바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

아내폭행 원인에 대한 통합적 모델 검증

Why Does Wife-Assault Occur?: An Intergrated Model Study for Influences of Social and Psychological Factors on Wife-Assault of Husband

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2004, v.18 no.3, pp.77-95
김지영 (중앙대학교)
최상진 (중앙대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

아내폭행은 여성이나 자녀에 대한 신체적, 심리적 문제를 야기하고 가족해체의 원인이 되기도 하는 심각한 사회문제이다. 그간 아내폭행에 관해서는 남편 개인의 특성이나 피해자인 아내의 특성, 경제적 스트레스 등의 원인들이 단편적으로 연구되어 왔다. 그러나 이러한 한, 두가지의 변인만으로 아내폭행 현상을 설명하는 것은 부족하다. 본 연구는 아내폭행이 남편의 개인적 특성, 부부관계, 상황적 특성, 문화 심리적 특성 등의 다양한 차원에 의해 유발된다고 보고, 그러한 각각의 차원에서 어떤 요인들이 어떻게 영향을 주고받으며 아내폭행으로 결과되는지를 알아보고자 경로를 가정하고 실증연구를 실시, 이를 검증하였다. 이를 위해 가정된 연구모델은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 남편의 자존감, 남편의 남녀평등의식은 부부간의 의사소통에 직접적으로 정적인 영향을 줄 것이다. 둘째, 남편의 스트레스는 직접적으로 남편의 공격성에 정적인 영향을 주고, 부부간의 의사소통은 직접적으로 남편의 공격성에 부적인 영향을 줄 것이다. 셋째, 남편의 공격성은 아내폭행에 직접적으로 정적인 영향을 줄 것이다. 마지막으로 남편의 원가족 폭력경험은 아내폭행에 직접적으로 정적인 영향을 줄 것이다. 이러한 연구모델과 스트레스가 의사소통으로 가는 경로가 제거된 연구경쟁모델을 비교했다. 연구결과, 경쟁모델보다 연구모델이 보다 적합한 모델로 채택되었다. 즉 남편 자신의 성격적 특성과 스트레스는 부부관계에 영향을 주고, 이러한 부부관계의 악화가 남편의 공격성을 활성화시켜 아내폭행을 야기한다고 할 수 있다. 반면 원가족에서의 폭력경험은 직접적으로 아내폭행에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다.

keywords
wife-assault, self-esteem, gender-egalitarianism, stress, witnessing inter-parental violence, marital communication, aggression, 아내폭행, 자존감, 공격성, 남녀평등의식, 스트레스, 원가족 폭력경험, 의사소통

Abstract

Recently, the family violence has been issued in Korean society. In particular, wife-assault, i.e., the violent behaviors of husbands to wives in which influenced on physical and psychological problems of women, children and adolescents have been neglected by Korean patriarchy. The objective of the present paper is to integrate research from a variety of disciplines, including sociology, psychology, and women studies and present a multilevel analysis that analyzes the dynamic interplay between individual and interpersonal factors, and situational factors in wife-assault. According to past researchers, wife-assaulter had high aggression, high stress situation, low self-esteem, low gender-egalitarianism, and witnessing inter-parental violence in the growing. In addition, the efficiency of the inter-spouse communication was important variable. The results revealed that low self-esteem, and low gender-egalitarianism had relation to low efficiency of marital communication. Then, this communication influenced on husband' aggression. These relationships leaded to wife assault. Stress influenced on wife-assault via aggression Also, stress influenced on wife-assault via marital communication and aggression. Witnessing inter-parental violence had direct relations with wife-assault. The result of this study summarized as followings; First, a various variables such as individual characteristics of husband, situational factors around the marital can influence simultaneously on bad marital relationship. Secondly, more worse marital relationship and stressful situations around husband, more activate husband's aggression. Thirdly, husband's aggression that is evoked by various antecedents can cause to lead his violent behavior to wife. Finally, an experience of witnessing inter-parental violence can have direct relation to wife-assault.

keywords
wife-assault, self-esteem, gender-egalitarianism, stress, witnessing inter-parental violence, marital communication, aggression, 아내폭행, 자존감, 공격성, 남녀평등의식, 스트레스, 원가족 폭력경험, 의사소통

참고문헌

1.

(1991) 부부갈등이 부부폭력과 자녀학대에 미치는 영향. 박사학위논문., 영남대학교

2.

(2000) 한국형 남녀평등의식검사 개발. ,

3.

(1998) 한국인의 스트레스와 가정폭력에 관한 연구. ,

4.

(1998) 저소득층의 아내구타 발생요인에 관한 연구. ,

5.

(1998) 청소년 스트레스가 폭력비행에 미치는 영향. ,

6.

(1992) 부부간 의사소통 및 결합력이 아내학대에 미치는 영향. 여성문제연구,

7.

(1998) 부부의 의사소통효율성과 스트레스 인지수준. , 전남대학교

8.

(1992) . 가족폭력의 세대간 전이에 관한 연구 부모의 폭력행동과 아동의 공격성 연구. 대한 가정학회지,

9.

(1994) . 기혼남성의 스트레스와 폭력 교우관계 분석. 효성여자대학교 박사학위논문.,

10.

(2000) 다변량분석. , 학지사.

11.

(1998) 대인간 오해에서 자존감의 수준과 자기평가기준의 효과. ,

12.

(1992) . 도시저소득층의 가족문제. 서울, 하우. 한국가족학회 편.

13.

(1984) . 가족스트레스와 사회 심리적 가족자원에 관한 연구. 한국가정관리학회지,

14.

(2000) 공격성이 동통반응에 미치는 영향. , 중앙대학교

15.

(2000) 개인특성, 스트레스 및 부부간의 의사소통과 결혼만족도의 관계. ,

16.

(1997) 직무 스트레스와 조직행동간의 인과적 관계모형 검증연구 제약 영업직 근로자들을 중심으로. ,

17.

(1974) . 자아개념 측정 가능성에 관한 연구. 연세논총, 107-130.

18.

(1989) . 사회계층에 따른 부부의 권력과 폭력의 관계. 대한가정학회지,

19.

(2001) 저는 오늘 꽃을 받았어요. , 도서출판 또 하나의 문화.

20.

(1999) 한국인의 self의 특성 서구의 self 개념과 대비를 중심으로. ,

21.

(1999) 친밀 대인관계에서 민감하게 작용하는 자아관여적 정서:무시 無視,

22.

(2003) 커버 스토리 ‘나도 아내를 때렸다’.,

23.

(2001) Self-esteem as a predictor of attitudes toward wife abuse among muslim women and men in Canada. ,

24.

(1993) . Alcohol use in male spouse abusers and their female partners. Journal of Family Violence,

25.

(2002) Criminal behavior, a psychological approach:Upper Saddle River, Prectice Hall.

26.

(2003) Did I do that? self-esteem-related differences in reactions to romantic partners' moods.,

27.

(1990) . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,

28.

(1980) . Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,

29.

(26-31.) Sr. M. J.(1970, . Measurement of marital communication. The Family Coordinator

30.

(1972) A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues,

31.

(1995) Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. ,

32.

(1992) . The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

33.

(2001) Life stress and violent behavior,

34.

(1995) Context for specific episodes of marital violence gender and severity of violence differences.,

35.

(1993) . Negative reciprocity and communication in couples with a violent husband. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,

36.

(1990) . Some social structures determinants of inconsistency between attitude and behavior The case of family violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family,

37.

(1988) . The role of personality in violent relationship. In Russell Violence in intimate relationship. New York, Pma Publishing Corp.

38.

(1986) . The application of stress theory to the study of family violence and prospects. Journal of Family Violence, principles

39.

(1971) . Violence against children. Journal of Marriage and Family,

40.

(1986) . Aggression and crimes of violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

41.

(1985) An evaluation of the self-esteem of marital violence men. Family Relations,

42.

(1988) . Who are those guys? Toward a behavioral typology of men who batter. Violence and Victims,

43.

(2001) Batterer program participants who repeatedly reassault. ,

44.

(2001) The incident of witnessing interparental violence and some of its psychological consequences among Arab adolescent. ,

45.

(1997) An empirical classification of motivation for domestic violence. Violence against Woman,

46.

(1986) . An analysis of risk markers in husband to wife violence The current state of knowledge. Violence and Victims,

47.

(1984) . Stability of Aggression over time and generation. Developmental Psychology,

48.

(1989) . Test of an argumentative skill deficiency model of interpersonal violence. Communication Monograph,

49.

(1997) Ethnic adaptations to occupational strain. ,

50.

(1993) . Mediators of husband-to-wife violence toward female intimate. Journal of Family Violence 8,

51.

(1984) . The intergenerational transmission of marital aggression. Journal of Marriage and The Family,

52.

(1981) . Comparison of two model of stress management Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of behavioral medicine,

53.

(1995) Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, Sage.

54.

(1998) Cognitive moderators of negative reactions to verbal aggression. ,

55.

(1996) Theories of human communication. , Wadsworth Publishing Company.

56.

(1988) violence in the family of origin A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Family Violence,

57.

(1987) . A brief measure for the assessment of anger and aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,

58.

(1988) . Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis The effects of sample size. Psychological Bulletin,

59.

(1998) Reconciling processing dynamics and personality dispositions. ,

60.

(2001) Anger on the off the road. ,

61.

(1994) . Positivity in marriage The role of discord and physical aggression against wives Journal of Marriage and Family,

62.

(1981) Characteristic of abusive couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,

63.

(1965) . Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

64.

(1995) Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: different concepts, different outcomes.,

65.

(1989) . Reply to Hamberger and Arnold. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,

66.

(2002) Emphatic inaccuracy in husband to wife aggression: The overattribution bias.,

67.

(1994) . Intra-individual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior incorporating psychological situation into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

68.

(1977) . The effect of self-esteem and evaluator demandingness on effort expenditure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

69.

(1997) Selective activation of traits boundary conditions for the activation of anger,

70.

(1990) . Interpersonal control and courtship aggression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,

71.

(1993183-201.) . A predictive Model of male spousal violence Journal of Family Violence,

72.

(2000) The intergenerationa transmission of spouse abuse A meta-analysis. ,

73.

(1979) scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family,

74.

(1980) . Social stress and marital violence in a national sample of american family. Annual of the New York Academy of Science,

75.

(1990) Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,

76.

(1987) . Communication pattern in physically aggressive engaged couples. Paper presented at the Third National Family Violence Research Conference University of New Hampshire.,

77.

(2001) Domestic violence. , U. S. Department of justice.

78.

(1974) . Violence in husband-wife interaction. NY, Harper & Row.

79.

(2001) Attitude toward marital violence.,

80.

(1998) Partner physical victimization in a national sample of american families. ,

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격