바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Development of Internet Game Speculative Experience Scale

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2020, v.25 no.4, pp.651-666
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.4.003



  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the “Internet Game Speculative Experience Scale”, used to determine if people who experience increasing curiosity or receptive attitudes toward gambling through the Internet game. For this purpose, the established operational definition and the constructive concept of the speculative trigger factor was used by examining previous studies, and interviews with 20 adults who regularly use Internet games to derive 10 criteria for experience in 10 ‘Internet game speculative experience’ were conducted. To select the final item, the questionnaire was conducted with 326 adolescents and adults who had loot box experience while using the game regularly. The group was classified by gender and age from the collected data, and the data were analyzed to determine if individual items developed in each sample had a significant relationship with variables related to gambling problems. The completed scale was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis, item analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity analysis. According to the results, the developed scale showed single factor structure, and the reliability was a stable. In addition, there was a significant positive correlation with gambling attitude, gambling ambiguity, online gambling behavior frequency, and gambling problems (PGSI). These results suggest that speculative experience during Internet games may affect online gambling behavior and gambling problems. Finally, the significance, limitations, and suggestions for follow-up studies of the scale developed in this study are discussed.

keywords
인터넷 게임, 게임 중 사행심 촉발경험, 척도 개발, 신뢰도, 타당도, Internet game, Internet speculative experience, scale development, reliability, validity

Reference

1.

권선중, 김교헌, 성한기, 이민규, 강성군 (2007). 성인과남자 청소년의 불법 인터넷 도박 문제와 위험 요인그리고 예방 전략. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(1), 1-19.

2.

권선중, 김교헌, 최지욱 (2006). 아동의 성인도박 인식실태와 도박성 게임행동 예측요인. 한국심리학회지:건강, 11(1), 147-162.

3.

권선중, 김예나 (2018). 청소년의 게임 내 확률형 아이템 구입 및 아이템 조합, 관련 방송 시청과 도박문제의 관계. 한국심리학회 학술대회 자료집, 2018(8), 354-354, 한국심리학회.

4.

권선중, 김예나 (2019). DSM-5 기반 청소년 인터넷 게임중독 선별척도 개발을 위한 예비연구. 상담학연구, 20(1), 211-225.

5.

권선중, 이충기, 김교헌, Suck Won Kim. (2010). 합법인터넷 도박의 역기능. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15(2), 215-225.

6.

김민정 (2015). 계획된 행동이론 모형이 SNS 사용행동을 예측하는가?. 충남대학교대학원 석사학위논문.

7.

모닝스브스 (2019. 4. 8). 캐릭터에 말 걸면 배팅 시작…도박 판치는 '바람의 나라'. SBS뉴스, https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1005211639&plink=COPYPASTE&cooper=SBSNEWSEND 에서 자료얻음

8.

오정수, 천은영 (2019). 체육계 대학생의 사행성 게임행동 실태와 사행성 게임중독 대학생의 사회심리적특성. 한국체육과학회지, 28(1), 197-213.

9.

이인혜 (2005). 한국판 도박 태도 및 신념 척도(GABS)의 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4), 531-546.

10.

한국도박문제관리센터 (2018). 2018 청소년 도박문제 실태조사 연구보고서. 서울: 한국도박문제관리센터.

11.

한국콘텐츠진흥원 (2019). 게임이용자 패널 5차년도 연구. 나주: 한국콘텐츠진흥원.

12.

Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, selfefficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 32(4), 665-683.

13.

Anthony, W. V. L., & Nower, L. (2019). Loot box: A nexus of Internet gambling and video gaming. 17th International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Las Vegas

14.

Brooks, G. A., & Clark, L. (2019). Associations between loot box use, problematic gaming and gambling, and gambling-related cognitions. Addictive behaviors, 96, 26-34.

15.

Hayes, A. F (2013). Process macro를 이용한 매개분석조절분석 및 조절된 매개분석[Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach](이형권역). 파주: 신영사.

16.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.

17.

Macey, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). eSports, skins and loot boxes: Participants, practices and problematic behaviour associated with emergent forms of gambling. New Media & Society, 21(1), 20-41.

18.

Zendle, D. (2019). The prevalence of loot boxes means that content descriptors are important. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pnq6x

19.

Zendle, D., & Cairns, P. (2018). Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PloS one, 13(11), e0206767.

20.

Zendle, D., & Cairns, P. (2019). Loot boxes are again linked to problem gambling: Results of a replication study. PloS one, 14(3), e0213194.

21.

Zendle, D., Cairns, P., Barnett, H., & McCall, C. (2020). Paying for loot boxes is linked to problem gambling, regardless of specific features like cash-out and pay-to-win. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 181-191.

22.

Zendle, D., Meyer, R., & Over, H. (2019). Adolescents and loot boxes: Links with problem gambling and motivations for purchase. Royal Society Open Science, 6(6), 190049.

23.

Zendle, D., Meyer, R., Waters, S., & Cairns, P. (2019). The prevalence of loot boxes in mobile and desktop games. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/mkhp2

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology