바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.24 No.1

Citation Share

자기 참조적 출처 기억에서의 자기 긍정 편향

Self-positivity bias in self-referential source memory

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2010, v.24 no.1, pp.47-61
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.1.004
김경미 (연세대학교)
이도준 (연세대학교)
김경미, & 이도준. (2010). 자기 참조적 출처 기억에서의 자기 긍정 편향. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 24(1), 47-61, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2010.24.1.004

초록

본 연구는 출처 점검 과제(source monitoring task)를 사용하여 자기 긍정 편향(self-positivity bias)의 영향으로 인해 출처 기억에서 자기 참조 효과(self-reference effect)의 크기가 기억 내용의 정서가에 따라 달라지는 지 살펴보았다. 참가자들이 자기 참조 및 타인 참조 부호화 조건에서 단어들을 학습한 직후 기억 검사를 받았던 실험 1에서는 긍정 형용사에 비해 부정 형용사에 대한 출처 기억에서 자기 참조 효과가 유의미하게 감소하였으며, 학습과 검사 사이에 24시간의 파지 간격을 둔 실험 2에서는 이러한 양상이 더욱 극대화되어 부정적 단어에 대한 출처 기억에서 자기 참조 효과가 사라지는 것으로 나타났다. 이와 같은 결과는 자기 긍정 편향으로 인해 동일 정서가의 정보일지라도 자신과의 관련성에 따라 그 출처가 기억되는 양상이 달라졌음을 의미한다. 본 연구는 자아를 참조하여 정보를 처리(self-referential processing)하는 것이 늘 더 정확한 기억을 유도하는 것은 아니며, 주로 부정적 측면에서 논의되어 온 기억 편파 및 왜곡이 자기 고양 동기의 실현 및 긍정적 자기 개념의 유지 등을 돕는 순기능적 역할 또한 수행할 수 있음을 밝혔다는 데 그 의의가 있다.

keywords
self-positivity bias, self-reference effect, source memory, source monitoring, memory bias, 자기 긍정 편향, 자기 참조 효과, 출처 기억, 출처 감시, 기억 편향

Abstract

The present study investigated whether the magnitude of self-reference effects would differ for positive versus negative information as a function of self-positivity bias within a source monitoring paradigm. In Experiment 1 where a memory test immediately followed a learning phase, the size of self-reference effects was significantly larger for the positive words compared to negative words. This decrease in the magnitude of self-reference effects for negative words was found to be more pronounced in Experiment 2 where a 24-hour interval was introduced between learning and memory test phases: no self-reference effect for negative words. The present findings suggest that due to the self-positivity bias, the association between a memory and its source become systematically biased toward positivity when a memory is self-relevant as well as toward negativity when a memory is about others. Overall, the current findings provide support for the crucial role of memory in maintaining and enhancing positive self-image and further suggest that memory bias, which has mostly been discussed for its negative consequences, may serve a functionally adaptive role by enhancing individuals' positive self perception and subjective well-being.

keywords
self-positivity bias, self-reference effect, source memory, source monitoring, memory bias, 자기 긍정 편향, 자기 참조 효과, 출처 기억, 출처 감시, 기억 편향

참고문헌

1.

Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, B. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and better-thanaverage effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804-825.

2.

Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.

3.

Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., & Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades. Psychological Science, 7, 265-271.

4.

Bower, G. H., & Gilligan, S. G. (1979). Remembering information related to one's self. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 420-432.

5.

Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox, Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.

6.

Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594-628.

7.

Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261-288.

8.

Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

9.

D'Argembeau, A., Comblain, C., & van der Linden, M. (2005). Affective valence and the self-reference effect: Influence of retrieval conditions. British Journal of Psychology, 96, 457-466.

10.

Dobbins, I. G. (2001). The systematic discrepancy between A' for overall recognition and remembering: a dual-process account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 587-599.

11.

Dunning, D. (1995). Trait importance and modifiability as factors influencing self- assessment and self-enhancement motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1297-1306.

12.

Hicks, J. L., & Cockman, D. W. (2003). The effect of general knowledge on source memory and decision processes. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 489-501.

13.

Hicks, J. L., & Marsh, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 117-122.

14.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.

15.

Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.

16.

Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 499-514.

17.

Kuiper, N. A., & Derry, P. A. (1982). Depressed and non-depressed content in self-reference in mild depressives. Journal of Personality, 50, 67-79.

18.

Leary, M. R. (2004). The self we know and the self we show: Self-esteem, self-presentation, and the maintenance of interpersonal relationships. In M. B. Brewer & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Emotion and motivation (pp. 204-224). Malden, MA: Usisher.

19.

Maki, R. H., & McCaul, K. D. (1985). The effects of self-reference versus other reference on the recall of traits and nouns. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 169-172.

20.

Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.

21.

Mather, M., & Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.

22.

Mather, M., Johnson, M. K., & DeLeonardis, D. M. (1999). Stereotype reliance in source monitoring: Age differences and neuropsychological test correlates. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 437-458.

23.

Mather, M. Shafir, E., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice. Psychological Science, 11, 132-138.

24.

Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 35-59.

25.

Norman, K. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition, 25, 838-848.

26.

Roedieger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.

27.

Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688.

28.

Sanz, J. (1996). Memory biases in social anxiety and depression. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 87-105.

29.

Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory. American Psychologist, 54, 182-203.

30.

Schwartz, R. M. (1986). The internal dialogue: On the asymmetry between positive and negative coping thoughts. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 591-605.

31.

Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.

32.

Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2000). On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 906-922.

33.

Silverman, I. (1964). Self-esteem and differential responsiveness to success and failure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 115-119.

34.

Strube, M. J. (1990). In search of self: Balancing the good and the true. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 699-704.

35.

Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 371-394.

36.

Swann, W. B., Jr. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.

37.

Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.

38.

Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R. M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of the self-enhancer: Well adjusted and well liked or maladjusted and friendless? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 165-176.

39.

Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 350-378). New York: Guilford Press.

40.

Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1040-1045.

41.

Walker, W. R., Skowronski, J. J., & Thompson, C. P. (2003). Life is pleasant - and memory helps to keep it that way! Review of General Psychology, 4, 203-210.

42.

Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246, 1232-1233.

43.

Weinstein, N. D., & Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1-8.

44.

Wilson, A. E., & Ross, M. (2003). The identify function of autographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11, 137-149.

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책