바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

Matching Hypotheses of Similarity of Shapes of Faces and of Similarity of Attractiveness of Faces

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology / Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, (P)1229-0653;
2011, v.25 no.1, pp.77-93
https://doi.org/10.21193/kjspp.2011.25.1.005


  • Downloaded
  • Viewed

Abstract

Attractiveness similarity ratings and shape similarity ratings for the faces of actual and of random couples (produced from wedding pictures of Koreans) were analyzed. Both attractiveness similarity and shape similarity of actual couples were higher than those of random couples. Differences in the attractiveness similarity between actual and random couples based on attractiveness ratings on single faces were not significant but the result patterns were consistent with Attractiveness Matching hypothesis. Differences in the shape similarity between actual and random couples based on categorization of single faces into one of seven categories (circle, oval,square, rectangle, diamond, triangle, and inverted triangle) were not significant, but the result patterns were also consistent with the Matching Principle. Results were interpreted as partial support for Similarity-Attraction or Assortative Mating hypothesis, especially for Mere-Exposure Effect explanation (Hinsz, 1989) or Imprinting explanation rather than Zajonc et al's (1987) Emotional Efference explanation.

keywords
맞춤 원리(Matching Principle), 동류 짝 결정(Assortative Mating), 신체 특징(얼굴 모양) 유사성, 신체(얼굴) 매력 유사성, 유사성-매력 가설, 타 인종 효과(Other-race effect), 자기 인종 편파(Own-race bias), Matching Hypothesis, Assortative Mating, Similarity of the Shape of Faces, Similarity of Physical (Face) Attractiveness, Similarity-Attraction Hypothesis, Other-Race Effect, Own-Race Bias.

Reference

1.

Allison, D. B., Neale, M. C., Kezis, M. I., Alfonso, V.C., Heshka, S., & Hemsfield, S. B. (1996).Assortative mating for relative weight: Geneticimplications. Behavior Genetics, 26, 103-111.

2.

Aron, A. (1988). The matching hypothesisreconsidered again: Comment of Kalick andHamilton. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 54, 441-446.

3.

Bateson, P. (1978). Sexual imprinting and optimal outbreeding. Nature 273, 659-660.

4.

Bateson, P. (1982). Preferences for cousins inJapanese quail. Nature 295, 236-237.

5.

Bateson, P. (1983). Optimal outbreeding. In P.Bateson (Ed.), Mate choice (pp. 257-278).Cambridge University Press.

6.

Bentler, P. M., & Newcomb, M. D. (1978).Longitudinal study of maritial success andfailure. Journal of Consulting and ClinicalPsychology, 46, 1053-1070.

7.

Bereczkei, T., Gyuris, P., Koves, P., & Bernath, L.(2002). Homogamy, genetic similarity, andimprinting: Parental influence on mate choicepreferences. Personality and IndividualDifferences, 33, 677-690.

8.

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, G.W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and datingchoice: A test of the matching hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7,173–189.

9.

Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1974). Physicalattractiveness. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advancesin experimental social psychology (Vol. 7, (pp.157–215). New York: Academic Press.

10.

Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., &Caldara, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we lookat faces. PLoS ONE, 3, e3022.doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0003022.

11.

Byrne, D. (1971). Attraction paradigm. New York:Academic Press.

12.

Caldara, R., Zhou, X., & Miellet, S. (2010). Puttingculture under 'spotlight' reveals universalinformation use for face recognition. PLoS ONE,5, e9708, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0009708

13.

Feingold, A. (1988). Matching for attractiveness inromantic partners and same-sex friends: Ameta-analysis and theoretical critique.Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226–.235.

14.

Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. The Journal of theAnthropological Institute of Great Britain andIreland, 15, 246-263.

15.

Griffiths, R. W., & Kunz, P. R. (1973). Assortativemating: A study of physiognomic homogamy.Social Biology, 20, 448–.453.

16.

Hill, C. T., & Peplau, L. A. (1998). Premaritalpredictors of relationship outcomes: A 15-yearfollowup of the Boston Couples Study. In T. N.Bradbury (Ed.), The development of course ofmarital dysfunction (pp. 237-278). New York:Cambridge University Press.

17.

Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976).Breakups before marriage: The end of 103affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–.168.

18.

Hinsz, V. B. (1989). Facial resemblance in engagedand married couples. Journal of Social andPersonal Relationships, 6, 223–.229.

19.

Horry, R., Wright, D. B., & Tredoux, C. G. (2010).Recognition and context memory for faces fromown and other ethnic groups: A remember-knowinvestigation. Memory & Cognition, 38, 134-141.

20.

Immelmann, K. (1971). Sexual and other long-termaspects of imprinting in birds and other species.In D. S. Lehman, R. A. Hinde, & E. Show(Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior. (Vol.4). pp. 147-174. New York: Academic Press.

21.

Keller, M., Thiessen, D., & Young, R. K. (1996).Mate assortment in dating and married couples.Personality and Individual Differences, 21,217-221.

22.

Kelly, D. J., Miellet, S., & Caldara, R. (2010). Cultureshapes eye movements for visually homogeneousobjects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 6.1-7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00006

23.

Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K.,Ge., L, & Pascalis, O. (2007). The other-raceeffect develops during infancy: Evidence ofperceptual narrowing. Psychological Science, 18,1084-1089.

24.

Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractivefaces are only average. Psychological Science, 1,115-121.

25.

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P.(1944). Level of aspiration. In J. McV. Hunt(Ed.), Personality and behavior disorders. (Vol.1, pp. 333-378). New York: Ronald Press.

26.

Lindsay, D. S., Jack, P. C., & Christian, M. A.(1991). Other-race perception. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 76, 587-589.

27.

Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2006).Assortative mating for perceived facial traits.Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 973–.984.

28.

Malpass, R, S., & Kravitz, J. (1969). Recognition forfaces of own and other race faces. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 13, 330–334.

29.

Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirtyyears of investing the own-race bias in memoryfor faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology,Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.

30.

Nisbett, R. E., Miyamoto, Y. (2005). The influence ofculture: Holistic versus analytic perception.Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 467-473.

31.

Oreffice, S., & Quintana-Domeque, C. (2009).Anthropometry and Socioeconomics in theCouple: Evidence from the PSID. Unpublished Manuscript.

32.

O’Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A,. Valentin, D., &Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of facerecognition and the other-race effect. Memory& Cognition, 22, 208–224.

33.

Pearson, K. (1903). Assortative mating in man: Acooperative study. Biometrika, 2, 481-498.

34.

Pearson, K., & Lee, A. (1903). On the laws ofinheritance in man: I. Inheritance of physicalcharacters. Biometrika, 2, 357-462.

35.

Penton-Voak, L. S., Perrett, D. I., & Peirce, J. W. (1999). Computer graphic studies of the role offacial familarity in judgements of attractiveness.Current Psychology: Development · Learning ·Social, 18, 104-117.

36.

Perlman, D, & Oskamp, F. (1971). The effects ofpicture content and exposure frequency onevaluations of Negros and whites. Journal ofExperimental Social Psychology, 7. 503-514.

37.

Roberts, D. F. (1977). Assortative mating in man:Husband/wife correlations in physicalcharacteristics. Supplement to the Bulletin of the Eugenics Society, 2 (Whole Part).

38.

Rushton, J. P. (1989). Genetic similarity, humanaltruism, and group selection. Behavioral andBrain Sciences, 12, 503-559.

39.

Rushton, J. P. (1995). Genetic similarity theory andhuman assortative mating: A reply to Russell &Wells. Animal Behavior, 50, 547-549.

40.

Russell, R. J. H., & Wells, P. A. (1995). Human assortative mating: More questions concerninggenetic similarity theory. Animal Behavior, 50,550-553.

41.

Sangrigoli, S., Palier, C., Argenti, A. M., Ventureyra,V. A. G., & de Schonen, S. (2005). Reversibilityof the other-race effect in face recognition during childhood.. Psychological Science, 16,440-444.

42.

Taylor, S. E., Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (2000).Social psychology, 10th. ed. Upper Saddle River,NJ: Prentice Hall.

43.

Thiessen, D. (1999). Social influences on humanassortative mating. In M. C. Corballis, & S. G.Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychologicalperspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 311-323).Oxford: Oxford University Press.

44.

Thiessen, D., & Gregg, B. (1980). Human assortativemating and genetic equilibrium: An evolutionaryperspective. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1,111-140.

45.

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S. W., Miller, R., Scheyd,G., McCullough, J. K. & Franklin, M. (2003).Major histocompatibility genes, symmetry andbody scent attractiveness in men and women.Behavioral Ecology, 14, 668-678.

46.

Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating, orwho marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2,127-157.

47.

Wedekind, C., & Furi, S. (1997). Body odourpreferences in men and women: Do they aim forspecific MHC combinations or simplyhetereozygnosity? Proceedings of Royal Society,London, B, 264, 1471-1479.

48.

Wedekind, C., Seebeck, T., Brettens, F., & Pacpe, A.J. (1995). MHC-dependent mate preferences inhuman. Proceedings of Royal Society, London,B, 260, 245-249.

49.

Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mereexposure. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology Monograph 9, 1-29.

50.

Zajonc, R. B. (1985). Emotion and facial efference.Science, 228, 15-21.

51.

Zajonc, R. B., Adelmann, P. K., Murphy, S. T., &Niendenthal, P. M. (1987). Convergence in thephysical appearance of spouses. Motivation andEmotion, 11, 335–.346.

52.

Zei, G., Astofli, P., & Jayakar, S. D. (1981).Correlation between father's age and husband'sage: A case of imprinting? Journal of BiosocialScience, 13, 409-418.

Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology