Differences in Reality Perception between SNS Heavy Users and Light Users: Cultivation and False Consensus Effects

나은영

doi:10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.3.005

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

Log In/Sign Up
P-ISSN1229-0653
KCI

Home

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

e-Submission

Vol.26 No.3

Citation Share

Differences in Reality Perception between SNS Heavy Users and Light Users: Cultivation and False Consensus Effects

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;

2012, v.26 no.3, pp.63-84

https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.3.005

(2012). Differences in Reality Perception between SNS Heavy Users and Light Users: Cultivation and False Consensus Effects. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 26(3), 63-84, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2012.26.3.005

copy

Abstract

The present study tested cultivation and false consensus effects by analyzing the difference of reality perception between SNS (Social Networking Service/Sites) heavy users and light users. An on-line survey was conducted on 960 quota-samples of 20’s～40’s males and females from 5 regions in Korea. Results indicated that twitter and facebook heavy-users showed smaller differences in their estimates of reality vs. twitter rates of people’s political orientations (conservatives, centrists, and liberals) than light users. This proves the cultivation effects, which posits that SNS heavy users perceive SNS more reflective of reality than light users. In particular, the conservative twitter heavy users estimated the rates of conservatives in SNS relatively highly, while the liberal twitter heavy users estimated the rates of liberals in reality relatively highly, so that the false consensus effects were also proved. Both heavy and light users of facebook showed strong false consensus effects. In general, SNS light users’ estimates were slightly closer to real survey data. At the same time, conservative SNS light users overestimated the rates of SNS liberals, so that a possible polarization of perceptions between heavy and light SNS users was also suggested. In the estimates of the rates of active SNS users, both twitter and facebook users showed strong false consensus effects; that is, the more they use the SNS, the higher estimates of active SNS users they produce. The estimates of the probability of victimization for crimes and unemployment ratio showed that SNS heavy users perceive our society more negatively than light users. The estimates of the probability of victimization through fabrication or crime and the rates of female professionals showed main effects of gender, which implies the disadvantageous experiences in reality also had considerable influence in reality perception. Cultivation and false consensus effects may be universal phenomena caused by misperceptions of others’ opinions, so that we should be careful not to overconsume homogeneous opinions in SNS.

keywords: SNS, Twitter, Facebook, Social Media, Cultivation, False Consensus, Heavy Users, Reality Perception, SNS, 트위터, 페이스북, 소셜미디어, 배양, 합의착각, 중이용자, 현실인식

Reference

김은미, 이동후, 임영호, 정일권 (2011). SNS혁명의 신화와 실제: 토크, 플레이, 러브의 진화. 나남출판사.

나은영 (2012). 심리학적 관점에서의 소셜 미디어. 한국사회의 정치적 소통과 SNS 세미나 발표논문집 (pp. 5～27). 한국언론학회 (2012. 6. 1.).

나은영, 한규석, 고재홍 (2003). 제16대 대통령 선거에서 TV토론의 효과와 제3자 효과: 세 지역 대학생을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 17(3), 145～158.

류정호, 이동훈 (2011). 소셜 미디어로서 마이크로 블로그 공론장의 정치적 의사소통에 대한 탐색적 연구: 네트워크 동질성 개념을 중심으로. 한국언론학보, 55(4), 309～330.

미디어 U (2012. 4. 16.). SNS 여론의 영향력, 어디까지 믿어야 할까. http://www.mediau.net/?p=4839

박승관 (1994). 드러난 얼굴과 보이지 않는 손. 전예원.

우형진 (2006). 문화계발이론의 ‘공명효과(resonance effect)’에 대한 재고찰: 위험인식에 대한 텔레비전 뉴스효과를 중심으로. 한국언론학보, 50(6), 254～276.

이민규, 우형진 (2004). 탈북자들의 텔레비전 드라마 시청에 따른 남한사회 현실 인식에 관한 연구: 문화계발효과와 문화동화이론을 중심으로. 한국언론학보, 48(6), 248～273.

이준웅, 장현미 (2007). 인터넷 이용이 현실 위험인식에 미치는 영향: 인터넷 문화계발효과에 대한 탐색적 연구. 한국언론학보, 51(2), 363～391.

10.

장덕진 (2012). 트위터, 누가 누구와 왜 어떻게 하나. 조화순 편저, 소셜네트워크와 정치변동(제6장, pp. 181～205). 도서출판 한울.

11.

중앙일보 (2011. 11. 29.). 또 하나의 미디어 SNS, 진실괴담 거름장치 있어야: 좌쏠림 현상 심한 한국 트위터. 6쪽.

12.

통계청 (2012. 4.). 실업률 자료. http://www.index.go.kr/egams/stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxMain.jsp?idx_cd=1063

13.

통계청, 여성가족부 (2012). 2012 통계로 보는 여성의 삶. 통계청.

14.

한겨레신문 (2011. 5. 16.). 창간23돌 ‘국민이념성향’ 조사.

15.

행정안전부, 한국정보화진흥원 (2011). 2011 정보격차지수 및 실태조사 요약보고서. http://socialro.co.kr/?p=292

16.

Adoni, H., & Mane, S. (1984). Media and the social construction of reality: Toward an integration of theory and research. Communication Research, 11(3), 323～340.

17.

Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 19, 31～35.

18.

Bauman, K. P., & Geher, G. (2002). We think you agree: The detrimental impact of the false consensus effect on behavior. Current Psychology, 21(4), 293～318.

19.

Bilandzic, H. (2006). The perception of distance in the cultivation process: A theoretical consideration of the relationship between television content, processing experience, and perceived distance. Communication Theory, 16(3), 333～355.

20.

Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. W. (2008). Transportation and transportability in the cultivation of genre-consistent attitudes and estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508～529.

21.

Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54, 662～704.

22.

Busselle, R. W., Ryabovolova, A., & Wilson, B. (2004). Ruining a good story: Cultivation, perceived realism and narrative. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 29(3), 365～378.

23.

Carveth, R. & Alexander, A. (1985). Soap opera viewing motivations and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting &Electronic Media, 29, 259～273.

24.

Doob, A. N., & McDonald, G. E. (1979). Television viewing and fear of victimization: Is the relationship causal? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 170～179.

25.

Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence porfile. Journal of Communication, 26, 172～199.

26.

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., Morgan, N., & Jackson-Beck, M. (1979). The demonstration of power: Violence profile No. 10. Journal of Communication, 29, 177～196.

27.

Gilovich, T., Jennings, D. L., & Jennings, S. (1983). Causal focus and estimates of consensus: An examination of the false-con년 effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 550～559.

28.

Hawkins, S., & Pingree, I. (1981). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumption in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7(4), 291～301.

29.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

30.

Hetsroni, A. (2008). Overrepresented topics, underrepresented topics, and the cultivation effect. Communication Research Reports, 25(3), 200～210.

31.

Hetsroni, A., & Tukachinsky, R. (2006). Television-world estimates, real-world estimates, and television viewing: A new scheme for cultivation. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 13 3～156.

32.

Jeffres, L. W., Neuendorf, K., & Bracken, C. C. (2008). Integrating theoretical traditions in media effects: Using third-person effects to link agendasetting and cultivation. Mass Communication & Society, 11, 470～491.

33.

Judd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & Krosnick, J. A. (1983). Judging the positions of political candidates: Models of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 952～963.

34.

Kinder, D. R. (1978). Political person perception: The asymmetrical influence of sentiment and choice on perceptions of presidential candidates. Journalof Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 859～ 871.

35.

Krahé, B. (1983). Self-serving bias in perceived similarity and causal attributions of other people’s performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46(4), 318～329.

36.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

37.

Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential election. New York: Columbia University Press.

38.

Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72～90.

39.

Marks, G., Miller, N., & Maruyama, G. (1981). Effect of targets’ physical attractiveness on assumptions of similarity. Journal of Personlality and Social Psychology, 41, 198-206.

40.

Miller, K. (2005). Communications theories: Perspectives, processes, and contexts. New York: McGraw-Hill.

41.

Miller, N., & Marks, G. (1982). Assumed similarity between self and other: Effect of expectation of future interaction with that other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(2), 100～105.

42.

Minnebo, J., & Eggermont, S. (2007). Watching the young use illicit drugs: Direct experience, exposure to television and the stereotyping of adolescents’ substance use. Young, 15, 129～144.

43.

Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal Of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 337～355.

44.

Perse, E. M., Ferguson, D. A., & McLeod, D. M. (1994). Cultivation in the newer media environment. Communication Research, 21(1), 79～104.

45.

Reimer, B. & Rosengren, K. E. (1990). Cultivated viewers and readers: A life-style perspective. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 181～206). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

46.

Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279～301.

47.

Rossler, P., & Brosius, H. B. (2001). Do talk shows cultivate adolescents’ views of the world? A prolonged-exposure experiment. Journal of Communication, 51, 143～163.

48.

Shrum, L. J. (2004). The cognitive processes underlying cultivation effects are a function of whether the judgments are on-line or memory-based. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 29(3), 327～344.

49.

Shrum, L. J. (2007). The implications for survey method for measuring cultivation effexts. Human Communication Research, 33(1), 64～80.

50.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207～232.

51.

Wilder, D. A. (1984). Perceptions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 323～333.

52.

Williams, D. (2006). Virtual cultivation: Online worlds, offline perceptions. Journal of Communication, 56, 69～87.

53.

Zuckerman, M., Mann, R. W., & Bernieri, F. J. (1982). Determinants of consensus estimates: Attribution, salience, and representativeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 839～852.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.26 No.3

Differences in Reality Perception between SNS Heavy Users and Light Users: Cultivation and False Consensus Effects

Abstract

Reference

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology