바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Cognitive processes of the Social Anxiety group after Social Performance Anxiety: degree of Post-event processing

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2015, v.20 no.1, pp.329-346
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.1.018


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in cognitive processing according to social anxiety level, during and after the experience of the social situation. We focused on post-event processing as the expected cognitive processes after the social anxiety experience. For this study, 18 students each from the high and low social anxiety group were asked to make an impromptu 3-minutes speech in front of 4 experiment confederates while being videotaped. The 4 experiment confederates also evaluated the speech of participants during the experiment. Two days later, participants were asked to participate in a follow-up study. The result of the study showed that the group with high social anxiety overall had formed a negative impression about speech, as compared to the group with low social anxiety. However, when the participants were presented more specific evaluation items, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Secondly, the group with high social anxiety were more immersed in the post-event processing, as compared to the group with low social anxiety. Third, the hypothesized recognition bias was found in the follow-up evaluation study, and the recognition bias for negative items was more noticeable than those for positive items. Finally, the several implications and limitations of the study were discussed.

keywords
social anxiety, post-event processing, rumination, recognition biass, 사회불안, 사후사건처리, 반추, 재인편향

Reference

1.

권현정 (2014). 해석 편향 수정이 사회불안 경향성을 지닌 대학생의 자기 평가와 사후반추사고에 미치는영향. 아주대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

2.

김영주 (2009). 사회불안의 사후반추 질문지 개발 및 타당화 연구. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

3.

김진영 (2000). 우울한 기분에 대한 두 가지 내부 초점적 반응양식: 반추적 반응양식 대 반성적 반응양식. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

4.

김향숙 (2001). 사회공포증 하위 유형의 기억편향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

5.

염태호, 박영숙, 오경자, 김정규, 이영호 (1992). K-WAIS 실시요강. 한국가이던스.

6.

오지희, 현명호 (2012). 사회공포증 경향성자의 자기초점적 주의가 기억편향에 미치는 영향. 청소년학연구: 19(1), 161-180.

7.

이선화 (2009). 사후 처리 과정 조작이 예기불안에 미치는 영향 : 반성, 반추, 주의분산의 효과. 아주대학교대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

8.

임선영, 최혜라, 권석만 (2007). 사후반추사고가 사회적자기 효능감 및 예기불안에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 26(1), 39-56.

9.

전운, 박기환 (2013). 사회불안이 높은 대학생들의 불안과 사후반추사고에 자기심상조작이 미치는 영향. 인지행동치료, 13(1), 87-105.

10.

조용래, 원호택 (1997). 대인불안에 대한 인지적 평가:사회적 상호작용에 대한 자기 효능감 척도의 개발과 타당화에 관한 연구. 심리학의 연구문제: 26(2), 323-344.

11.

Abbott, M. J., & Rapee, R. M. (2004). Post-event rumination and negative self-appraisal in social Phobia before and after treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 136–144.

12.

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Ed). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

13.

Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greebberg, R. L. (1985). Anxious disorders and phobias : A Cognitive perspective. New York : Basic Book, Inc., Publishers.

14.

Becker, E. S., Roth, W. T., Andrich, M., & Margraf, J. (1999). Explicit memory in anxiety disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 153–163.

15.

Chen, J., Rapee. R. M., & Abbott M. J. (2013). Mediatiors of the relationship between social anxiety and post-event rumination. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 27(1), 1-8.

16.

Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneider (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment, New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Cody, M.. W., & Teachman, B. A. (2010). Post-event processing and memory bias for performance feedback in social anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 468-479.

18.

Coles, M. E., & Heimberg, R. G. (2002). Memory biases in the anxiety disorders: Current status. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 587-627.

19.

Dannahy, L., & Stopa, L. (2007). Post-event processing in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1207-1219.

20.

Edwards, S. L., Rapee, R. M., & Franklin, J. (2003).Post-event rumination and recall bias for a social performance event in high and low socially anxious individuals. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 603–617.

21.

Fehm, L., Schneider, G., & Hoyer, J. (2007). Is Post-event processing specific for social anxiety? Journal of Behavior herapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 11-22.

22.

Garner M., Mogg K., & Bradley B. P. (2006). Orienting and maintenance of gaze to facial expression in social anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 115, 760–770.

23.

Gaydukevych, D., & Kocovski, N. L. (2012). Effect of self-focused attention on post-event processing in social anxiety. Behavior Research and Therapy, 50, 47-55.

24.

Gramer, M., Schild E., & Lurz, E. (2012). Objective and perceived physiological arousal in trait social anxiety and post-event processing of a prepared speaking task. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 980~984.

25.

Heinrichs, N., & Hofmann, S. G. (2001). Information processing in social phobia: A critical review and preliminary model. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(5), 751-770.

26.

Kocovski, N. L., & Rector, N. A. (2008). Post-event processing in social anxiety disorder:Idiosyncratic priming in the course of CBT. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 23-36.

27.

Leary, M. R. (2007). Motivational and Emotional Aspects of the self. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 317-44.

28.

Lundh, L. G., & Ost, L. G. (1996b). Recognition bias for critical faces in social phobics. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(10), 787-794.

29.

Lundh, L. G., & Sperling, M. (2002). Social anxiety and Post-event processing of socially distressing events. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 31, 129-134.

30.

Mansell, W., & Clark, D, M. (1999). W. Mansell and D.M. Clark , How do I appear to others? Social anxiety and processing of the social self. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 419–434.

31.

Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1989). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fears and social interaction anxiety, Unpublished manuscript.

32.

McEvoy, P., Mahoney, A., & Moulds, M. L. (2010). Development of the repetitive thinking questionnaire: Are worry, rumination, and post-event processing one and the same? Journal of Anxiety Disorders (in press).

33.

Mellings, T, B., & Alden, L. E. (2000). Cognitive processes in social anxiety: the effects of self-focus, rumination and anticipatory processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 243-257.

34.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-582.

35.

Norton, P. J., & Hope, D. A. (2001). Kernels of truth or distorted perceptions: Self and observer ratings of social anxiety and performance, Behavior Therapy, 32(4), 765-786.

36.

Paul, G. L. (1969). Physiological effects of relaxation training and hypnotic suggestion. Journal of abnormal Psychology, 74(4), 425-437.Psychology, 74(4), 425-437.

37.

Rachman, S., Grǖter-Andrew, J., & Shafran, R. (2000). Post-event processing in social anxiety, Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 611-617.

38.

Rapee, R. M. (1995). Descriptive psychopathology of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment(pp.41-66). New York: The Guilford Press.

39.

Rector, N. A., Antony, M. M., Laposa, J. M., Kocovski, N. L., & Swindon, R. P. (2008). Assessing content domains of repetitive thought in the Anxiety spectrum: Rumination and worry in nonclinical and clinically anxious samples, International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 1(4), 352-376.

40.

Schmitz, J., Kramer, M., & Tuschen-Caffier, B. (2011). Negative post-event processing and decreased self-appraisals of performance following social stress in childhood social anxiety:An experimental study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 789-795.

41.

Zou, J. B,., & Abott, M. J. (2012). Self-perception and rumination in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(4), 250-257.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology