바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.17 No.1
Citation Share

Development of the Forgiveness Process Scale

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2012, v.17 no.1, pp.123-142
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.1.007



& (2012). Development of the Forgiveness Process Scale. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 17(1), 123-142, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.1.007
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study was conducted to develop and validate the Forgiveness Process Scale, which is based on the process of forgiveness experienced by people who were hurt in interpersonal relationships. There was an attempt to find differences in psychological coping methods in each phase of the Forgiveness Process. For this purpose, three interrelated studies have been performed. Study 1 was conducted to develop the Forgiveness Process Scale based on the Process of Forgiveness Model by Lee, Kyoung-Soon. From exploratory factor analysis, six factors have been derived: ‘Hatred,’ ‘Struggle,’ ‘Stabilization,’ ‘Redefinition,’ ‘Forgiveness’ and ‘Maturing.’ Five items for each of these factors, thirty in total, have been formulated. In Study 2, confirmatory factor analysis showed a reasonable fit index for 6 factors of the Forgiveness Process Scale. Convergent validity with the Rye Forgiveness Scale (FS) and the Korean Forgiveness Scale (KFS) was verified showing a significant correlation coefficient. The Forgiveness Process Scale reliably differentiated upper forgiveness level group from lower forgiveness level group. As a result of concurrent criterion-related validity analysis, sub-factors of the Forgiveness Process Scale were significantly correlated to anger, anxiety, and depression. Limitations of this study and suggestions for further research and practice are discussed.

keywords
용서, 용서과정, 척도개발, 타당화, forgiveness, forgiveness process, development of scales

Reference

1.

권석만 (2006). 젊은이를 위한 인간관계의 심리학. 서울:학지사.

2.

김지영, 권석만 (2009). 용서특질척도의 개발 및 타당화.한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 239-261.

3.

박종효 (2003). 용서와 건강의 관련성 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 301-321.

4.

박종효 (2006). Enright 용서심리검사(EFI-K)의 타당화연구. 교육심리연구, 20(1), 265-282.

5.

성태제 (2007). SPSS/AMOS를 이용한 알기 쉬운 통계분석. 서울: 학지사.

6.

손운산 (2008). 용서와 치료. 서울: 이화여자대학교출판부.

7.

`신재은, 현명호 (2010). 종교성향, 종교적 대처와 상황적 용서의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15, 699-710.

8.

오영희 (2006). 한국인의 상처와 용서에 대한 조사. 교육심리연구, 20(2), 467-486.

9.

오영희 (2008). 한국인 용서 척도 개발을 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(4), 1045-1063.

10.

이경순 (2008). 용서과정에 대한 질적 연구: 근거이론을중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(1),237-252.

11.

이아롱, 구재선 (2009). 용서와 성격 특성의 관계: 누가용서를 하는가? 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격,23, 89-105.

12.

이주일 (1988). 이분척도와 Likert형 7점 척도의 신뢰도,타당도, 반응양식의 비교: 자기검색 척도와 자기의식 척도를 대상으로. 서울대학교 석사학위논문.

13.

전겸구, 최상진, 양병창 (2001). 통합적 한국판 CES-D개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 6(1), 59-76

14.

전겸구, 한덕웅, 이장호, Spielberger (1997). 한국판 STAXI 척도 개발: 분노와 혈압. 한국심리학회 지: 건강, 2(1), 60-78.

15.

정성진, 서경현 (2011). 대학생의 특성용서, 상태용서,용서 결정요인의 관계. 청소년학연구, 18(6),147-169.

16.

한덕웅, 이장호, 전겸구 (1996). Spielberger의 상태-특성 불안검사 Y형의 개발. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 1(1), 1-14.

17.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1),167-177.

18.

Baskin, T. W., & Enright, R. D. (2004). Intervention studies on forgiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 79-90.

19.

Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2006). Helping clients forgive: An empirical guide for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

20.

Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group. (1996). Counseling within the forgiveness triad: On forgiving, receiving forgiveness, and self-forgiveness. Counseling and Values, 40, 107-126.

21.

Knutson, J., Enright, R. D., & Garbers, B. (2008). Validating the developmental pathway of forgiveness. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86, 193-199.

22.

McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I., & Thoresen, C. E. (2000). The psychology of forgiveness: History, conceptual issues, and overview. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1-16). New York: Guilford Press.

23.

McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.

24.

Rye, M. S., Loiacono, D. M., Folck, C. D., Olszewski, B. T., Heim, T. A., & Madia, B. P. (2001). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of two forgiveness scales. Current Psychology: Developmental·Learning· Personality·Social, 20, 260-277.

25.

Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., Freedman, S., Olson, L. M., & Sarinopoulos, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641-655.

26.

Trainer, M. F. (1981). Forgiveness: Intrinsic, role-expected, expedient, in the context of divorce. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.

27.

Truong, K. T. (1991). Human forgiveness: A phenomenological study about the process of forgiving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, United States International University.

28.

Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary.

29.

Walker, D. F., & Gorsuch, R. L. (2004). Dimensions underlying sixteen models of forgiveness and reconciliation. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 32, 12-25.

30.

Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2005). More questions about forgiveness: Research agenda for 2005-2015. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness. (pp. 557-573). New York: Routledge.

31.

Worthington, E. L., Jr. (2006). 용서와 화해 [Forgiving and reconciling: Bridges to wholeness and hope]. (윤종석 역). 서울: IVP. (원전은 2003 에 출판)

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy