바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.25 No.4
Citation Share

The Self-enhancement and Its Relationship with Individual Adjustment

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.4, pp.61-76
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.004


& (2011). The Self-enhancement and Its Relationship with Individual Adjustment. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 25(4), 61-76, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.4.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

Self-enhancement and its implications for individual adjustment were investigated in this study. A total of 386undergraduate students rated themselves and others in their groups on the extent to which they actively participate in their group-based task. Using the scores of self-rating, rating by others, and rating of others, three self-enhancement indices were computed such as self-insight index (comparing self-rating with ratings by others), social comparison index (comparing self-rating with ratings of others), and social relations model index (subtracting perceiver effect and target effect from self-rating). The results of this study showed that self-insight index correlated positively with self-esteem and emotional stability, and negatively with individual performance. Social comparison index showed positive correlation with self-esteem and life satisfaction. In contrast to the self-insight index, social comparison index correlated positively with individual performance. SRM index showed positive correlation with only self-esteem. According to the degree of self-rating, rating by others, and rating of others, individuals were also classified into four groups as in-agreement/high raters, in-agreement/low raters,self-enhancers, and self-effacers. To investigate the difference between groups in terms of individual adjustment,one-way ANOVAs and post-hoc analysis were used. The findings suggest that the relationships between self-enhancement and individual adjustment vary with both self-enhancement indices and individual adjustment measures.

keywords
self-enhancement, self-insight index, social comparison index, SRM index, individual adjustment, 자기고양, 자기통찰 지표, 사회비교 지표, SRM 지표, 적응

Reference

1.

고재홍, 전병우 (2003). 두 자기평가의 편향과 자존감간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(2),1-16.

2.

노연희, 손영우 (2011). 자기평가의 정확도와 수행 및개인특성 간의 관계. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 24(1), 103-126.

3.

이영호 (1993). 귀인양식, 생활사건, 사건귀인 및 무망감과 우울의 관계: 공변량 구조모형을 통한 분석.서울대학교 박사학위 청구논문

4.

임낭연, 이화령, 서은국 (2010). 한국에서의 Diener의삶의 만족 척도(SWLS) 사용 연구 개관. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 29, 21-47.

5.

최해연, 구자숙 (2009). 자기기만적 고양의 방어성 논의. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23(4), 63-79.

6.

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychologicalinterpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.

7.

Atwater, L., & Yammarino, F. J. (1997). Self-otheragreement: a review and model. Research inPersonnel and Human Resource Management,15, 121-174.

8.

Atwater, L., Ostroff, C., Yammarino, F. J., &Fleenor, J. W. (1998). Self-other agreement: Doesit really matter? Personnel Psychology, 51,577-598.

9.

Bass, B. & Yammarino, F. J. (1991). Congruence ofself and others’ leadership ratings of navalofficers for understanding successful performance.Applied Psychology: An International Review,40, 437-454.

10.

Bonanno, G. A., Field, N. P., Kovacevic, A., &Kaltman, S. (2002). Self-enhancement as a bufferagainst extreme adversity: Civil war in Bosniaand traumatic loss in the United States.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,184-196.

11.

Campbell, W. K., Rudich, E.. A., & Sedikides, C.(2002). Narcissism, self-Esteem, and thepositivity of self-views: Two portraits ofself-love. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 28, 358-368.

12.

Colvin, C. R., Bolck, J., & Funder, D. C. (1995).Overly positive self-evaluations and personality:Negative implications for mental health. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 68,1152-1162.

13.

Cross, P. (1977). Not can but will college teachersbe improved? New Directions for HigherEducation, 17, 1-15.

14.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996).The robustness of test statistics to nonnormalityand specification error in confirmatory factoranalysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29.

15.

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larson, R. J., & Griffin,S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

16.

Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparisonprocesses. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

17.

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth,public-domain, personality inventory measuringthe lower-level facets of several five-factormodels. In Merviedle, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & FOstendorf(Eds.), Personality psychology inEurope(Vol. 7, pp.7-28). Tilburg UniversityPress: The Netherlands.

18.

Gramzow, R. H., Elliot, A. J., Asher, E. & Holly, A.(2003). Self-evaluation bias and academicperformance: Some reasons why. Journal ofResearch in Personality, 37, 41-61.

19.

Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positivemental health. New York: Basic Books.

20.

John, O. P., & Robins, R.W. (1994). Accuracy andbias in self-perception: Individual differences inself-enhancement and the role of Narcissism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66, 206-219.

21.

Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: Asocial relations analysis. New York: Guilford.

22.

Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The socialrelatons model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advancesin experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp.142-182). Orlando, FL: Academic.

23.

Kobayashi, C., & Brown, J. D. (2003). Self-esteemand self-enhancement in Japan and America.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34,567-580.

24.

Kurt, A., & Paulhus, D. L. (2008). Moderators of theadaptiveness of self-enhancement: Operationalizaton,motivational domain, adjustment facet,and evaluator. Journal of Research in Personality.42, 839-853.

25.

Kwan, V. Y., John, O. P., Kenny, D., Bond, M. H.,& Robins, R. W. (2004). Reconceptualizingindividual difference in self-enhancement bias:An interpersonal approach. Psychological Review,111(1), 94-110.

26.

Kwan, V. Y., John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Kuang,L. L. (2008). Conceptualizing and assessingself-enhancement bias: A componential approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,94(6), 1062-1077.

27.

Lönnqvist, J., Leikas, S., Verkasalo, M., & Paunonen,S. (2008). Does self-enhancement haveimplications for adjustment? Basic and AppliedSocial Psyhchology, 30, 377-386.

28.

Paulhaus, D. L. (1986). Self-deception and impressionmanagement in self-reports. In A. Angleitner &J. S. Wiggins (Eds.), Personality assessment viaquestionnaire. New York: Spronger-Verlag.

29.

Robins, R. W., & Beer, J. S. (2001). Positiveillusions about the self: Short-term benefits andlong-term costs. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 80(2), 340-352.

30.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent selfimage.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

31.

Scott, W. A. (1968). Concepts of normality. In E. F.Borgatta & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook ofpersonality: Theory and research. Rand-McNally:Chicago.

32.

Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sherman, D. K., Sage, R.M., & McDowell, N. K. (2003). Portrait of theself-enhancer: Well adjusted and wdll liked ormaladjusted and friendless? Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 84, 165-176.

33.

Taylor, S., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion andwell-being: A social psychological perspective onmental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103,193-210.

34.

Taylor, S., & Brown, J. (1994). Positive illusion andwell-being revusuted: Separating fact fromfiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21-27.

35.

Warner, R. M., Kenny, D. A., & Stoto, M. (1979). Anew round robin analysis of variance for socialinteraction data. Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology, 37, 1742-1757.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy