바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Gambling Addiction Vulnerability and Deficiency on Inhibition Ability

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2010, v.15 no.4, pp.817-840
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2010.15.4.015


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Researches prospecting gambling issues from neurocognitive perspective are keep increasing and developing as years pass by. This study tried to investigate the relationship between gambling addiction vulnerability and deficiency on executive functions. The study focused on inhibition function among executive functions, I tried to look at it by dividing them by behavioral,cognitive, and emotional by regarding inhibition as a multi-dimensional mechanism. For this purpose, I conducted the Korean-version Gambling Attitude and Beliefs Scale(K-GABS, Breen & Zuckerman, 1999, 2005) by selecting 762 undergraduates as objective, and classified the top 7% as gambling-vulnerable group(N=31) and the bottom 7% as control group(N=28). The participants completed K-NODS(the Korean-version NORC DSM-IV Screen for Gambling Problems) and gambling experience questionnaire, and then participated experiment after taking working memory test. All of them did assignments for evaluating inhibition function of inhibition of motor responses, cognitive inhibition, and emotional inhibition in experimental study. Difference of group were found among inhibition function tasks as result of experimental study. First, among Stop-Signal Task for evaluating behavioral inhibition(inhibition of motor responses) the group that was vulnerable to gambling had faster reaction time for stimulation by poor inhibition compare to control group, and stop-signal delay time was shorter as well. And among Stroop Negative Priming Task for evaluating cognitive inhibition, gamblingvulnerable group slowed their reaction time by failing inhibiting of distractor stimulation. Also among Emotional Go/No-Go Task for evaluating inhibition of emotional responses, gamblingvulnerable group reacted more precisely for happy facial stimulation compare to control group,and they made more error on false alarm by failing for inhibiting on happy facial stimulation. In synthesis, gambling-vulnerable group showed defection for inhibiting prepotent motor responses and had difficulty for inhibiting distractor stimulation by poor inhibition in terms of cognitive process. They also showed tendency of failing inhibiting their reaction for positive emotional stimulation and try to act urgent. These results suggest that gambling-vulnerable group has comprehensive defection in terms of inhibition function.

keywords
Gambling Addiction Vulnerability, Executive Function, Inhibition, 도박 중독 취약성, 집행기능, 억제

Reference

1.

김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 K-NODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3). 487-509.

2.

김교헌 (2006a). 도박행동의 자기조절모형: 상식모형의 확장. 한국심리학회지: 건강. 11(2), 243-274.

3.

김교헌 (2006b). 중독과 자기조절: 인지신경과학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(1), 63-105.

4.

김영훈 (2005). 병적 도박자의 단도박에 영향을 미치는 심리적 요인. 가톨릭대학교 박사학위논문.

5.

노아영 (2007). 반응 억제에 부정적 정서적 자극이 미치는 영향: 사건관련전위 연구. 성신여자대학교 석사학위논문.

6.

박재옥, 이인혜 (2006). 비임상 집단에서 충동성과 불안이 도박 행동에 미치는 효과: Corr의 결합하위 체계 가설을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(4), 607-626.

7.

오윤아 (2006). 기능적 역기능적 충동성의 신경 심리 프로파일. 성신여자대학교 석사학위논문.

8.

이인혜 (2004). 카지노게임 선호유형, 성별, 도박심각성과 심리적 특성 간의 관계: 비합리적 도박신념과 충동성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강,9(2), 351-378.

9.

이인혜 (2005). 한국판 도박 태도 및 신념 척도(GABS)의 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4), 531-546.

10.

이인혜 (2008). 도박중독의 심리. 서진의학연구소 춘계 심포지엄, 63-82.

11.

전혜연 (2007). 인터넷 중독자의 전두엽 실행기능의 특징. 중앙대학교 석사학위논문.

12.

사행산업통합감독위원회 (2009). 2008년 사행산업 현황.

13.

황현국 (2005). 도박심각도와 성격 및 각성수준과의 관계: 기저선과 승ㆍ패의 도박조건을 중심으로. 강원대학교 석사학위논문.

14.

Ciarrocchi, J. W. (2007). 도박중독 심리치료. 서울: 시그마프레스.

15.

Stirling, J. (2003). 신경심리학 입문. 서울: 시그마프레스.

16.

Aron, A. R. (2007). The neural basis of inihibition in cognitive control. Neurosientist, 13(3), 1-15.

17.

Blanco, C., Moreyra, P., Nunes, E.V., Saiz-Ruiz, J. & Ibanez, A. (2001). Pathological gambling: addiction or compulsion?. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 6, 167-176.

18.

Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487-499.

19.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1994). The gambling beliefs and attitudes survey. Unpublished instrument: University of Delaware.

20.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). 'Chasing' in gambling behavior: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097-1111.

21.

Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., Arcangela D'Annucci, & Bellodi, L. (2001). Frontal Lobe Dysfunction in Pathological Gambling Patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 334-341.

22.

Chung, C., Oh, K., Lee, Y. & Byun, H. (1998). Development of a 'Gamsung' measurement system and a database for facial expressions and gestures. Technical Report on a 'Gamsung' Engineering Project of MOST (G-17-01-09), KOREA.

23.

Cyders, M. A. & Smith, G. T. (2007). Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 839-850.

24.

Cyders, M. A. & Smith, G. T. (2008). Clarifying the role of personality dispositions in risk for increased gambling behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 503-508.

25.

Dillon, D. G. & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2007). Inhibition of action, thought, and emotion: A selective neurobiological review. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 12, 99-114.

26.

Friedman, N. P. and Miyake, A. (2004). The Relations Among Inhibition and Interference Control Functions: A Latent-Variable Analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133(1), 101-135.

27.

Fuentes, D., Tavares, H., Artes, R., & Gorenstein, C. (2006). Self-reported and neuropsychological measures of impulsivity in pathological gambling. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(6), 907-912.

28.

Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Edwin de Beurs, & Wim van den Brink (2004). Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 123-141.

29.

Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Edwin de Beurs, & Wim van den Brink (2005). Decision making in pathological gambling: A comparison between pathological gamblers, alcohol dependents, persons with Tourette syndrome, and normal controls. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 137-151.

30.

Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Edwin de Beurs & Wim van den Brink (2006). Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction, 101, 534-547.

31.

Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Factors in problem adolescent fruit machine gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 31-45.

32.

Ibanez, A. G., Mercade, P. V., Sanroma, M. N. A., & Cordero, C. P. (1992). Clinical and behavioral evaluation of pathological gambling in Barcelona, Spain. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(3), 299-310.

33.

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.

34.

Kertman, S., Lowengrub, K., Aizer, A., Zeev Ben Nahum, Kotler, M., & Dannon, P. N. (2006). Stroop performance in pathological gamblers. Psychiatry Research, 142, 1-10.

35.

Kertzman, S., Lowengrub, K., Aizer, A., Vainder, M., Kotler, M., & Dannon, P. N. (2008). Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers. Psychiarty Research, 161, 1-10.

36.

Logan, G. D., Schachar, R. J., & Tannock, R. (1997). Impulsivity and inhibitory control. American Psychological Society, 8(1), 60-64.

37.

Marazziti, D., Mario Catena Dell'Osso, Conversano, C., Consoli, G., Vivarelli, L., Mungai, F., Elena Di Nasso & Golia, F. (2008). Executive function abnormalities in pathological gamblers. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 4:7, 1-6.

38.

Moeller, F. G., Dougherty, D. M., Barratt, E. S., Schmitz, J. M., Swann, A. C., & Grabowski, J. (2001). The impact of impulsivity on cocaine use and retention in treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 21, 193-198.

39.

National Opinion Research Center (1999). Gambling impact and behavior study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission, U.S.A.

40.

Ramautar, J. R., Slagter, H. A., Kok, A., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2006). Probability effects in the stop-signal paradigm: The insula and the significance of failed inhibition. Brain Research, 1105, 143-154.

41.

Roca, M., Torralva, T., Lopez, P., Cetkovich, M., Clark, L., & Manes, F. (2008). Executive Functions in Pathologic Gamblers Selected in an Ecologic Setting. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 21(1), 1-4.

42.

Rugle, L., Melamed L. (1993). Neuropsychological assessment of attention problems in pathological gamblers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 107-112.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology