바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

Article Contents

Next
e-Submission

Vol.14 No.3

Citation Share

Studying Gambling Addiction in Korea: The Proceedings of a Workshop on the Estimation of the Prevalence of Gambling Addicts in Korea

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2009, v.14 no.3, pp.481-495
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.3.001


& (2009). Studying Gambling Addiction in Korea: The Proceedings of a Workshop on the Estimation of the Prevalence of Gambling Addicts in Korea. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3), 481-495, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2009.14.3.001

Abstract

At a recent workshop, several South Korean scholars discussed the difficulties and importance of knowing the number of addicted gamblers in Korean order to address issues related to pathological gambling. First, it is important to agree on the definition of a gambling addict. Several perspectives were presented including that of the clinical definition of a pathological gambler and a definition that was dependent on the negative impact gambling had on a person’s life, which could be financial, familial, business related, etc. Each of these perspectives required the use of a different measurement system, such as the CPGI or SOGS. It was decided that a standard definition and index was needed in order to standardize estimations, reduce confusion, and ease the burden placed on researchers. Survey sampling methods also affect estimations based on surveys. Koreans generally use a quota sampling method, but a random sampling method is more scientific and is the international standard. The phrasing of survey questions also affects whether or not people answer. A survey on "leisure activities" is more likely to be answered than one on "gambling." The workshop was successful in encouraging dialogue between Korean scholars in order to begin to address these issues.

keywords
도박중독, 유병률, 병적 도박, 문제 도박, 병리 모형, 피해 모형, gambling addiction, prevalence, pathological gambling, problem gambling, pathologic model, harm model, gambling addiction, prevalence, pathological gambling, problem gambling, pathologic model, harm model

Reference

1.

김교헌 (2003). 병적 도박 선별을 위한 K-NODS의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(3), 487-509.

2.

김교헌 (2006a). 중독과 자기조절: 인지신경과학적 접근. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(1), 63-105.

3.

김교헌 (2006b). 도박행동의 자기조절 모형: 상식모형의 확장. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(2), 243-274.

4.

김교헌 (2007). 중독, 그 미궁을 헤쳐 나가기. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(4), 677-693.

5.

김교헌 (2009). 한국 도박중독 문제의 책임과 대처. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 27-39.

6.

김교헌, 이흥표, 권선중 (2005). 한국사회의 병적 도박 유병률에 대한 연구: KNODS, KMAGS 및 KSOGS의 추정치 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 10(2), 227-242.

7.

이광희 (2009). 사회조사연구의 품질향상을 위한 과제관리 개선방안연구. 한국학술진흥재단연구보고서(연구보고-2008-006-학술정책).

8.

이순묵, 김종남 (2009). 도박중독 문제의 본질에 충실한 평가/진단 및 비율의 산정. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 1-26.

9.

이순묵, 김종남, 최삼욱, 현명호, 김수진 (2009). 도박의 정의와 범주화에 대한 개념의 명확화. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28(1), 1-27.

10.

이순묵, 현명호, 최삼욱, 김종남, 김수진 (2008). 한국형 도박중독 변별척도 개발 연구. 사행산업통합감독위원회 연구용역 보고서.

11.

조성겸 (2009). 전화여론조사의 예측정확도 분석. 조사연구. 10(1). 57-72.

12.

조성겸, 김지연, 나윤정, 이명진 (2007). 선거여론조사의 문제점과 개선방향: 2006년 지방선거 전화조사를 중심으로. 조사연구. 8(1). 31-54.

13.

최완철, 김경빈, 오동열, 이태경 (2001). 한국형 사우스 오크 병적 도박 검사 표준화에 대한 예비연구. 중독정신의학, 5(1), 46-52.

14.

한국문화관광연구원 (2006). 사행산업 이용실태 조사 분석 연구. 문화관광부.

15.

한국문화관광연구원 (2008). 사행산업 이용실태 조사 분석 및 총량조정 연구. 사행산업통합감독위원회 연구용역 보고서.

16.

한성열, 허태균, 이흥표 (2008). 도박 이용실태 및 도박중독 유병률 조사. 고려대학교, 한국마사회 연구용역 보고서.

17.

홍성준, 박소형, 김선웅 (2009). 국내유선 전화조사에서 표본추출틀의 포함율. 조사연구 10(1), 33-56.

18.

허명회, 김영원 (2008). RDD표본대 전화번호부 표보. 2007년 대통령 선거예측사례. 9(3). 55-70.

19.

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

20.

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

21.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

22.

Cho, S. K., & Cho, E. H. (2009). How to obtain better survey results on life science issues? in J. R. Yoon (Ed), ELSI Issues on Current Biotechnology.(pp.176-180). Seoul: Marubol Publication.

23.

Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index. Final Report. Phase II final report to the Canadian Interprovincial Task Force on Problem Gambling.

24.

Gerstein, D., Murphy, S., Toce, M., Hoffmann, J., Palmer, A., Johnson, R., Larison, C., Chuchro, L., Buie, T., Engelman, L., and Hill, M.A. (1999). Gambling Impact and Behavior Study. Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission.

25.

Hyman, S, E. (2005). Addiction: A disease of learning and memory. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(8), 1414-1422.

26.

Kalivas, P. W., & Volkow, N. D. (2005). Neural basis of addiction: A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(8), 1403-1413.

27.

Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2001). Drug addiction, dysregulation of reward and allostasis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 22, 97-129.

28.

Ladouceur, R., Jacques, C., Chevalier, S., Sevigny, S., & Hamel, D. (2005). Prevalence of pathological gambling in Quebec in 2002. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(8), 451-456.

29.

Lesieur, H., & Blume, S. F. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen(SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184-1188.

30.

Neal, P., Delfabbro, P., & O'Neil, M. (2005). Problem Gambling and harm: A national definition. Adelaide, Australia: South Australian Centre for Economic Studies.

31.

Nestler, E. J. (2005). Is there common molecular pathway to addiction? Nature Neuroscience, 8(11), 1445-1449.

32.

Potenza, M. N. (2006). Should addictive disorders include non-substance-related conditions? Addiction, 10(Suppl. 1), 142-151.

33.

Shaffer, H., & Korn, D. (2002). Gambling and related mental disorders: A public health analysis. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 171-212.

34.

Svetieva, E., & Walker, M. (2008). Inconsistency between concept and measurement: The Canadian Problem Gambling Index(CPGI). Journal of Gambling Issues: Issue 22, December, 157-173.

35.

Young, M., & Stevens, M. (2008). SOGS and CPGI: Parallel comparison on a diverse population. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 337-356.

36.

Wardle, H., Sproston, K., Orford, J., Erens, B., Griffiths, M., & Constantine, R. (2007). British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2007. National Centre for Social Research.

37.

Williams, R. J., & Robert, T. W. (2007). The Proportion of Ontario Gambling Revenue Derived from Problem Gamblers. Canadian Public Policy, 33(3), pp. 367-387. University of Toronto Press on behalf of Canadian Public Policy <http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 30032540> Accessed 13 June 2009.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy