바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

ACOMS+ 및 학술지 리포지터리 설명회

  • 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI) 서울분원 대회의실(별관 3층)
  • 2024년 07월 03일(수) 13:30
사전등록 바로가기
 

logo

  • P-ISSN1229-0653
  • KCI

ISSN : 1229-0653

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.22 No.1

Citation Share

나보다 나은 사람 혹은 못난 사람은 나에 대한 평가에 영향을 미치는가? : 한국과 미국 대학생들을 중심으로

Does Superior or Inferior Others Influence Self-evaluation?：Focusing on Korean and American College Students

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2008, v.22 no.1, pp.43-61
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2008.22.1.003
장은영 (한양대학교)
장은영. (2008). 나보다 나은 사람 혹은 못난 사람은 나에 대한 평가에 영향을 미치는가? : 한국과 미국 대학생들을 중심으로. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 22(1), 43-61, https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2008.22.1.003

초록

본 연구에서는 자신보다 우월하거나 열등한 사람이 자기평가에 영향을 미치는 조건을 알아보았다. 또한 집합주의 문화권의 사람들은 자기향상동기가 더 우세하고, 개인주의 문화권의 사람들은 자기고양동기가 더 우세하다는 점에 기초하여, 문화차이도 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 2(성공/실패 경험)×2(상향비교/하향비교)×2(비교횟수가 많음/적음)의 설계로 이 변인들이 전반적 자기평가에 미치는 효과를 한국대학생과 미국대학생들을 대상으로 알아보았다. 한국 대학생들을 대상으로 얻은 결과를 보면, 이들은 성공하였거나 실패하였거나에 상관없이 상향비교하면 자기평가가 중간 정도로 유지되었다. 반면에 성공하였을 때보다 실패하였을 때 하향비교하면 자기평가가 더 낮았다. 또한 성공하고나서 상향비교하면 비교횟수가 많을 때 자기평가가 더 낮았으며, 실패하고나서 하향비교하면 비교횟수가 많을 때 자기평가가 더 낮았다. 미국 대학생들을 대상으로 얻은 결과를 보면, 이들은 하향비교할 때에는 비교횟수에 따라 전반적 자기평가가 달라지지 않았으나, 상향비교할 때에는 비교횟수가 많을수록 자기평가가 더 높았다. 또한 실패하고나서 상향비교하면 비교횟수가 많을 때 전반적 자기평가가 더 높았다. 이상에서 얻은 결과를 사회비교가 자기평가에 미치는 효과를 설명하는 선행연구들과 연결하여 논의하고, 제한점을 언급하였다.

keywords
사회비교, 자기평가, 상향비교, 하향비교, 인지적 관점, 동기적 관점, 사회비교동기, 문화 차이, Social comparison, Self-evaluation, Upward comparison, Downward comparison, Cognitive perspective, Motivational perspective, Social comparison motives, Cross- cultural perspective

Abstract

This study investigated whether self-evaluation is influenced by superior or inferior others. In addition, on the basis of the perspective that self-improvement motive is dominant among people from collectivistic cultures and self-enhancement motive is dominant among people from individualistic cultures, the role of cultural difference was also explored. For this purpose, with the design of 2 (success / failure experience) × 2 (upward / downward comparison) × 2 (high / low frequency of comparison), the effects of those variables on global self-evaluation were tested among Korean and American college students. The main results were as follows: Koreans' self-evaluation after upward comparison was not affected by experiences of success and failure. Meanwhile, self-evaluation after downward comparison were lowered by experiencing failure. In addition, their self-evaluation got lowered by frequent upward comparison after experiencing success and by frequent downward comparison after experiencing failure. American students' self-evaluation after downward comparison was not affected by the frequency of comparison. However, self-evaluation after upward comparison increased through frequent comparisons. Additionally, global self-evaluation got higher by the frequency of upward comparison after experiencing failure. Finally, results of the present study were discussed in line with previous research and the limitations of this study and the implications for future studies were discussed.

keywords
사회비교, 자기평가, 상향비교, 하향비교, 인지적 관점, 동기적 관점, 사회비교동기, 문화 차이, Social comparison, Self-evaluation, Upward comparison, Downward comparison, Cognitive perspective, Motivational perspective, Social comparison motives, Cross- cultural perspective

참고문헌

1.

한덕웅 ; 장은영, (2003) 사회비교가 분노경험, 주관안녕 및 건강지각에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 건강

2.

장은영 ; 한덕웅, (2004) 사회비교의 목표, 대상 및 결과가 비교대상의 선택에 미치는 영향, 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격

3.

Herr, P.M., (1986) Consequences of priming：Judgment and behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

4.

Brown, J. D., (1992) When Gulliver travels：Social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

5.

Eagly, A.H., (1993) The psychology of attitudes, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich

6.

Heine, S.J., (1999) Culture, self- discrepancies, and self-satisfaction, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

7.

Fabrigar, L. R., (1998) The impact of attitude accessibility on elaboration of persuasive messages, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

8.

Heine, S. J., (2001) Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America：An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

9.

Hetts, J.J., (1999) Two- roads to positive regard：Implicit and explicit self- evaluation and culture, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

10.

Hofstede, G., (1980) Culture's consequences：Interna- tional differences in work-related values, Sage

11.

Kitayama, S., (1997) Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self：Self- enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan, Journal of Personality and Social Psy- chology

12.

Kruglanski, W.A., (1990) Classic and current social comparison research：Expanding the perspective, Psychological Bulletin

13.

Lockwood, P., (1997) Superstars and me：Predicting the impact of role models on the self, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

14.

Mussweiler, T., (2001) Focus of comparison as a deter- minant of assimilation versus contrast in social comparison, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

15.

Mussweiler, T., (2003) “Everything is relative”. Com- parison processes in social judgment, European Journal of Social Psychology

16.

Mussweiler, T., (2002) I know you are but what am I? Self-evaluative consequences of judging ingroup and outgroup members, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

17.

Mussweiler, T., (2004) The man who wasn´t there. Subliminal social standards influence self-evaluation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

18.

Mussweiler, T., (1999) Hypothesis- consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm：A selective accessibility model, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

19.

Mussweiler, T., (2000) Numeric judgment under uncertainty：The role of knowledge in anchoring, Journal of Experimental Social Psychol- ogy

20.

Pelham, B.W., (1995) The waxing and waning of the social self：Assimilation and contrast in social comparison, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

21.

Petty, R.E., (1986) Communication and persuasion：Central and peripheral routes to attitude change, Springer-Verlag

22.

Schwinghammer, S. A., (2006) Different selves have different effects：Self-activation and defensive social comparison, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

23.

Stapel, D.A., (2004) From seeing to believing：Subliminal social comparisons affect implicit and explicit self-evaluations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

24.

Stapel, D.A., (2000) Distinctness of others and malleability of selves：Their impact on social comparison effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

25.

Stapel, D.A., (2001) I, we, and the effects of others on me：How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

26.

Stapel, D.A., (2007) Distinctiveness is key：How different types of self-other similarity moderate social comparison effects, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

27.

Taylor, S.E., (1996) Social comparison, self-regulation, and motivation in : Motivation & Cognition, Guilford Press

28.

Trampe, D., (2007) On models and vases：Body dissatisfaction and proneness to social comparison effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

29.

Triandis, H.C., (1989) The self and social behavior in differing culture contexts, Psychological Review

30.

White, K., (2005) Culture and social comparison seeking：The role of self-motives, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격

논문 투고 OA 정책