바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
 

logo

도박 게임의 승․패에 따른 각성 수준과 배팅 액의 변화: 충동성의 중재효과를 중심으로

The Effect of the gambling condition(win/loss) on the arousal and the amount of betting in undergraduates: the moderating effect of impulsivity

한국심리학회지: 건강 / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2009, v.14 no.2, pp.235-253
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.2.002
황현국 (강원대학교 심리학과)
이인혜 (강원대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

병적 도박자들은 충동적인 성향을 가지고 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. Gray의 모델에 의하면, 충동적인 사람들은 긍정적인 자극에 강한 반응을 보이지만, 처벌 자극에 대해 둔감하다고 한다. 본 연구는 대학생 집단에서 충동성 성향이 강한 것으로 알려진 병적 도박자 집단이 긍정적 강화와 처벌 조건으로 구성되는 도박 조건에 따라 피부전도반응(각성 수준)과 도박 행동(배팅 액)의 차이가 있는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 594명의 대학생들에게 K-NODS와 충동성 질문지를 작성하도록 하였고, 13명의 병적 도박자 집단과 13명의 정상 집단을 선발하였다. 594명의 대학생들에게 K-NODS와 충동성 질문지를 작성하도록 하였고, 13명의 병적 도박자 집단과 13명의 정상 집단을 선발하였다. 실험연구에서, 실험 참여자들은 슬롯머신 게임을 수행하였다. 기저선, 도박 게임의 승, 그리고 도박 게임의 패라는 도박 조건에서 전기피부반응을 측정하였고, 도박 게임의 승과 패 조건에서 배팅 액이 기록되었다. 실험 결과, 각성 수준이나 도박 행동에 대해 도박 조건의 차별적인 효과를 확인할 수 없었다. 그렇지만, 병적 도박자 집단은 승 조건에서 피부전도반응과 도박 행동(배팅 액)에서 정상 집단보다 유의하게 높은 피부전도반응과 배팅 액을 보였다. 이 결과가 시사하는 바와 본 연구의 제한점에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
skin conduction response, arousal, impulsivity, pathological gambling, 전기피부반응, 각성 수준, 충동성, 병적 도박, skin conduction response, arousal, impulsivity, pathological gambling

Abstract

This study investigated whether skin conduction response(arousal) and gambling behavior(the amount of betting) is different in pathological gambling group(13) and control group(13) during the positive reinforcement(win) as well as punishment(loss). 594 undergraduates completed the K-NODS and impulsivity questionnaire(BIS-11). 594 undergraduates asked to complete K-NODS and BIS-11. They were divided two group according to th severity of gambling, the experimental subjects(N=26) were selected. 13 subjects were of pathological gambling group, 13 subjects were of normal group. In the experimental study, The two groups were administrated a slot machine game. Skin conduction response as the index of arousal and the amount of betting as gambling behavior was measured when participants played a slot machine. This Study was failed to find the differentiated effect of arousal and the amount of betting depending on gambling conditions. However, Pathological gambling group had higher SCR and the amount of betting compared to control group when was exposed to positive stimuli(win og gambling). Finally, limitations and suggestions of this study were discussed.

keywords
skin conduction response, arousal, impulsivity, pathological gambling, 전기피부반응, 각성 수준, 충동성, 병적 도박, skin conduction response, arousal, impulsivity, pathological gambling

참고문헌

1.

김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 K-NODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 487-509.

2.

박윤창, 이미경, 윤진 (1995). 자극추구동기가 청소년 비행에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제, 2, 1, 53-64.

3.

이인혜 (1997). 정신생리학. 서울: 학지사.

4.

이인혜 (2004). 카지노 도박자의 성별, 게임 선호유형 및 도박의존성과 심리적 특성 간의 관계: 비합리적 도박신념과 충동성을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(2), 351-379.

5.

이현수 (1989). 성격 및 개인차의 심리학. 서울: 우성문화사.

6.

이현수 (1992). 충동성 검사. 서울: 한국가이던스.

7.

이흥표 (2003). 병적 도박의 충동성과 감각추구: 알코올 중독과의 비교. 대한신경정신의학회지, 42, 1, 89-95.

8.

Abt, V. (1987). Advancing research on problem gambling. Paper presented at the Seventh International Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking, Reno, NV.

9.

Allock, C. C., & Grace, D. M. (1998). Pathological gamblers are neither impulsive nor sensation-seekers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 22, 3, 307-311.

10.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.

11.

Anderson, G., & Brown, R. I. F. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 401-410.

12.

Arnett, J. (1994). Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 289-296.

13.

Barratt, E. (1983). The biological basis of impulsiveness: The significance of timing and rhythm disorders. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 4, 387-391.

14.

Barratt, E. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing In J. T. Spence & C. E. Izard(Eds.), Motivation, emotion and personality(pp. 137-146). North Holland: Elsevier Science Phublishers.

15.

Blanchard, E. B., Wulfert, E., Freidenberg, B. M., & Malta, L. S. (2000). Psychophysiological assessment of compulsive gamblers' arousal to gambling cues: a pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 25, 3, 155-165.

16.

Blaszczynski, A. P., & MaConaghy, N. (1989a). Anxiety and/or depression in the pathogenesis of addictive gambling. International Journal of Addictions, 24, 337-350.

17.

Blaszczynski, A. P., & MaConaghy, N., & Frankova, A. (1991). Control versus abstinence in the treatment of pathological gambling: a two to nine year follow-up. British Journal of Addiction, 86(3), 299-306.

18.

Blaszczunski, A. P., Wilson, A. C., & McConaghy, N. (1986). Sensation-seeking and pathological gambling. British Journal of Addiction, 81(1), 113-117.

19.

Blaszczynski, A, P., Winters, S, W., & McConaghy, N. (1986). Plasma endorphin levels in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2(1), 3-14.

20.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1994). The gambling beliefs and attitudes survey. Unpublished instrument: University of Delaware.

21.

Breen, R. B., & Zuckerman, M. (1999). Chasing in gambling: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(6), 1097-1111.

22.

Carroll, D., & Huxley, J. A. A. (1994). Cognitive, dispositional, and psychophysiological correlates of dependent Slot machine gambling in young people. Journal of Applied social psychology, 24(12), 1070-1083.

23.

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333.

24.

Coulombe, A., Ladouceur, R., Desharnais, R., & Jobin, J. (1992). Erroneous perceptions and arousal among regular and occasional video poker players. Journal of Gambling Study, 8, 235-244.

25.

Coventry, K. R., & Norman, A. C. (1997). Arousal, Sensation seeking and frequency of gambling in off-course horse racing bettors. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 671-681.

26.

Dickerson, M., Hinchy, J., Fabre, J., & Cunningham, R. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling behavior. I. High-frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237-248.

27.

Dickerson, M. (1993). Internal and external determinants of persistent gambling: problems in generalizing form one form to another. In W. R. Eadington, & J. A. Cornelius, Gambling behavior and problem gambling. Reno: Institute For the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming.

28.

Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL; Charles Thomas.

29.

Eysenck, S. B. G. & Eysenck, H. J. (1963). On the dual nature of extraversion. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2, 46-55.

30.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1977). The place of impulsiveness ina dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 57-68.

31.

Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613-619.

32.

Fowles, D C (1980). The three arousal model: implications of gray's two-factor learning theory for heart rate, electrodermal activity, and psychopathy. Psychophysiology, 17(2), 87-104.

33.

Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Edwin de Beurs, Wim Van den Brink. (2004). Pathological gambling: a comprehensive review of biobehavioral findings. Neuroscience and Behavioral Review, 28, 2, 123-141

34.

Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck' theory of personality. In H. F. Eysenck, A model of personality (pp. 246-276). Springer: New York.

35.

Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

36.

Gray, J. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269-288.

37.

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety(2nd ed.)Oxford: Oxford University Press.

38.

Gray, J. A., Owen, S., Davis, N., & Tsaltsas, E. (1983). Psychological and physiological relations between anxiety and impulsivity. In M. Zuckerman, Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity and anxiety. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

39.

Griffiths, M. D. (1990). The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 1, 31-42.

40.

Griffiths, M. D. (1993). Factors in problem adolescent fruit machine gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies 9, 31-45.

41.

Lacey, J. I. (1959). Psychophysiological approaches to the evaluation of psychotherapeutic process and outcome. In E. A. Rubenstein & M. B. Parloff(Eds.). Research in psychotherapy. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 160-208.

42.

Lorenz, V. C., & Yaffee, R. A. (1986). Pathological gambling: psychosomatic, emotional, and marital difficulties as reported by the gambler. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 40-49.

43.

Matthews, G., & Gilliland, K. (1999). The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: a comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583-626.

44.

Meyer, G., & Fanian, T. (1992). Deliquency among pathological gambler: a causal approach. Journal of Gambling Studies, 8(1), 61-77.

45.

Routtenberg, A., (1968). The two arousal hypothesis: Reticular formation and limbic system. Psychological Review, 75, 51-80.

46.

Vitaro, F., Ferland, F., Jacques, C., & Ladouceur, R. (1998). Gambling, substance use, and impulsivity during adolescence. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 3, 185-194.

47.

Sharpe, L., Tarrier, N., Schotte, D., & Spence, S. H. (1995). The role of autonomic arousal in problem gambling. Addiction, 90, 11, 1529-1540.

48.

Zuckerman, M., & Breen, R. B. (1999). 'Chasing' in gambling behavior: personality and cognitive determinants. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 1097-1111.

49.

Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The big three, the big five, and the alternative five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-76.

50.

Zuckerman, M. (1999). Vulnerability to Psychopathology: a Biosocial Model. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association Press.

한국심리학회지: 건강