome assessment devices: An organization and conceptual scheme. Journal of Counseling and Development, 70, 527-539.

27.

Lambert, M. J., Okiishi, J., Finch, A. E., & Johnson, L. D. (1998). Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation. Professional Psychology, 29, 63-70.

28.

Lambert, M. J., Whipple, J., Smart, D., Vermeersch, D., Nielsen, S., & Hawkins, E. (2001). The effects of providing therapists with feedback on patient progress during psychotherapy: Are outcomes enhanced? Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 49-68.

29.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn(Ed.) Educational Measurement: 3rd ed., pp.13-104). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan Publishing Company.

30.

Miller, S., Duncan, B., Brown, J., Sorrell, R., & Chalk, M. (2003). The Outcome Rating Scale and the improvement of effectiveness in a telephonic EAP setting. Unpublished manuscript.

31.

Miller, G. A., & Rice, K. G. (1993). A factor analysis of a university counseling center problem checklist. Journal College Student Development, 34(2), 98-102.

32.

Mueller, R. M., Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1998). Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 248-262.

33.

Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Fields, S. A. (2002). Essentials of outcome assessment. New York: Wiley.

34.

Phelps, R., Eisman, E. J., & Kohout, J. (1998). Psychological practice and managed care: Results of the CAPP practitioner survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 31-36.

35.

Sanderson, W., Riley, W., & Eshun, S. (1997). Report of the working group on clinical services. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 4(1), 3-12.

36.

Sharkin, B. S. (1997). Increased severity of presenting problems in college counseling centers: A closer look. Journal of Counseling & Development, 75(4), 275-281.

37.

SPSS. (2000). SPSS base 10.0 users’ guide. Chicago: Author.

38.

Surtees, P. G., Pharoah, P. D., & Wainwright, N. W. (1998). A follow-up study of new users of a university counseling service. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 26(2), 255-272.

39.

Tyron, G. S. (1999). Counseling dropout relative to client attractiveness, disturbance, and expected number of sessions. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 12(3), 285-291.

40.

Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M. J., Smart, D. W., & Barlow, S. H. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the coutcome questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40-55.

41.

Vermeesch, D. A., Lambert, J. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (2000). Outcome Questionnaire: Item sensitivity to change. Journal of Personality Assessment, 74(2), 242-261.

42.

Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 59-68.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology