바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

논문 상세

다음
논문 투고

Vol.20 No.2

Citation Share

수용 전념 치료 (ACT)에서 관계 틀 관점으로 은유를 이해하고, 활용하고, 창조하기

Understanding, Using, and Creating Metaphors with Relational Frame Perspectives in Acceptance–Commitment Therapy

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2015, v.20 no.2, pp.371-389
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.2.001
손정락 (전북대학교)
손정락. (2015). 수용 전념 치료 (ACT)에서 관계 틀 관점으로 은유를 이해하고, 활용하고, 창조하기. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 20(2), 371-389, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2015.20.2.001

초록

수용 전념 치료 (ACT) 의 철학적 핵심은 모든 인간은 고통을 받는다는 것이다. ACT는 이론적으로 행동주의 원리와 행동주의 언어 이론인 관계 틀 이론에 근거하고 있다. ACT 모형은 언어 과정이 심리적 경직성의 핵심에 놓여 있으며, 그러므로 인간 고통의 근원이라고 가정한다. ACT는언어가 밝은 면과 어두운 면을 동시에 갖고 있는 양날의 검으로 본다. ACT의 목표는 피할 수 없는 고통을 수용함으로써 풍요롭고 의미있는 삶을 창조하는 것이다. 그래서 ACT의 목적은 현재순간에 접촉하며 깨어있으며 또한 가치를 두는 방향으로 나아가는 능력을 향상시키기 위해 그러한 언어 과정을 약화시키는 것이다. ACT의 여섯 가지 핵심 치료 과정은 수용, 탈융합, 현재 순간의 자각, 맥락으로서의 자기, 가치 그리고 전념 행동이다. 심리치료에서 은유의 활용은 임상 문헌에서 주목을 받아왔다. 은유와 체험 연습은 ACT에서 중요한 역할을 하는데, 가치를 두는 행동의결과에 대한 맥락을 창조함으로써 언어의 역효과를 약화시켜준다. RFT, 기능적 맥락주의 및 여섯가지 핵심치료 과정을 바탕으로, 치료자와 내담자들은 은유를 더 잘 이해하고, 활용하고, 창조할수 있다. 하이쿠는 은유와 함께 새로운 치료 방안이 될 수도 있을 것이다.

keywords
acceptance commitment therapy(ACT), relational frame theory, metaphors, functional contextualism, psychological flexibility, 은유, 수용 전념 치료 (ACT), 관계 틀 이론, 기능적 맥락주의, 심리적 유연성

Abstract

The philosophical core of Acceptance‐Commitment Therapy (ACT) is that all humans experience suffering. ACT is theoretically based on basic behavioral principles and the Relational Frame Theory (RFT) that is a behavioral theory of language. The ACT model postulates that language processes are at the core of psychological and behavioral inflexibility, and therefore at the root of human suffering. ACT regards language as a double‐edged sword which has a dark side and a light side. The aim of ACT is to create a rich and meaningful life while accepting the pain that inevitably goes with it. So the goal of ACT is to undermine language processes in ways that improve people's ability to contact the present moment more fully and with awareness, and that allow them to move valued directions. Six core therapeutic processes of ACT are acceptance, defusion, present‐moment awareness, self ‐as‐context, values, and commitment action. The use of metaphors in psychotherapy has received considerable attention in the clinical literature. Metaphors and experiential exercises also play a central role in ACT, helping undermine the adverse effects of language by creating contexts with the consequence of valued action. With RFT, functional contextualism, and the six core therapeutic processes in ACT, therapists and clients can understand, use, and create metaphors. Haiku may be a new therepeautic device combined with metaphors.

keywords
acceptance commitment therapy(ACT), relational frame theory, metaphors, functional contextualism, psychological flexibility, 은유, 수용 전념 치료 (ACT), 관계 틀 이론, 기능적 맥락주의, 심리적 유연성

참고문헌

1.

김준영 (2006). 입에 익은 우리말. 학고재.

2.

류시화 (2014). 백만 광년의 고독 속에서 한 줄의 시를읽다; 류시화 하이쿠 읽기. 연금술사.

3.

손정락 (2014). 코칭에서의 마음챙김과 수용-전념 기반접근법. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 19(2). 453-467.

4.

손정락 (2015). 정신병리학 수강 대학원생들의 감정이입(empathy) 함양을 위한 하이쿠. 미 발표논문.

5.

유병화 (2007). Pepper의 맥락주의 관점에서 본 은유론. 새한영문학, 49 (3), 101-122.

6.

정성미 (2007)). 은유의 치료적 활용. 어문론집, 42, 121-136.

7.

Alvis, K. M. (2010). Brief acceptance and commitment therapy: Are the metaphors necessary? Thesis of Master of Science at Southern Illinois University Carbondale.

8.

Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McHugh, L. (2004). Relational frame theory: some implications for understanding and treating human psychopathology. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Theory, 4(2), 161-181.

9.

Blackledge, J. T., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Emotion regulation in acceptance and commitment therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 243-255.

10.

Blenkiron, P. (2005). Stories and analogies in cognitive behaviour therapy: A clinical review. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 33, 45-59.

11.

Chaskalson, M. (2013). 직장에서의 마음챙김: MBSR로회복 탄력적인 개인과 공명하는 조직만들기〔The mindful workplace: Developing resilience individuals and resonant organizations with MBSR〕. (손정락 역). 서울:교보문고. (원전은 2011에 출판).

12.

Ciarrochi, J. Bilich, L., & Godsel, C. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a mechanism of change in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. In Ruth Baer’'s (Ed), Assessing mindfulness and acceptance: Illuminating the processes of change.(pp.51-76). New Harbinger : Oakland, CA.

13.

Ciarrochi, J., & Blackledge, J. T. (2006). Mindfulness-Based Emotional intelligence Training: A new approach to reducing human suffering and promoting effectiveness. In J. Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas, & J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional Intelligence in everyday life (2nd ed., pp. 206-228). New York: Psycholgy Press.

14.

Gair, S. (2012). Haiku as a creative writing approach to explore empathy with social work students: A classroom-based inquiry. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 25(2). 69-82.

15.

Harmon, T., Nelson, R. O., & Hayes, S. C. (1980). Self-monitoring of mood versus activity by depressed clients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48(1), 30-38.

16.

Harris, R. (2009). ACT made simple: An easy-to-road primer on acceptance and commitment therapy. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

17.

Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behavior Therapy, 35, 639-665.

18.

Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

19.

Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2001). Acceptance and commitment therapy: Model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(1), 1-25.

20.

Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (2014). 수용전념치료:실무 지침서 〔A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy.(ed).〕(손정락, 이금단 역). 서울: 학지사. (원전은 2004에 출판)

21.

Hayes, S, C., Strosahl, K., Bunting, K., Twohig, M., & Wilson, K. G. (2005). What is Acceptance and Commitment Therapy? In S. C. Hayes & K. D. Strosahl (Eds.), A practical guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (pp. 3-29). New York:Springer Science.

22.

Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.

23.

Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1993). Some applied implications of contemporary behavior analytic account of verbal events. The Behavior Analyst, 16(2), 283-301.

24.

Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. W., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152-1168.

25.

Kendall, W. A. (2010). Examining the persuasive effect of metaphor use in psychotherapy: An experimental test of contributing factors. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.

26.

Kopp, R. R. (1995). Metaphor therapy: Using client-generated metaphors in psychotherapy. Brunner/ Mazel, A member of Taylor & Francis Group.

27.

Ligocki, M. K. (2010). The constructs of empathy, mindfulness, self-compassion, and selfrumination:An exploratory factor analysis. Doctora dessertation, University of Houston.

28.

Mays, M. (1990). The use of metaphor in hypnotherapy and psychotherapy. Individual Psychology: The Journal of Adlerian Theory, Research, & Practice, 46(4), 423-430.

29.

Masuda, A., Price, M., Anderson, P., Schmertz, S., & Calamaras, M. (2004). The role of psychological flexibility in mental health stigma and psychological distress for the stigmatizer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychlolgy, 28(10), 1244-1262.

30.

McLaren, K. (2013). The art of empathy: A complete guide to life's most essential skill. Boulder, Colorado: Sounds True.

31.

Mojtabai, M. (2000). Dilusion as error: The history of a metaphor. History of Psychiatry, 11, 3-14.

32.

Schnitzer, M. L., & Pedreira, M. A. (2005). A neuropsychologicaol theory of metaphor. Language Science, 27, 31-49.

33.

Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Understanding metaphor: A relational frame perspective. The Behavior Analyst, 24(2), 191-200.

34.

Stoddard, J. A., & Afari, N. (2014). The big book of ACT metaphors: A practitioner's guide to experiential exercises & metaphors in Acceptance & Commitment Therapy. New Harbinger.

35.

Stott, R., Mansell, W., Salkoviskis, P., Lavender, A., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2013) 인지행동 치료에서 메타포(김원,김병수,송후림 역). 학지사. (원전은2010에 출판)

36.

Varra, A. A., Drossel, C., & Hayes, S. C. (2009). The use of metaphor to establish acceptance and mindfulness. In F. Didonna (Ed.), Clinical handbook of mindfulness. Springer.

한국심리학회지: 건강

논문 투고 OA 정책