바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

The Effect of Pet on Happiness through Support-Seeking Emotion Regulation: A Mediation Model Moderated by Mindfulness

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2018, v.23 no.4, pp.1001-1018
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2018.23.4.010


Abstract

This study examined whether emotion regulation and mindfulness would explain the mechanism of pet effect. Previous research revealed some inconsistencies in terms of pet effect on psychological health. Based on previous findings, the present study aimed to find a moderator that might change the relationship between pet ownership and happiness. We examined mindfulness as a moderator and support-seeking emotion regulation as a mediator. A one-time online survey was administered to 423 adults in Korea. Our results showed that support-seeking emotion regulation mediated the relationship between pet ownership and happiness. In addition, the path from support-seeking emotion regulation to happiness depended on the acceptance subtype of mindfulness. The mediating effect was stronger for individuals with a high level of acceptance than for those with a low level of acceptance. Implications and limitations of these results were discussed at the end.

keywords
반려동물, 행복, 정서조절, 마음챙김, 조절된 매개모형, pet, happiness, emotion regulation, mindfulness, moderated mediation

Reference

1.

김세영, 박형인 (2017). 반려동물효과: 반려동물 소유와심리적 건강 간 관계의 메타분석 연구. 사회과학연구, 28, 101-115.

2.

농림축산식품부 (2017. 12. 17). 국민 대다수 동물 보호, 복지 필요성에 대해 공감. 보도자료. http://www.mafra.go.kr/mafra/293/subview.do?enc=Zm5jdDF8QEB8JTJGYmJzJTJGbWFmcmElMkY2OCUyRjMxNTA4MiUyRmFydGNsVmlldy5kbyUzRg%3D%3D

3.

민경환, 김지현, 윤석빈, 장승민 (2000). 부정적 정서조절 방략에 관한 연구-정서종류와 개인 변인에 따른정서조절 양식의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 14, 1-16.

4.

서은국, 구제선 (2011). 단축형 행복척도(COMOSWB)개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회: 사회 및 성격, 25, 95-113.

5.

윤석빈 (1999). 경험하는 정서의 종류와 선행사건에 따른 정서조절 양식의 차이. 서울대학교 석사학위 청구논문.

6.

이자영, 최웅용 (2012). 사회적 지지가 대학생의 심리적안녕감에 미치는 영향 - 인지적 정서조절을 매개로하여. 상담학연구, 13, 1481-1499.

7.

이지영 (2012). 연령증가에 따른 정서조절의 차이-청소년기와 성인기를 대상으로. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 31(3), 783-808.

8.

이지영, 권석만 (2009). 성별과 성격유형에 따른 정서조절방략 사용의 차이. 한국심리학회지: 일반, 28, 507-524.

9.

이혜진, 박형인 (2015). 마음챙김 기반 치료의 효과: 메타분석 연구. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 34, 991-1038.

10.

조용래 (2009). 한국판 개정된 인지적 및 정서적 마음챙김 척도의 신뢰도와 타당도. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 28, 667-693.

11.

허지애, 김정문(2017). 자기격려와 지각된 스트레스 및심리적 안녕감의 관계: 지지추구적 정서조절양식의조절된 매개효과. 스트레스연구, 25, 44-51.

12.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13.

Allen, K. (2003). Are pets a healthy pleasure? The influence of pets on blood pressure. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 12, 236-239.

14.

Argyle, M. (1999). Causes and correlates of happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.353-373). New York:Russell Sage Foundation.

15.

Amiot, C., Bastian, B., & Martens, P. (2016). People and companion animlas: It takes two to tango. BioScience, 66, 552-560.

16.

Antonacopoulos, N. M. D., & Pychyl, T. A. (2010). An examination of the potential role of pet ownership, human social support and pet attachment in the psychological health of individual living alone. Anthrozoös, 23, 37-54.

17.

American Veterinary Medical Association (2012). U. S pet ownership and demographics sourcebook. Schaumburg, IL: Author.

18.

Beck, L., & Madresh, E. (2008). Romantic partners and four-legged friends: An extension of attachment theory to relationships with pets. Anthrozoös, 27, 103-112.

19.

Becker, T. E. (2005). Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 8, 274-289.

20.

Bishop, S., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N., Carmody, J., . . . Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230-241.

21.

Brown, K., & Ryan, R. (2003). The benefit of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 822-848.

22.

Chur-Hansen, A., Winefield, H., & Beckwith, M. (2008). Reasons given by elderly men and women for not owning a pet, and the implication for clinical practice and research. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 977-981.

23.

Chur-Hansen, A., Winefield, H., & Beckwith, M. (2009). Companion animals for elderly women:The important of attachment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6, 281-293.

24.

DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

25.

Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 193, 542-575.

26.

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.

27.

Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., & Cacciopo, J. (2008). Creating social connection through inferential reproduction. Psychological Science, 19, 114-120.

28.

Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177-190.

29.

Gilbey, A., McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. (2007). A longitudinal test of the belief that companion animal ownership can help reduce loneliness. Anthrozoös, 20, 345-353.

30.

Grav, S., Hellzen, O., Romild, U., & Strodal, E. (2011). Association between social support and depression in the general population: The HUNT study, a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21, 111-120.

31.

Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281-291.

32.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348-362.

33.

Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

34.

Herzog, H. (2011). The impact of pets on human health and psychological well-being: Fact, fiction, or hypothesis? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 236-239

35.

Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10, 144-156.

36.

Kanat-Maymon, Y., Antebi, A., & Zilcha-Mano, S. (2016). Basic psychological need fulfillment in human-pet relationships and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 69-73

37.

Knight, S., & Edwards, V. (2008). In the company of wolves, the physical, social, and psychological benefits of dog ownership. Journal of Aging and Health, 20, 437-455.

38.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141-169.

39.

McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 61-70.

40.

McConnell, A., Brown, L., Shoda, T., Stayton, L., & Martin, C. (2011). Friends with benefits: On the positive consequence of pet ownership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1239-1252.

41.

Mennin, D., Fresco, D., Ritter, M., & Heimberg, R. (2015). An open trial of emotion regulation therapy for generalized anxiety disorder and cooccurring depression. Depression and Anxiety, 32, 614-623.

42.

Miller, D., Staats, S., & Partlo, C. (1992). Discriminating positive and negative aspects of interaction: Sex differences in the older population. Social Indicators Research, 27, 363-374.

43.

Mitchell, R. (2001). Americans’ talk to dogs:Similarities and differences with talk to infants. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 183-210.

44.

Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. L. (1999). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.330-350). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

45.

Podberseck, A. (2009). Good to pet and eat: The keeping and consuming of dots and cats in South Korea. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 615-632.

46.

Ramirez, M., & Hernandez, R. (2014). Benefits of dog ownership: Comparative study of equivalent samples. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 9, 311-315.

47.

Ryff, C., & Keyes, C. (1995) The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719-727.

48.

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publication, Inc.

49.

Serpell, J. (1991). Beneficial effects of pet ownership on some aspects of human health and behavior. Journal of Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 717-720.

50.

Staats, S., Wallace, H., & Anderson, T. (2008). Reasons for companion animal guardianship (pet ownership) from two populations. Society and Animals, 16, 279-291.

51.

Valeri, R. (2006). Tails of laughter: A pilot study examining the relationship between companion animal guardianship (pet ownership) and laughter. Society & Animals, 14, 275-293.

52.

Ward, M. K., & Meade, A. W. (2018). Applying social psychology to prevent careless responding during online surveys. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67, 231-263,

53.

Wells, D. (2009). The effects of animals on human health and well-being. Journal of Social Issue, 65, 523-543.

54.

Westen, D. (1994). Toward an integrative model of affect regulation: Application to social-psychological research. Journal of Personality, 62, 641-647.

55.

Zilcha-Mano, S., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. (2011). An attachment perspective on human-pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 345-357.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology