바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

인지부하와 베타 주파수 분석을 이용한 거짓말 탐지

Cognitive Load and EEG Beta Spectrum Analysis for Deception Detection

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격 / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.1, pp.43-56
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.003
함진선 (중앙대학교)
정재영 (대검찰청 심리분석실)
이장한 (중앙대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구의 목적은 거짓말 탐지의 인지모델 이론에 근거하여 거짓말 생성에 따른 인지부하를 중추신경계 인지처리과정의 핵심적인 지표로 알려진 베타 주파수 분석을 통해 진실과 거짓 반응의 차이를 확인하는데 있다. 이를 위해, 20명의 남자 대학생(거짓집단 11명, 진실집단 9명)을 대상으로 3차원 컴퓨터 시뮬레이션을 이용한 모의범죄 시나리오와 인지부하를 차별화시킨 거짓말 탐지 질문 패러다임(사실과 같게 응답하는 '사실 반응조건', 사실과 다르게 응답하는 '사실 역반응조건')을 사용하여 거짓말에 따른 인지부하 정도를 측정하였다. 연구 결과, 거짓 집단의 경우, 범죄관련 질문에 대한 ‘사실 역반응조건’에서 베타 주파수의 절대파워가 ‘사실 반응조건'보다 유의미하게 증가하였으며, 진실집단의 경우 질문 조건 간 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 범죄행위에 대한 ‘사실 역반응 질문기법’을 이용하여 거짓말의 인지부하를 증가시킨 결과, 거짓 집단만이 인지적 노력의 지표로 알려진 베타 주파수의 활동이 활발하게 나타났다. 이상의 연구 결과를 통해, 거짓말에 수반되는 인지부하를 과학적인 방법으로 측정함으로써 거짓말의 인지처리과정에 관한 유용한 정보를 제공하며 거짓말 탐지의 타당성을 높이는데 기여할 수 있다.

keywords
lie detection, cognitive load, spectrum analysis, mock crime, 거짓말 탐지, 인지 부하, 주파수 분석, 모의범죄

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences between truthful and deceptive responses detecting cognitive load underlying the basis of the cognitive model of lie generation by cognitive processing of central nervous system by EEG beta spectrum analysis. To test this, 20 male university students (11 guilty participants, 9 innocents) answered the differentiation of deception-question paradigm manipulating cognitive load (instruction: truth response vs. truth-reverse response) and to perform the 3D simulated mock-crime scenario in this experiment. Results showed that guilty participants had higher beta power activity when they were instructed to answer as truth-reverse response than truth response for crime-relevant questions whereas innocents didn't. As results of increasing cognitive load underlying lie using a truth-reverse response to crime-relevant question, liars reacted with significantly greater beta power activity as an index of cognitive demand. These findings provide useful information and evidence of cognitive processing underlying deception by scientific measurement of cognitive load and also lead to a better validity of lie detection.

keywords
lie detection, cognitive load, spectrum analysis, mock crime, 거짓말 탐지, 인지 부하, 주파수 분석, 모의범죄

참고문헌

1.

김시업, 전우병, 김경하, 김미영, 전충현 (2005). 용의자의 거짓말 탐지를 위한 비언어적 단서 탐색. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 19, 151-162.

2.

김영윤 (2005). P300-기반 거짓말 탐지 연구. 한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격, 23, 111-129.

3.

박판규 (2003). 거짓말탐지검사. 서울: 삼우사.

4.

Abootalebi, V., Moradi, M.H., & Khalilzadeh, M. A.(2006). comparison of methods for ERPassessment in a P300-based GKT. InternationalJournal of Psychophysiology, 62, 309-320.

5.

Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theoriesand applications in the detection of deception.New York: Springer-Verlag.

6.

Boaz, T. L., Perry, N. W., Raney, G., & Fischler, I.S. (1991). Detection of guilty knowledge withevent-related potentials. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 76, 788-795.

7.

Bradley, M. T., & Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness ofcrime-relevant information and the guiltyknowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 55-59

8.

Briggs, G. E., Peter, G. L., & Fisher, R. P. (1972).On the locus the divided attention effects.Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 315-320.

9.

Broadbent, D. E. (1957). A mechanical model forhuman attention and immediate memory.Psychological Review, 64, 205-215.

10.

Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonaldeception theory. Communication Theory, 6,203-242.

11.

Crawford, H. J. & Vasilescu, P. (1995). DifferentialEEG pattern activity of low and high sustainedattention adults during decision-making tasks.Psychophysiology, 32 (Suppl. 1), S26.

12.

DePaulo, B. M., & Kashy, D. A. (1998). Everydaylies in close and causal relationships. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 74, 63-79.

13.

DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E.,Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H.(2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin,129, 74-118.

14.

Ekman, P. (1992). Telling lies. New York: Norton

15.

Farewell, L. A., & Smith, S. S. (2001). Using brainMEMBER testing to detect knowledge despiteefforts to conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences,46, 135-143.

16.

Ford, E. B. (2006). Lie detection: Historical,neuropsychiatric and legal dimensions.International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 29,159-177.

17.

Geiselma, R. E., & Callot, R. (1990). Reverse andforward order recall of script based text. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 141-144.

18.

Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe.American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.

19.

Granhag, P. A., & Stromwall, L. A. (2002). Repeated interrogations: Verbal and nonverbal cues todeception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16,243-257.

20.

Hahm, J. S., Ji, H. K., Jeong, J. Y., Oh, D. H., Kim,S. H., Sim, K. B., & Lee, J. H. (2009). Detection of concealed information: Combining a virtual mock crime with a P300-based guilty knowledgetest. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12, 269-275.

21.

Happel, M. D. (2005). Neuroscience and the detectionof deception. Review of Policy Research, 22,667-685.

22.

Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Stromwall, L. A., &Kronkvist, O. (2006). Strategic use of evidenceduring police interrogations: When training todetect deception works. Law and HumanBehavior, 30, 603-619.

23.

Jokinen, A., Santtila, P., Ravaja, N., & Puttonen, S.(2006). Salience of guilty knowledge test itemsaffects accuracy in realistic mock crimes.International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62,175-184.

24.

Kozel, F. A., Johnson, K. A., Mu, Q., Grenesko, E.L., Laken, S. J., & George, M. S. (2005).Detecting deception using functional magneticresonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 58,605-613.

25.

Krapohl, D., & Sturm, S. (2002). Terminologyreference for the science of psychophysiologicaldetection of deception. Washington, DC:American Polygraph Association.

26.

Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, I., Maldjian, J. A., Gur,R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., O'Brien, C.P., & Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain activityduring simulated deception: An event-relatedfunctional magnetic resonance study.Neuroimage, 15, 727-732.

27.

Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Usesand abuses of the lie detector. New York:Plenum Press.

28.

Mertens, R., & Allen, J. J. B. (2008). The role ofpsychophysiology in forensic assessments:Deception detection, ERPs, and virtual realitymock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45,286-298.

29.

Merzagora, A. C., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, M., & Onaral,B. (2006). Wavelet analysis for EEG featureextraction in deception detection. Proceedings ofthe 28th IEEE, Engineering in Medicine andBiology Society Annual International Conference,2434-2437.

30.

Miller, G. R., & Stiff, J. B. (1993). Deceptivecommunication. CA: Sage.

31.

Mohamed., F. B., Faro, S. H., Gordon, N. J., Platek,S. M., Ahmad, H., & Williams, J. M. (2006).Brain mapping of deception and truth tellingabout an ecologically valid situation: FunctionalMR imaging and polygraph investigation-initialexperience. Radiology, 238, 679-688.

32.

National Research Council. (2003). The polygraphand lie detection. Washington, DC: NationalAcademies Press.

33.

Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & vanGerven, P. W. (1998). Cognitive loadmeasurement as a means to advance cognitiveload theory. Educational Psychologist, 38, 63-71.

34.

Porter, S., & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language ofdeceit: An investigation of the verbal clues todeception in the interrogation context. Law andHuman Behavior, 20, 443-458.

35.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Shue, E., & Singer, E. (2007).Single versus multiple probe blocks ofP300-based concealed information tests forself-referring versus incidentally obtainedinformation. Biological Psychology, 74, 396-404.

36.

Rosenfeld, J. P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., & Ryan, A.(2004). Simple, effective countermeasures toP300-based tests of detection of concealedinformation. Psychophysiology, 41, 205-219.

37.

Schweizer, M. E., Brodt, S. E., & Croson, R. T. A.(2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access andthe strategic use of deception. The InternationalJournal of Conflict Management, 13, 258-275.

38.

Seth, A. K., Iversen, J. R., & Edelman, G. M. (2006).Single-trial discrimination of truthful fromdeceptive responses during a game of financialrisk using alpha-band MEG signals.Neuroimage. 32, 465-476.

39.

Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D.,Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., &Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiologicalaccount of deception: Evidence from functionalneuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of theRoyal Society of London, 359, 1755-1762.

40.

Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less traveled road to truth:Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts offabricated and self-experienced events. AppliedCognitive Psychology, 11, 373-397.

41.

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F.(1998). Cognitive architecture and instructionaldesign. Educational Psychology Review, 10,251-296.

42.

Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Telling and detectinglies in a high-stake situation: The case of aconvicted murderer. Applied CognitivePsychology, 15, 187-203.

43.

Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K. P., & Bull, R.(2000). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbaland nonverbal behavior. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 24, 239-263.

44.

Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006).Detecting deception by manipulating cognitiveload. Trend in Cognitive. Sciences, 10, 141-142

45.

Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2008). Acognitive load approach to lie detection. Journalof Investigative Psychology and OffenderProfiling, 5, 39-43

46.

Vrij, A., Mann, S., Fisher, R., Leal, S., Milne, R., &Bull, R. (2008). Increasing cognitive load tofacilitate lie detection: The benefit or recalling anevent in reverse order. Law and HumanBehavior, 32, 253-265.

47.

Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E., &Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanismsunderlying lying to questions: Response time asa cue to deception. Appled CognitivePsychology, 17, 744-755.

48.

Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams,B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lyingperson-to-person about events: A cognitiveframework for lie detection. PersonnelPsychology, 58, 141-170.

49.

White, C. H., & Burgoon, J. K. (2001). Adaptation acommunicative design: Patterns of interaction intruthful and deceptive conversations. HumanCommunication Research, 27, 9-37.

50.

Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime andhuman nature. New York: Simon & Schuster.

51.

Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R.(1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication ofdeception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances inexperimental social psychology. New York:Academic Press

한국심리학회지: 사회 및 성격