바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

한국판 성인놀이성 척도(K-APTS) 타당화 연구: 대학생 집단을 중심으로

A Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale(K-APTS)

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2018, v.23 no.2, pp.397-425
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2018.23.2.006
이순행 (이화여자대학교)
이희연 (가천대학교)
정미라 (가천대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구에서는 Shen과 동료들(2014a)에 의해 개발된 성인놀이성 척도(APTS)를 타당화하고 심리측정적 속성을 확인하고자 하였다. 원척도를 타당화하기 위해 대학생 534명을 대상으로 예비연구와 본 연구를 진행하였다. 예비연구를 위해 수도권 지역의 대학생 130명(남자 65명, 여자 65명)의 자료를 토대로 문항양호도 및 탐색적 요인분석을 한 결과, 원척도와 동일하게 19개 문항으로 구성된 5요인 구조가 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 이후 본 연구를 위해 수도권 및 충청 지역의 대학생 404명(남자 202명, 여자 202명)을 대상으로 척도의 구인타당도, 준거타당도, 신뢰도, 성격특성과의 관련성, 그리고 성별에 따른 다집단 CFA를 분석하였다. 첫째, 구인타당도를 위한 확인적 요인분석 결과, 한국판 성인놀이성 척도(K-APTS)는 5요인의 삼차 위계구조가 적합한 것으로 나타났다. 즉, 총 19개의 문항은 ‘재미신념’, ‘주도성’, ‘반응성’, ‘비억제성’, ‘즉흥성’의 5개의 일차요인에 의해 설명되며, 이 중 ‘재미신념’, ‘주도성’, ‘반응성’의 3개 요인은 ‘재미-추구’라는 위계적 이차 요인에 의해 설명되며, ‘재미추구’, ‘비억제성’, ‘즉흥성’은 ‘성인놀이성’이라는 위계적 삼차 요인에 의해 설명되었다. 둘째, K-APTS는 개념적으로 관련된 척도인 K-PSA(Schaefer & Greenberg, 1997)와 유의미한 상관을 보여 준거타당도가 입증되었으며, 내적 일관성 역시 적절한 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, K-APTS는 K-BFI 중 개방성, 외향성, 친화성, 성실성과는 정적인 상관을, 신경증과는 부적인 상관을 보여 성격 특질과의 관련성도 입증되었다. 넷째, 성별에 따른 다집단 CFA를 검증한 결과, K-APTS는 성별에 따른 형태동일성, 측정동일성, 부분절편동일성이 만족되었다. 잠재 평균분석 결과, 여학생은 남학생보다 재미신념과 주도성 요인에서 더 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
성인놀이성 척도, APTS, 놀이성, 타당화, 다집단 CFA, Adult Playfulness, Adult Playfulness Trait Scale, Playfulness, Validation, Multi-group CFA

Abstract

There is a lack of playfulness scales for adult with evidence of validity and reliability in Korea. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale(K-APTS; Shen, Chick, & Zinn, 2014a), a new measurement of playfulness that assesses an individual’s disposition for uninhibitedness and spontaneous fun. A total of 540 college students participated in the survey. Confirmative factor analyses(CFA) and multiple-group CFA in M-plus 7.4, was used for the verification of construct validity, the Pearson correlation coefficients in SPSS 23.0 was used for the verification of criteria validity and Cronbach’s ɑ in SPSS 23.0 was used for the verification of reliability. The three-level construct of K-APTS was confirmed. The 19 items of K-APTS were explained by five clearly interpretable factors: fun belief, initiative, reactivity, fun belief, initiative, and reactivity. High-order factor analyses confirmed the underlying hierarchical model of K-APTS that comprises three additional sub-dimensions: fun-seeking motivation, uninhibitedness, and spontaneity, wherein fun-seeking motivation includes three sub-dimensions: fun belief, initiative, and reactivity. In third order model, one overarching construct supports the interpretation of a general “playfulness” factor underlying all subscales. Evidence of criteria validity was obtained from correlations of the K-APTS with the K-PSA. The three-level construct of K-APTS demonstrated good internal consistency. Greater playfulness in the K-APTS was associated positively with extraversion, openness to new experiences, agreeability, conscientiousness, it was negatively associated with neuroticism in K-BFI. The multi-group CFA was conducted to compare male and female samples. Given the configural invariance, the metric invariance and partial scalar invariance were held across multiple groups. The latent mean analysis examined whether the mean level of latent construct was invariant across groups. Females showed a statistically lower mean than males in the initiative(I) factor in the K-APTS.

keywords
성인놀이성 척도, APTS, 놀이성, 타당화, 다집단 CFA, Adult Playfulness, Adult Playfulness Trait Scale, Playfulness, Validation, Multi-group CFA

참고문헌

1.

김경은 (2014). 예비유아교사의 성격 5요인 및 놀이성과 창의성 간의 관계. 인간발달연구, 21(1), 1-17.

2.

김근희 (2005). 유아의 놀이성과 또래 유능성과의 관계. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 석사학위 청구논문.

3.

김성희 (2009). 성 역할 특성으로서의 주도성, 친화성, 경직된 주도성, 경직된 친화성과 심리적 적응. 서울대학교 석사학위 청구논문.

4.

김수영 (2016). 구조방정식 모형의 기본과 확장: Mplus 예제를 중심으로. 서울: 학지사.

5.

김아영, 차정은, 이채희, 주지은, 임은영 (2016). 혼자 쓰는 연구 논문. 서울: 학지사.

6.

김영희 (2002). 놀이를 잘 하는 아동의 특성에 대한 연구. 놀이치료연구, 6(1), 3-15.

7.

김지현, 김복환, 하문선 (2011). 간편형 한국어 BFI(Big Five Inventory) 타당화연구. 인간이해, 32(1), 47-65.

8.

김지혜, 김광웅 (2004). 유아의 놀이성과 정서능력과의 관계, 놀이치료연구, 9(1), 91-105.

9.

민경환 (2002). 성격심리학. 서울: 법문사.

10.

박아청 (2004). 청년기 자아정체감의 발달단계의 특성분석. 교육심리연구, 18(1), 301-312.

11.

박현숙, 김광웅 (2004). 유아기 자녀를 둔 어머니의 놀이성과 부모효능감 및 양육스트레스에 관한 연구. 한국놀이치료학회지, 7(1), 13-24.

12.

양은실 (1998). 놀이치료사의 놀이성과 경력, 태도, 지식, 기술과의 관계. 놀이치료연구, 1(1), 47-58.

13.

오혜주, 유미숙, 조유진 (2010). 어머니의 놀이성 평가척도 개발을 위한 예비연구: 만 3∼8세 아동 어머니를 대상으로. 인간발달, 17(1), 349-362.

14.

이억범 (2007). 대학생의 배경변인에 따른 자아정체감 내적통제성 진로결정수준 간의 관계 분석. 한영논총, 11, 237-260.

15.

이훈, 조희범, 이영진 (2010). 성인의 놀이성 지표개발. 관광학연구, 34(9), 165-188.

16.

장영숙, 조혜정 (2006). 부모의 양육태도와 유아의 놀이성과의 관계. 유아교육학회집, 10(1), 251-268.

17.

한지현, 이진숙 (2015). 어머니의 5요인 성격특성과 놀이성이 양육행동에 미치는 영향. 아동학회지, 36(5), 173-188.

18.

홍세희 (2000). 구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

19.

황매향, 임효진, 임지숙, 손보영 (2012). 자아정체감 수준에 따른 대학생 집단의 유형과 관련요인 분석. 아시아교육연구, 13(3), 115-142.

20.

Ablon, S. L. (2001). Continuities of tongues: A developmental perspective on the role of play in child and adult psychoanalytic process. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 10(3), 354–365.

21.

Baken, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Boston: Beacon.

22.

Barnett, L. A. (1990). Playfulness: Definition, design, and measurement. Play and Culture, 3(4), 319-336.

23.

Barnett, L. A. (1991). The playful child: Measurement of a disposition to play. Play and Culture, 4(6), 51-74.

24.

Barnett, L. A. (2007). The nature of playfulness in young adults. Personality & Individual Differences, 43(4), 949-958.

25.

Barnett, L. A. (2011). How do playful people play?: Gendered and racial leisure perspectives, motives, and preference of college students. Leisure Science, 33(5), 382-401.

26.

Barnett, L. A., & Kleiber, D. A. (1982). Concomitants of playfulness in early childhood: Cognitive abilities and gender. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 141(1), 115-127.

27.

Barnett, L. A., & Kleiber, D. A. (1984). Playfulness and the early play environment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 144(2), 153-164.

28.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246.

29.

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.

30.

Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(2), 181-197.

31.

Bowman, J. R. (1987). Making work play. In G. A. Fine (Ed.), Meaningful play, playful meanings (pp. 61–71). IL: Human Kinetics.

32.

Boyle, G. J., Stankov, L., & Cattell, R. B. (1995). Measurement and statistical models in the study of personality and intelligence. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 417-446). New York: Plenum.

33.

Bozionelos, N., & Bozionelos, G. (1999). Playfulness: Its relationship with instrumental and expressive traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(4), 749-760.

34.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.

35.

Brown, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Ling (Eds.), Testing structural equating models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

36.

Bundy, A. C. (1997). Play and playfulness: What to look for. In L. D. Parham & L. S. Fazio (Eds.), Play in occupational Therapy for children (pp. 56-62). St. Louis: Mosby.

37.

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., & Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.

38.

Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Beyond traits in the study of personality coherence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 27-32.

39.

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (ENO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

40.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. NY: Harper & Row.

41.

Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., & Fujita, F. (1992). Extraversion and subjective well-being in a U.S. national probability sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 26(3), 205-215.

42.

Erikson, E. H. (1977). Toys and reason. New York: Norton.

43.

Fix, G. A. (2003). The psychometric properties of Playfulness Scales with adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Fairleigh Dickinson, USA.

44.

Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319.

45.

Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1992). The adult playfulness scale: An initial assessment. Psychological Reports, 71(1), 83-103.

46.

Glynn, M. A., & Webster, J. (1993). Refining the nomological net of the Adult Playfulness Scale: Personality, motivational and attitudinal correlates for highly intelligent adults. Psychological Reports, 72(3), 1023-1026.

47.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor Analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

48.

Guitard, P., Ferland, F., & Dutil E. (2005). Toward a better understanding of playfulness in adult. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 25(1), 9-22.

49.

Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanation. Psychological Bullein, 116(3), 412-428.

50.

Hong, S., & Malik, M. L. (2003). Testing configural, metric, scalar and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using a non-western sample. Education and Psychological Measurement, 63(4), 636-654.

51.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

52.

Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

53.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and Theoretical Perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.

54.

Kirkcaldy, B. D. (1990). Gender and personality determinants of recreational interests. Studia Psychologica, 32(1), 115-127.

55.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

56.

Krueger, A. (1995). The Adult Playfulness Scale: A review. Psychology, 32(2), 36-38.

57.

Lauer, J. C., & Lauer, R. H. (2002). The Play Solution: How to Put the Fun and Excitement Back into Your Relationship. Chicago, IL: Contemporary Books.

58.

Lewinsohn, P. M. (1974). A behavioral approach to depression. In R. J. Friedman & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The psychology of depression: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 150-180). New York: Wiley.

59.

Lieberman, J. N. (1965). Playfulness and divergent thinking ability: An investigation of their relationship at the kindergarten level. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 107(2), 219-224.

60.

Lieberman, J. N. (1977). Playfulness: Its relationship to imagination and creativity. New York: Academic Press.

61.

Lodi-Smith, J. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 68-86.

62.

Magnuson, C. D. (2011). The playful advantage: How playfulness enhances coping with stress (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Illinois. Urbana-Champaign.

63.

Martocchio, J. J., & Webster, J. (1992). Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45(3), 553-578.

64.

Maxwell, S., Reed, G., Saker, J., & Story, V. (2005). The two faces of playfulness: A new tool to select potential successful sales reps. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 25(3), 215-229.

65.

Millar, S. (1974). The psychology of play. New York: Aronson.

66.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitiveaffective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102(2), 246-268.

67.

Mixter, A. (2009). An exploration of adult playfulness in relationship to personality: a correlational study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, USA.

68.

Muthėn, L. K., & Muthėn, B. O. (2016). Mplus users guide (7.4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthėn & Muthėn.

69.

Olsen, E. T. (1981). An exploratory study of adault playfulness and some personality correlates (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, USA.

70.

Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

71.

Proyer, R. T. (2012). Examining playfulness in adults: Testing its correlates with personality, positive psychological funcioning, goal aspirations, and multi-methodically assessed ingenuity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 54(2), 103-127.

72.

Proyer, R. T., Ruch, W., & Chen, G. (2012). Positive psychology and the fear of being laughed at: Gelotophobia and its relations to orientations to happiness and life satisfaction in Austria, China, and Switzerland. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 25(1), 23-40.

73.

Schaefer, C. E. (1993). The therapeutic powers of play. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

74.

Schaefer, C., & Greenberg, R. (1997). Measurement of playfulness: A neglected therapist variable. International Journal of Play Therapy, 6(2), 21-31.

75.

Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

76.

Shen, X., Chick, G., & Zinn, H. (2014a). Playfulness in adulthood as a personality trait: A reconceptualization and a new measurement. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(1), 58-83.

77.

Shen, X., Chick, G., & Zinn, H. (2014b). Validating the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale (APTS): An Examination of Personality, Behavior, Attitude, and Perception in the Nomological Network of Playfulness. American Journal of Play, 6(3), 345-369.

78.

Solnit A. J. (1998). Beyond play and playfulness. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 53(1), 102–110.

79.

Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134(1), 138-161.

80.

Steiger, J. M., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual Spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City.

81.

Sutton-Smith, B. (1976). Current research and therapy on play, games and sports. In T. T. Craig (Ed.), The Humanistic and Metal Health Aspect of Sports, Exercise and Recreation (pp. 1-5). Chicago: American Medical Association.

82.

Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 291-300.

83.

Terr, L. (1999). Beyond love and work: Why adults need to play. New York, NY: Touchstone.

84.

Unger, R. K. (1979). Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. American Psychologist, 34(11), 1085-1094.

한국심리학회지: 건강