바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.15 No.4
Citation Share

The relationship between religious orientation, religious coping and situational forgiveness

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2010, v.15 no.4, pp.699-710
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2010.15.4.008


& (2010). The relationship between religious orientation, religious coping and situational forgiveness. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 15(4), 699-710, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2010.15.4.008
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

The present study explored whether religious variables have effects on situational forgiveness. Using a sample of 154 Christians, this study examined the relationship between religiousness,religious coping and situational forgiveness. All religious measures were correlated with situational forgiveness, but positive religious coping was not correlated with forgiveness variable. According to the result of the correlations, we tested the mediation. Since there was no correlation between intrinsic religiousness and negative religious coping, these two variable were excluded from mediation test. Result of testing mediation indicated that negative religious coping play the role of a mediator between extrinsic religiousness and situational forgiveness. These findings have important practical implications regarding the forgiveness-religion link for Christians, suggesting that the forgiveness intervention is needed to promote to forgive effectively. Also decreasing negative religious coping might be important in forgiveness in specific transgressions.

keywords
종교 성향, 종교적 대처, 상황적 용서, 가해상황, religiousness, religious coping, situational forgiveness, transgression

Reference

1.

김동기(2003). 종교심리학. 학지사:서울

2.

박종효(2003). 용서와 건강의 관련성 탐색. 한국 심리학회지:건강, 3(2), 301-321.

3.

반신환(2006). 대학생의 종교와 종교적 대처: 내담자의 종교. 한국기독교상담학회지, 11, 139-155.

4.

심수명 (1993). 기독교인의 종교성향에 따른 자아 분화와 죄책감. 고려대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.

5.

오영희(2008). 한국인 용서 척도 개발을 위한 예비연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(4), 1045-1063.

6.

오영희(2010). 한국인 용서 척도 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15(1), 1-15.

7.

오오현(2002). 기독교인 용서상담 프로그램 개발 및 효과 연구. 한국기독교상담심리치료학회, 4, 117-150.

8.

조혜윤, 손은정(2008). 종교성향과 불안과의 관계에서 종교적 대처와 낙관성의 매개 효과. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치 료, 20(2), 773-793.

9.

최명심, 손정락(2010). 내재적 종교 성향과 삶의 의미에서 종교적 대처의 매개역할 검증. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15(1), 91-105.

10.

Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. W. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 5, 432-443.

11.

Baron, R. M & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,1173-1182.

12.

Brown, R. P., Barness, C. D., & Campbell, N. J. (2007). Fundamentalism and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1437-1447.

13.

Compas, B. E., Jeniffer, K. C., Saltzman, H. Thomsen, A. H. & Wadsworth, E. M. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research, Psychology Bulletin, 127, 87-127.

14.

Coyle, C. T., & Enright, R. D. (1997). Forgiveness intervention with postaboration men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 1042-1046.

15.

Enright, R. D. (2001). Forgiveness is a Choice. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.

16.

Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group. (1991). The Moral Development of Forgiveness. In W. Kurtines & J. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (Vol.1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Enright, R. D., & Fitzgibbons, R. P. (2000). Helping Clients Forgive: An Empirical Guide for Resolving Anger and Restoring Hope. Washington, DC.: American Psychological Association.

18.

Enright, R. D., Gassin, E. A., & Wu, C. (1992). Forgiveness: A development view. Journal of Moral Education, 21, 99-114.

19.

Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 64, 983-992.

20.

Gorsuch, R. L., & Hao, J. Y. (1993). Forgiveness: An exploratory factor analysis and its relationships to religious variables. Review of Religious Research, 34, 333-347

21.

Hathaway, W., & Pargament, K. I. (1990). Intrinsic Religiousness, Religious Coping, and Psychosocial Competence: A Covariance Structural Analysis. Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 29, 423-411.

22.

Jonhson, R. L. (1992). Religion in society: A Sociology of Religion. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

23.

Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

24.

Lewis, C. A., Maltby, J., & Day, L. (2003). Religious orientation, religious coping and appraisals of stress: assessing primary appraisal factors in the relationship between religiosity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1209-1224.

25.

Marty, M (1998). The ethos of Christian forgiveness. In E. L. Worthington, Jr (Ed.), Dimensions of Forgiveness. (pp. 9-28). Philadelphia: Templeton Foundation Press.

26.

McCullough, M. E., & Worthington, E. L., Jr. (1999). Religion and the forgiving personality. Journal of Personality, 67, 1141-1164.

27.

McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Jr., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationship: Theoretical elaboration and measurment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.

28.

Pargament, K. I (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, and Practice. London: Guilford Press.

29.

Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (1998). The Many Methods of Religious Coping: Initial Development and Validation of the RCOPE. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

30.

Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping: Initial development and validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519-543.

31.

Pargament, K. I., Kennel, J., Hathaway, W., Grevengoed, N., Newman, J., & Jones, W. (1988). Religion and problem-solving process: Three styles of coping. Journal for Scientific Study and Religion, 30(4), 90-104.

32.

Rakely, J. V. (1993). The relationship of marital satisfaction, forgiveness, and religiosity. Doctoral Dissertation. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburgh, VA. USA.

33.

Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.

34.

Spilka, B., Hood, R. W., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (2003). The Psychology of Religion: An Empirical Approach (3d Ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

35.

Strean, P., & Covic, T. (2006). A Review of forgiveness process models and a coping framework to guide future research. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(10), 1059-1085.

36.

Subkoviak, M. J., Enright, R. D., Wu, C., Gassin, E. A., freedman, S., Olson, L. M. & Sarinopoulous, I. (1995). Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 18, 641-655.

37.

Toussaint, L. L., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Everson, S. A., (2001). Forgiveness and health: Age differences in a US probability sample. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 249-257.

38.

Worthington, Jr. L. (2001). Five Step to Forgiveness. NY: Crown Publisher.

39.

Worthington, Jr. L. (Ed.) (2005). Handbook of Forgiveness. New York: Routledge

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy