바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

  • KOREAN
  • P-ISSN1229-070X
  • E-ISSN2713-9581
  • KCI

Article Contents

Prev
e-Submission

Vol.17 No.2

Citation Share

A Preliminary Study for Validation of Structured Clinical Interview for Game Addiction(SCI-GA) for Adolescent

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology / The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, (P)1229-070X; (E)2713-9581
2012, v.17 no.2, pp.545-555
https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.2.016




& (2012). A Preliminary Study for Validation of Structured Clinical Interview for Game Addiction(SCI-GA) for Adolescent. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 17(2), 545-555, https://doi.org/10.17315/kjhp.2012.17.2.016

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a Structured Clinical Interview for Game Addiction(SCI-GA) developed to refer DSM-IV-TR criteria for substance dependence and precedent studies. The factor structure, item property, inter consistency reliability, inter-rater reliability, and criterion-related validity were estimated using responses of 77 high school students that administered by two clinicians. SCI-GA showed one factor structure and high reliability(internal consistency reliability=.89; inter-rater reliability- all 100, sub-criteria =.50～1.00, ps<.001) with adequate criterion-reliability validity(level of gambling addiction r=.81, study problems r=.32, tardiness/absence r=.40, friction with families r=.37, ps<.001). Findings demonstrated that SCI-GA is reliable and valid in assessing game addiction in adolescent. Implications of the findings and directions to counseling on game addiction are discussed.

keywords
게임 중독, 청소년 게임 중독 진단 임상면접 도구(SCI-GA), 신뢰도, 타당도, game addiction, Structured Clinical Interview for Game Addiction(SCI-GA) for Adolescent, reliability, validity

Reference

1.

강성군, 김교헌, 이민규, 임지향 (2010). 도박중독의 측정: KNODS, KCPGI 및 KSOGS의 비교. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 15(3), 569-581.

2.

김교헌 (2002). 심리학적 관점에서 본 중독. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 7(2), 159-179.

3.

김교헌 (2006). 중독과 자기조절: 인지신경과학적 접근.한국심리학회지: 건강, 11(1), 63-105.

4.

김교헌 (2007). 중독, 그 미궁을 헤쳐 나가기. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(4), 677-693.

5.

김교헌, 최훈석 (2008). 인터넷 게임중독: 자기조절 모형. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 13(3), 551-569.

6.

김교헌, 최훈석, 권선중, 용정순 (2009). 한국형 아동/청소년 게임 중독 척도의 개발 및 타당화. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(3), 511-529.

7.

성태제 (2005). 타당도와 신뢰도. 서울: 학지사.

8.

American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (rev. 4th ed.). Washington, DC: APA.

9.

Grant, J. E., Steinberg, M. A., Kim, S. W., Rounsaville, B. J., & Potenza, M. N. (2004). Preliminary validity and reliability testing of a structured clinical interview for pathological gambling. Psychiatry Research, 128, 79-88.

10.

Miller, W. R., Wilbourne, P. L., & Hettema, J. E.(2003). What works? A summary of alcoholtreatment outcome research. In R. K. Hester& W. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook ofAlcoholism Treatment Approaches: EffectiveAlternatives (3rd ed., pp. 13-63). Boston,MA: Allyn & Bacon.

11.

Miller, W. R., Zweben, J., & Johnson, W. R. (2005). Evidence-based treatment: Why, what, where, when, and how? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 29(4), 267-276.

12.

Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A., LaBrie, R. A., Kidman, R. C., Donato, A. N., & Stanton, M. V. (2004). Toward a syndrome model of addiction: multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvavrd Review of Psychiatry, 12, 367–374.

The Korean Journal of Health Psychology

e-Submission OA Policy