바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.18 No.3
Citation Share

Differences in Implicit Attitudes Toward Gambling Depending on The Problem of Gambling

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2013, v.18 no.3, pp.557-566
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2013.18.3.008


& (2013). Differences in Implicit Attitudes Toward Gambling Depending on The Problem of Gambling. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 18(3), 557-566, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2013.18.3.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Having a positive attitude towards gambling is an important factor that determines whether gambling addiction continues to relapses. A person’s attitude toward gambling can be explicitly evaluated using self-report scales. However, explicit attitudes can be automatically manipulated in conscious awareness. Implicit attitudes, on the other hand, are automatically activated and can influence behavior outside the boundaries of consciousness. Thus, the aim of study was to investigate the differences between implicit and explicit attitudes toward gambling in accordance to the severity of gambling using the Gambling-Implicit Association Test (G-IAT) and self-report scales. Participants consisted of 42 male undergraduates from 332 undergraduates who have experienced gambling at least once. They were divided into two groups: a high severity gambling group (N=23) and a low severity gambling group (N=19). Their explicit attitudes towards gambling was assessed using the Gambling Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. The participants' implicit attitudes toward gambling were evaluated using the G-IAT. According to the results of implicit attitudes, the high severity gambling group had more positive attitudes toward gambling than the low severity gambling group. However, there were no differences in the explicit attitudes toward gambling between the groups. These results indicated that individuals with high severity of gambling show differences in implicit and explicit attitudes. Therefore, it may be necessary to assess implicit and automatic attitudes independently of social desirability when evaluating the severity of gambling.

keywords
도박중독, 도박 암묵적 연합검사, 도박 관련 태도, 암묵적 태도, gambling addiction, Gambling-Implicit Association Test, attitudes of gambling, implicit attitude

Reference

1.

김교헌 (2006). 도박행동의 자기조절모형: 상식모형의확장. 한국심리학회: 건강, 11(2), 243-274.

2.

김민경 (2005). 병적 도박의 위험요인 탐색: 성격과 동기를 중심으로. 중앙대학교 박사학위청구논문.

3.

이순묵, 김종남, 최삼욱, 현명호, 김수진 (2009). 도박의정의와 범주화에 대한 개념의 명확화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 1-27.

4.

이인혜 (2005). 한국판 도박 태도 및 신념 척도(GABS)의 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4), 531-546.

5.

이흥표 (2003). 비합리적 도박신념이 병적 도박에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(2), 415-434.

6.

전영민 (2009). 한국 도박중독 유병률 추정의 쟁점과 대책: 무엇을 어떤 도구로 어떻게 조사하나? 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(3), 481-495.

7.

최완철, 김경빈, 오동열, 이태경 (2001). 한국형 사우스-오크 병적 도박 검사 표준화에 대한 예비연구.중독정신의학, 5, 46-52.

8.

Anderson, G., & Brown, R. I. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 401-410.

9.

Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487-499.

10.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). 'Chasing' in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1097-1111.

11.

Brevers, D., Cleeremans A., Hermant, C., Tibboel, H., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., & Noël, X. (2013). Implicit gambling attitudes in problem gamblers: Positive but not negative implicit associations. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44, 94-97.

12.

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.

13.

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.

14.

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.

15.

Jung, K. H., & Lee, J. (2009). Implicit and explicit attitude dissociation in spontaneous deceptive behavior. Acta Psychologica, 132, 62-67.

16.

Kuentzel, J. G., Henderon, M. J., & Melville, C. L. (2008). The impact of social desirability biases on self-report among college student and problem gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 307-319.

17.

Ladouceur, R., & Walker, R. (1996). A cognitive perspective on gambling. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Trends in cognitive and behavioral therapies (pp. 89-120). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

18.

Maria, C., & Reiko, G. (2008). Implicit and explicit attitudes to high and low calorie food in females with different BMI status. Journal of Eating Behaviors, 9, 303-312.

19.

Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265-292). London: Psychology Press.

20.

Nunes, K. L., Firestone, P., & Baldwin, M. W. (2007). Indirect assessment of cognition of child sexual abusers with the Implicit Association Test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 454-475.

21.

Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. S. (2002). Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clinical Psychological Review, 22, 1009-1061.

22.

Sunghwan, Y., & Kanetkar, V. (2010). Implicit measures of attitudes toward gambling: An exploratory study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 24, 140- 163.

23.

Wilkes, B. L., Gonsalvez, C. J., & Blaszczynski, A. (2010). Capturing SCL and HR changes to win and loss events during gambling on electronic machines. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 265-272.

24.

Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy