바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.5
Citation Share

Effects of Human Relations and Social Systems on Psychological Pain

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2020, v.25 no.5, pp.1041-1058
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.5.010




& (2020). Effects of Human Relations and Social Systems on Psychological Pain. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 25(5), 1041-1058, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2020.25.5.010
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to derive valid items for measuring exclusion experiences from human relations and social systems, for adolescents and adults, and based on this, to determine how each exclusion experience impacts psychological pain. The exploratory factor analysis found that exclusions from friends, siblings, mothers, co-workers, fathers, and lovers are valid items to measure the relationship-induced exclusion. It was also found that exclusions from government, politics, companies, economy, society, and education are valid items to measure the system-induced exclusion. Results showed that adolescents and adults perceive that they are more excluded from the social system than from human relations. It was also found that not only relationship-induced exclusion but also system-induced exclusion can cause psychological pain such as depression, anxiety, and loneliness. Finally, it is discussed that to alleviate psychological pain, it is necessary to consider human relations as well as the system of society in which individuals live.

keywords
인간관계, 사회시스템, 배척, 심리적 통증, 우울, 불안, 외로움, human relations, social systems, exclusion, psychological pain, depression, anxiety, loneliness

Reference

1.

권선중 (2014). 도박 관련 신념과 문제성 도박의 관계에대한 재탐색: 잠재성장모형을 활용한 단기 종단 연구. 청소년학연구, 21(4), 359-376.

2.

김교성, 노혜진 (2008). 사회적 배제의 실태와 영향요인에 관한 연구-퍼지 집합이론을 이용한 측정과 일반화선형모델 분석-. 사회복지정책, 34, 133-162.

3.

김교헌, 김지환 (1989). 한국판 UCLA 고독척도. 학생생활연구(충남대학교), 16, 13-30.

4.

김남희 (2016). 사회적 배척이 권력 추구와 소비에 미치는 영향: 성차의 역할을 중심으로. 충남대학교 박사학위논문.

5.

김연희, 신황용, 이희선 (2012). 사회적 배제가 행복에미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 사회복지연구, 43(3), 99-123.

6.

문진영 (2004). 사회적 배제의 국가간 비교연구-프랑스, 영국, 스웨덴을 중심으로. 한국사회복지학, 56(3), 253-277.

7.

박세연 (2017). 직장 내 배척 경험이 관계적 공격행동에미치는 영향: 통제감의 조절효과. 대구대학교 석사학위논문.

8.

신현숙, 안의자, 강병은 (2016). 여고생의 공적 자의식과사회불안의 관계에서 기본심리욕구 충족의 조절효과. 한국심리학회지: 학교, 13(3), 497-519.

9.

이준엽 (2012). 고용형태가 사회적 배제에 미치는 영향에관한 국가 간 비교연구. 건국대학교 석사학위논문.

10.

정수진 (2018). 사회적 배척상황에서 경계선 성격장애 경향군의 도구적 정서조절. 경북대학교 석사학위논문.

11.

통계청 (2015). 2015년 청소년 통계. 서울: 통계청, 여성가족부.

12.

통계청 (2019). 2018년 인구동향 조사 출생·사망통계 잠정 결과. 대전: 통계청 사회통계국 인구동향과.

13.

한국정보화진흥원 (2011). 스마트폰 진단척도 개발 연구. 서울: 한국정보화진흥원.

14.

한국청소년정책연구원 (2017). 한국 아동·청소년 인권실태조사. 세종: 한국청소년정책연구원.

15.

황혜인, 김연희, 이희선 (2018). 사회적 배제가 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향 및 임파워먼트의 매개효과분석. 한국공공관리학보, 32(2), 105-132.

16.

American pain society (1992). Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Pain in Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Juvenile Chronic Arthritis(2nd ed). Glenview, IL:American Pain Society.

17.

Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology (Statistical Section), 3, 77-85.

18.

Baum, A., Lee, C. M., & Dougall, A. L. (2011). Social stressors, social pain, and health. In G. MacDonald, & L. A. Jensen-Campbell (ed). Social pain: Neuropsychological and health implications of loss and exclusion(pp. 193-214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

19.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497.

20.

Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (1990). Pointcounterpoints:Anxiety and social exclusion. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(2), 165-195.

21.

Bhalla, A., & Lapeyre, F. (1997). Social exclusion:towards an analytical and operational framework. Development and Change, 28(3), 413-433.

22.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2000). Ecological systems theory. In A. Kazdin (ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology. Washington, DC & New York: American Psychological Association and Oxford University Press.

23.

Buckley, K. E., Winkel, R. E., & Leary, M. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 14-28.

24.

Cankaya, B., Chapman, B. P., Talbot, N. L., Moynihan, J., & Duberstein, P. R. (2009). History of sudden unexpected loss is associated with elevated interleukin-6 and decreased insulin-like growth factor-1 in women in an urban primary care setting. Psychosomatic Medicine, 71(9), 914-919.

25.

Caruso, E. M., Vohs, K. D., Baxter, B., & Waytz, A. (2013). Mere exposure to money increases endorsement of free-market systems and social inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 142(2), 301.

26.

Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1995). Conceptualizing stress and its relation to disease. In S. Cohen, R. C. Kessler, & L. U. Gordon (ed), Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 3-26). NewYork:Oxford University Press.

27.

Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290-292.

28.

Gunnar, M., & Quevedo, K. (2007). The neurobiology of stress and development. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 145-173.

29.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

30.

Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & MacDonald, G. (2011). Introduction: Experiencing the ache of social injuries-An integrative approach to understanding social pain. In G. MacDonald, & L. A. Jensen-Campbell (ed). Social pain:Neuropsychological and health implications of loss and exclusion(pp. 3-8). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

31.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

32.

Knack, J. M., Gomez, H. L., & Jensen-Campbell, L. A. (2011). Bullying and its long-term health implications. In G. MacDonald, & L. A. Jensen-Campbell (ed). Social pain:Neuropsychological and health implications of loss and exclusion(pp. 215-236). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.

33.

Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 187-208.

34.

Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 29(3), 202-214.

35.

Levine, C. S., Markus, H. R., Austin, M. K., Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2019). Students of color show health advantages when they attend schools that emphasize the value of diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(13), 6013-6018.

36.

MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202-223.

37.

Maslow, A. (1968). Some educational implications of the humanistic psychologies. Harvard Educational Review, 38(4), 685-696.

38.

Ruggieri, S., Bendixen, M., Gabriel, U., & Alsaker, F. (2013). Cyberball. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72(2), 103-109.

39.

Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(3), 472-480.

40.

Shearer, R., & Davidhizar, R. (1994). It can never be the way it was helping elderly women adjust to change and loss. Home Healthcare Now, 12(4), 60-65.

41.

Stewart, K. J. (2002). Measuring well-being and exclusion in Europe’s regions. London School of Economics Research Paper No. CASE053 “Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion”. London:London School of Economics Research.

42.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.

43.

Williams, K. D. (1997). Social ostracism. In Aversive interpersonal behaviors (pp. 133-170). New York:Springer, Boston, MA.

44.

Williams, K. D. (2001). Ostracism: The Power of Silence. New York: Guilford.

45.

Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.

46.

Williams, K. D., Bernieri, F. J., Faulkner, S. L., Gada-Jain, N., & Grahe, J. E. (2000). The scarlet letter study: Five days of social ostracism. Journal of Personal & Interpersonal Loss, 5(1), 19-63.

47.

Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 748-762.

48.

Wirth, J. H., & Williams, K. D. (2009). They don't like our kind': Consequences of being ostracized while possessing a group membership. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 111-127.

49.

Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 560-567.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy