The actual condition, participation rate of gambling and prevalence of pathological gambling in South-Korea - Based on gambling type -

한성열; 이흥표; 허태균; 장훈

doi:10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.2.003

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Log In/Sign Up
KOREAN
P-ISSN1229-070X
E-ISSN2713-9581
KCI

Home

OA Policy

Article Contents

Prev Next

e-Submission

Vol.14 No.2

Citation Share

The actual condition, participation rate of gambling and prevalence of pathological gambling in South-Korea - Based on gambling type -

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581

2009, v.14 no.2, pp.255-276

https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.2.003

& (2009). The actual condition, participation rate of gambling and prevalence of pathological gambling in South-Korea - Based on gambling type -. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 14(2), 255-276, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.2.003

copy

Abstract

This study intended to divide gambling into different categories and to understand actual condition and participation rate of gambling and the prevalence of the pathological gambling in south-korea through an examination of the whole country. 1,805 survey participants were recruited by using a stratified sampling based on sex, age, and areas. Results showed that most frequent gambling activities were whatu/card games, lotto, and online gambling games. A yearly prevalence of pathological gambling was 3.0%(K-NODS)～3.8%(K-MAGS). Among the gambling types, the prevalence of pathological gambling of whatu/cards, lotto, online games, and other lotteris was 2.1～3.9%. The prevalence of stocks and illegal gambling was highly significant with 21.1%, 9.1～40%. Results of whole social loss from gambling showed online games, lotto and whatu/cards to be in order from low to high respectively. When stocks were included, stocks were the highest in the social loss. The suggestions, significance, and critical points of the current study have been discussed as well.

keywords: gambling, pathological gambling, prevalence, participation rate, gambling, pathological gambling, prevalence, participation rate, 도박, 병적 도박, 유병률, 이용율

Reference

김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 KNODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 487-509.

김교헌, 성한기, 이민규 (2004). 도박성 게임 이용자의 심리사회적 특성과 문제성 및 병적 도 박 예측요인. 한국심리학회: 건강, 9(2), 285-320.

김교헌, 이흥표, 권선중 (2005). 한국사회의 병적 도박 유병률에 대한 연구: KNODS, KMAGS 및 KSOGS의 추정치 비교. 한국심리학회: 건강, 10(2), 227-242.

김교헌 (2006). 도박행동의 자기조절모형: 상식모형의 확장. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(2), 243 -274.

동아일보 (2000.12.19). 젊은 주식투자자 4명중 1명 ‘중독증’.

백용호, 차명준 (1994). 도박심리를 이용한 주식투자 행태분석. 증권학회지, 16, 395-435.

유승훈 (2006). 다산과 연암, 노름에 빠지다. 서울: 살림.

이민규, 김교헌, 김정남 (2003). 도박중독 실태와 도박 중독자의 심리사회적 특성-지역별 비 교를 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 399-414.

이상규 (2006). 합법적 도박과 불법 도박의 실태 비교. 2006년도 한국마사회 연구용역보고서.

10.

이인혜 (2005). 한국판 도박 태도 및 신념 척도(GABS)의 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(4). 531-546.

11.

이영호 (2006). 도박에 대한 태도 및 신념척도의 타당도 및 신뢰도에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 25(1). 2891-298.

12.

이흥표 (2002). 도박의 심리. 서울: 학지사

13.

이흥표 (2003). 비합리적 도박신념이 병적 도박에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 22(2), 415-434.

14.

이흥표 (2004). 5요인 도박동기의 검증과 도박동기가 도박심각도에 미치는 영향:문제성 및 병적 도박자를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(3), 555-569.

15.

이흥표, 이상규, 이재갑, 김한우, 김태우 (2007). 습관성 도박의 이론과 실제. 서울: 학지사.

16.

이태원, 김석준 (1999) 도박의 정치경제학: 한국사회의 도박합법화와 도박문제의 확산에 대한 비판적 접근. 사회와 역사, 56, 179-214.

17.

임자영, 현명호 (2005). 승리접근경험이 도박행동에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집, 32-33.

18.

인코그룹 (2002). 병적도박 실태조사 및 치료프로그램 연구용역 보고서. 한국마사회/국민체육진흥공단 공동용역.

19.

정대연 (1992). 사회통계학. 서울: 백산서당.

20.

최완철, 김경빈, 오동열, 이태경 (2001). 한국형 사우스오크 병적도박 검사 표준화에 대한 예비연구. 중독정신의학, 5, 46-52.

21.

한겨레 (2008.6.8). 한게임 게임머니 거래 사행성 논란.

22.

한국마사회 (2004). 도박중독 척도 개발 및 발병률 조사. 충남대학교 2004년도 한국마사회 연구용역 보고서.

23.

한국마사회 (2009). ‘전국민대상 대규모 도박이용실태 조사’ 연구용역을 위한 사전조사 기획 연구 용역. 고려대학교 2009년도 한국마사회 연구용역 보고서.

24.

한국문화관광정책 연구원 (2006). 사행산업 이용실태 조사분석 연구. 문화관광부.

25.

황상연 (2006). SERI 경제 포커스 제 111호 ‘사행산업과 소비'. 삼성경제연구소.

26.

MBC 뉴스 (2008.6.3). 한게임, 도박의 바다에 빠지다. PD수첩.

27.

SBS 뉴스 (2008). http://news.sbs.co.kr/section_news/ news_read.jsp?news_id=N. 000499528.

28.

Abbott, M. W., & Volberg, R. A. (1992). Frequent gamblers and problem gamblers in New Zealand. Research Series No. 14. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

29.

American psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed.(DSM-IV). Washington, DC: Author.

30.

Becona, E., Lorenzo, M., & Fuentes, M. J. (1996). Pathological gambling and depression. Psychological Reports, 78, 635-640.

31.

Black D. W., & Moyer, T. (1998). Clinical features and psychiatric comobidity of subjects with pathological gambling behavior. Psychiatric Services, 49, 1434-1439.

32.

Custer, R. L. (1984). Profile of the pathological gambler. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 45, 35-38.

33.

Dombrink, J. D. (1981). Outlaw businessman: Organized crime and the legalization of casino gambling. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

34.

Ferris, J. & Wynne. H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index Final Report. Report to the Canadian Inter-Provincial Task Force on Problem Gambling.

35.

Govoni R., & Mann, R. (2004). A Qualitative Study of Self-Identified Speculative Investors. Toronto, ON: Responsible Gambling Council.

36.

Kallick-kaufman, M., & Reuter, P. (1979). Gambling in the US: Public finance or public problem? introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 145-162.

37.

Korn, D., Gibbins, R., & Azmier, J. (2003). Framing public policy towards a public health paradigm for gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 19(2), 235-256.

38.

Ladouceur, R. (1991). Prevalence estimates of pathological gamblers in Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 732-734.

39.

Lee, H. P., Chae, P. K., Lee, H. S., & Kim, Y. K. (2007). The five-factor gambling motivation model. Psychiatry Research, 150, 21-32.

40.

Lesieur, H. R., & Rosenthal, R. J. (1991). Pathological gambling: A review of literature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 5-39.

41.

National Council on Problem Research and Public Policy Committees (1997). Problem and Pathological Gambling in America: The National Picture. Columbia, Md, National Council on Problem Gambling.

42.

National Research Council on The Social and Economic Impact of Pathological Gambling (1999). Pathological Gambling, A Critical Review. National Academy Science.

43.

National centre for social research(2007). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. Gambling Commission.

44.

Productivity Commission (1999). Australia's gambling industries: final report. Canberra: Government Press.

45.

Queensland Government (2001). Queensland Household Gambling Survey 2001. Gambling Policy Directorate Office of the Government Statistician.

46.

Rosenthal, R. J. (1992). Pathological Gambling. Psychiatric Annals, 222, 72-78.

47.

Shaffer, H. J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K. M., & Cummings, T. N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts gambling screen. Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 339-362.

48.

Smith, G. J. & Wynne, H. J. (2002). Final Report: Measuring gambling and problem gambling in Alberta: Using the Canadian problem gambling index (CPGI). Alberta Gaming Research Institute.

49.

Taber. J. I & McCormick. R. A (1987) The Prevalence and Impact of Major Life Stressors among Pathological Gamblers. The International Journal of The Addictions. 22(1). 71-79.

바로가기메뉴

Article Contents

Vol.14 No.2

The actual condition, participation rate of gambling and prevalence of pathological gambling in South-Korea - Based on gambling type -

Abstract

Reference

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology