바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

ISSN : 1229-0653

Article Contents

Prev Next
e-Submission

Vol.21 No.1
Citation Share

Empirical Scaling of Common Verbal Phrases Associated with Numerical Probabilities in Korean Vocabulary

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2007, v.21 no.1, pp.47-58
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.1.004


& (2007). Empirical Scaling of Common Verbal Phrases Associated with Numerical Probabilities in Korean Vocabulary. Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 21(1), 47-58, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2007.21.1.004
  • Downloaded
  • Viewed
PDF Download

Abstract

This study was conducted to show communication correspondence between speakers and receivers in employing Korean numerical wording. In study 1, participants were required to estimate the numerical probability of Korean words selected from a Korean dictionary and scales in the Psychological Scaling Handbook in two contexts：no context condition and minimum context condition. Results showed corresponding numerical probability estimates of each of 56 probability-related words and phrases in Korean vocabulary. Generally they were reasonably consistent, but several words with similar meanings were different from standard deviations. Study 2 with additional rating data of the ranges of Korean probability-related words, which was conceptual replication of study 1, showed result consistent with study 1. These two studies are meaningful in that they supplied data of probability-related words in Korean. The implications of context effects on numerical probabilities in ordinary communication settings could be plausible and other suggestions for further studies were discussed.

keywords
한국어 어휘, 확률 수치, 맥락효과, 확률 어휘, Korean vocabulary, probability estimate, probability-related words and phrases, context effects

Reference

1.

이수원 (1969). 수량형용사에서의 배경효과에 대한 분석. 한국심리학회지, 1(2), 62-67.

2.

이숭녕 (1990). 국어사전. 서울：금성출판사.

3.

고려대학교부설행동과학연구소 (1999). 심리척도 핸드북. 서울：학지사.

4.

Beyth-Marom, R. (1982). How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expres- sions. Journal of Forecasting, 1, 257-269.

5.

Brun, W., & Teigen, K. H.(1988). Verbal probabilities：Ambiguous, context dependent, or both. Organiza- tional Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 41, 390-404.

6.

Budescu, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S.(1985). Consistency in interpretation of probabilistic phrases. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 36, 391- 405.

7.

Erev, I., Cohen, B.(1990). Verbal versus numerical probabilites：Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox. Organizational Behavior & Human Deci- sion Processes, 45, 1-18.

8.

Lichtenstein, S., Fischoff, B., & Phillips, L. D.(1967). Calibration of probabilities：State of the art to 1980, in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgement under Uncertainty：Heuristics and biases, New York：Cambridge University Press.

9.

Lichtenstein, S., & Newman, J. R.(1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilites. Psychonomic Science, 9(10), 563-564.

10.

Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Rapaport, A., Zwick, R., & Forsyth, B.(1986). Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. Journal of Experimental Psy- chology：General, 115, 348-365.

11.

Wallsten, T. S., Budescu, D. V., Zwick, R., & Kemp, S. M. (1993). Preferences and reasons for commu- nicating probabilistic information in verbal or numer- ical terms. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31 (2), 135-138.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy